The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring Marketing Productivity: Current Knowledge and Future Directions
Open accessAbstract
For too long, marketers have not been held accountable for showing how marketing expenditures add to shareholder value. As time has gone by, this lack of accountability has undermined marketers’ credibility, threatened the standing of the marketing function within the firm, and even threatened marketing's existence as a distinct capability within the firm. This article proposes a broad framework for assessing marketing productivity, cataloging what is already known, and suggesting areas for further research. The authors conclude that it is possible to show how marketing expenditures add to shareholder value. The effective dissemination of new methods of assessing marketing productivity to the business community will be a major step toward raising marketing's vitality in the firm and, more important, toward raising the performance of the firm itself. The authors also suggest many areas in which further research is essential to making methods of evaluating marketing productivity increasingly valid, reliable, and practical.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research
Fournier, S. (1998) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209515 · Cited by 7,542
A national customer satisfaction barometer: the Swedish experience
Fornell, C. (1992) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1252129 · Cited by 5,641
Return on Marketing: Using Customer Equity to Focus Marketing Strategy
Rust, R. T., Lemon, K. N., & Zeithaml, V. A. (2004) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.68.1.109.24030 · Cited by 2,151
Self-citationThe Financial Information Content of Perceived Quality
Aaker, D. A., & Jacobson, R. (1994) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3152193 · Cited by 789
Kamakura, W. A., Ramaswami, S. N., & Srivastava, R. K. (1991) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/0167-8116(91)90030-b · Cited by 240
Self-citationWang, P., & Splegel, T. (1994) · Journal of Direct Marketing · doi:10.1002/dir.4000080210 · Cited by 62
Cited by
Return on Marketing: Using Customer Equity to Focus Marketing Strategy
Rust, R. T., Lemon, K. N., & Zeithaml, V. A. (2004) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.68.1.109.24030 · Cited by 2,151
Self-citationLuo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2009) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.73.6.198 · Cited by 962
A Customer Lifetime Value Framework for Customer Selection and Resource Allocation Strategy
Venkatesan, R., & Kumar, V. (2004) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.68.4.106.42728 · Cited by 948
Self-citationThe Impact of Customer Relationship Characteristics on Profitable Lifetime Duration
Reinartz, W. J., & Kumar, V. (2003) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.67.1.77.18589 · Cited by 811
Self-citationUnderstanding the Marketing Department's Influence within the Firm
Verhoef, P. C., & Leeflang, P. S. H. (2009) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.73.2.14 · Cited by 587
Metadata
- Authors
- Rust, R. T., Ambler, T., Carpenter, G. S., Kumar, V., & Srivastava, R. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 76-89
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7185
- OpenAlex
- W2193038455
- Cited by
- 1,107
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 119.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring Marketing Productivity: Current Knowledge and Future Directions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1509/jmkg.68.4.76.42721
- The paper
- Rust, R. T., Ambler, T., Carpenter, G. S., Kumar, V., & Srivastava, R. K. (2004). Measuring Marketing Productivity: Current Knowledge and Future Directions. Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.4.76.42721
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.