The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
It Just Feels Good: Customers’ Affective Response to Touch and Its Influence on Persuasion
Abstract
Prior research has assumed that touch has a persuasive effect only if it provides attribute or structural information about a product. Under this view, the role of touch as a persuasive tool is limited. The main purpose of this research is to investigate the persuasive influence of touch as an affective tool in the absence of useful product-related information. The authors find that for people who are motivated to touch because it is fun or interesting, a communication that incorporates touch leads to increased affective response and increased persuasion, particularly when the touch provides neutral or positive sensory feedback. People who are not motivated to touch for fun will also be persuaded by a communication that incorporates touch when they are able to make sense of how the touch is related to the message. The authors explore the effectiveness of different types of touch in generating an affective response, and they replicate the effects on attitudes and behavior in a real-world setting. This research suggests that the marketing implications of touch are more substantial than previously believed. The authors present research implications for direct marketing, product packaging, point-of-purchase displays, and print advertising.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Arnold, M. J., & Reynolds, K. E. (2003) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/s0022-4359(03)00007-1 · Cited by 2,373
A benefit congruency framework of sales promotion effectiveness
Chandon, P., Wansink, B., & Laurent, G. (2000) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.64.4.65.18071 · Cited by 1,518
Cited by
Cross-Sectional versus longitudinal survey research: concepts, findings, and guidelines
Rindfleisch, A., Malter, A. J., Ganesan, S., & Moorman, C. (2008) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.45.3.261 · Cited by 1,305
Shu, S. B., & Peck, J. (2011) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2011.01.002 · Cited by 418
Self-citationLi, C.-Y. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.09.003 · Cited by 343
Heller, J., Chylinski, M., de Ruyter, K., Mahr, D., & Keeling, D. I. (2019) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2019.10.008 · Cited by 271
The interplay of customer experience and commitment
Keiningham, T., Ball, J., Benoit (née Moeller), S., Bruce, H. L., Buoye, A., Dzenkovska, J., Nasr, L., Ou, Y.-C., & Zaki, M. (2017) · Journal of Services Marketing · doi:10.1108/jsm-09-2016-0337 · Cited by 156
Metadata
- Authors
- Peck, J., & Wiggins, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-10
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 56-69
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7185
- OpenAlex
- W1972881006
- Cited by
- 397
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 21.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: It Just Feels Good: Customers’ Affective Response to Touch and Its Influence on Persuasion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1509/jmkg.70.4.056
- The paper
- Peck, J., & Wiggins, J. (2006). It Just Feels Good: Customers’ Affective Response to Touch and Its Influence on Persuasion. Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.70.4.056
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.