The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trust at Different Organizational Levels
Abstract
The authors explore the effects of trust at three distinct organizational levels in a marketing collaboration: interorganizational trust between collaborating firms, each firm's agency trust in its own representatives assigned to a collaborative entity (coentity), and intraentity trust among the representatives assigned to the coentity. Dyadic survey and longitudinal objective performance data from 114 international joint ventures indicate that trust at each level has unique effects but similarly influences the collaborating firms' resource investments or the coentity's use of those resources. Interorganizational and agency trust motivate resource investments in the coentity, particularly in the context of a differentiation strategy, whereas intraentity trust promotes coordination within the coentity, and interorganizational trust and a differentiation strategy magnify that effect. Intraentity trust can also undermine coentity responsiveness to environmental change, especially when joined by interorganizational trust between collaborating firms and formalized decision making within the coentity. These findings demonstrate that managing and building trust at multiple levels is critical to the success of interorganizational marketing collaborations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800302 · Cited by 22,355
An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer-Seller Relationships
Doney, P. M., & Cannon, J. P. (1997) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1251829 · Cited by 6,822
Moorman, C., Zaltman, G., & Deshpande, R. (1992) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379202900303 · Cited by 1,901
Customer Loyalty to Whom? Managing the Benefits and Risks of Salesperson-Owned Loyalty
Palmatier, R. W., Scheer, L. K., & Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. (2007) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.44.2.185 · Cited by 555
Self-citation
Cited by
Measuring trust in organisational research: Review and recommendations
McEvily, B., & Tortoriello, M. (2011) · Journal of Trust Research · doi:10.1080/21515581.2011.552424 · Cited by 477
Elbeltagi, I., & Agag, G. (2016) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-10-2014-0244 · Cited by 232
It Isn’t Always Mutual: A Critical Review of Dyadic Trust
Korsgaard, M. A., Brower, H. H., & Lester, S. W. (2015) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206314547521 · Cited by 175
Metadata
- Authors
- Fang, E. (., Palmatier, R. W., Scheer, L. K., & Li, N.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-03
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 80-98
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7185
- OpenAlex
- W2052664406
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 41.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.