The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why do Older Consumers Buy Older Brands? The Role of Attachment and Declining Innovativeness
Abstract
The authors compare three mechanisms that may explain why older consumers tend to prefer older brands. Data are from the French perfume market, in which some market leaders are decades old while hundreds of new entrants launch yearly. The authors reveal monotonically increasing differences across age ranges. Younger consumers have a greater propensity to change their preferred brand, a form of innovativeness that benefits relatively recent entrants, whereas older consumers exhibit a propensity to remain attached for a longer duration to the same preferred brand. Nostalgia for options encountered during an early “formative period” has only a limited impact. Furthermore, strong heterogeneity emerges: At all ages, some consumers frequently change their preferred brand, whereas others remain attached to it for long periods. It is the proportion of these two behaviors that varies across age ranges. The resultant managerial implications indicate that mature consumers are attractive targets because they likely remain attached to a brand longer, that long-established products may still attract new consumers, and that the success of a new brand among young consumers may be ephemeral.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Possessions and the Extended Self
Belk, R. W. (1988) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209154 · Cited by 9,064
The Ties That Bind: Measuring the Strength of Consumers’ Emotional Attachments to Brands
Thomson, M., MacInnis, D. J., & Whan Park, C. (2005) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1501_10 · Cited by 2,713
Cited by
Happiness from Ordinary and Extraordinary Experiences
Bhattacharjee, A., & Mogilner, C. (2014) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/674724 · Cited by 380
Consumer–Brand Relationships: A Contrast of Nostalgic and Non‐Nostalgic Brands
Kessous, A., Roux, E., & Chandon, J. (2015) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20772 · Cited by 120
Perception of advertisements with celebrity endorsement among mature consumers
Chan, K., & Fan, F. (2022) · Journal of Marketing Communications · doi:10.1080/13527266.2020.1843063 · Cited by 40
The finitude of life—How mortality salience affects consumer behavior: A review
Gobrecht, F., & Marchand, A. (2023) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.2117 · Cited by 28
The Millennials: Insights to Brand Behavior for Brand Management Strategies
Olga, B., David, D. D., Dhameeth, G. S., Adam, S., & Elliott, S. (2018) · Journal of Management and Strategy · doi:10.5430/jms.v9n3p1 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Lambert-Pandraud, R., & Laurent, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-09
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 104-121
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7185
- OpenAlex
- W2077411956
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 44.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.