The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does In-Store Marketing Work? Effects of the Number and Position of Shelf Facings on Brand Attention and Evaluation at the Point of Purchase
Open accessAbstract
Recent trends in marketing have demonstrated an increased focus on in-store expenditures with the hope of “grabbing consumers” at the point of purchase, but does this make sense? To help answer this question, the authors examine the interplay between in-store and out-of-store factors on consumer attention to and evaluation of brands displayed on supermarket shelves. Using an eye-tracking experiment, they find that the number of facings has a strong impact on evaluation that is entirely mediated by its effect on visual attention and works particularly well for frequent users of the brand, for low-market-share brands, and for young and highly educated consumers who are willing to trade off brand and price. They also find that gaining in-store attention is not always sufficient to drive sales. For example, top- and middle-shelf positions gain more attention than low-shelf positions; however, only top-shelf positions carry through to brand evaluation. The results underscore the importance of combining eye-tracking and purchase data to obtain a full picture of the effects of in-store and out-of-store marketing at the point of purchase.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research
Rayner, K. (1998) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372 · Cited by 7,979
Visual attention during brand choice: The impact of time pressure and task motivation
Pieters, R., & Warlop, L. (1999) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/s0167-8116(98)00022-6 · Cited by 603
Cited by
How Package Design and Packaged‐based Marketing Claims Lead to Overeating
Chandon, P. (2013) · Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy · doi:10.1093/aepp/pps028 · Cited by 249
Self-citationSpence, C., & Velasco, C. (2018) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.03.008 · Cited by 177
The interplay of customer experience and commitment
Keiningham, T., Ball, J., Benoit (née Moeller), S., Bruce, H. L., Buoye, A., Dzenkovska, J., Nasr, L., Ou, Y.-C., & Zaki, M. (2017) · Journal of Services Marketing · doi:10.1108/jsm-09-2016-0337 · Cited by 156
Enyejo, J. O., Obani, O. Q., Afolabi, O., Igba, E., & Ibokette, A. I. (2024) · Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews · doi:10.30574/msarr.2024.11.2.0116 · Cited by 83
Marketing analytics using anonymized and fragmented tracking data
Kakatkar, C., & Spann, M. (2019) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2018.10.001 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Chandon, P., Hutchinson, J. W., Bradlow, E. T., & Young, S. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-11
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1-17
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7185
- OpenAlex
- W3122753270
- Cited by
- 813
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 66.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.