The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Decision Making and Coping of Functionally Illiterate Consumers and Some Implications for Marketing Management
Abstract
A study of the decision making and coping of functionally illiterate consumers reveals cognitive predilections, decision heuristics and trade-offs, and coping behaviors that distinguish them from literate consumers. English-as-a-second-language and poor, literate consumers are used as comparison groups. The strong predilection for concrete reasoning and overreliance on pictographic information of functionally illiterate consumers suggest that companies should reconsider how they highlight the added benefits of new products or the differentiating aspects of existing product offerings across channels such as advertising, in-store displays, and positioning. Concrete reasoning also has strong implications for the execution and presentation of price promotions through coupons and in-store discounts, because many consumers are unable to process the information and thus avoid discounted products. Finally, the elaborate coping mechanisms identified and the loyalty that functionally illiterate consumers display toward companies that are sensitive to their literacy and numeracy deficiencies reveal a potential for loyalty programs aimed at this population that do not involve price discounts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789
Reinartz, W. J., & Kumar, V. (2000) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.64.4.17.18077 · Cited by 1,364
Bendapudi, N., & Leone, R. P. (2002) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.66.2.83.18476 · Cited by 303
Cited by
Deception by Implication: A Typology of Truthful but Misleading Advertising and Labeling Claims
Hastak, M., & Mazis, M. B. (2011) · Journal of Public Policy & Marketing · doi:10.1509/jppm.30.2.157 · Cited by 122
Lee, T., Lee, B.-K., & Lee-Geiller, S. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102098 · Cited by 122
Metadata
- Authors
- Viswanathan, M., Rosa, J. A., & Harris, J. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15-31
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7185
- OpenAlex
- W2179592656
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 15.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.