The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Model of Web Site Browsing Behavior Estimated on Clickstream Data
Abstract
Using the clickstream data recorded in Web server log files, the authors develop and estimate a model of the browsing behavior of visitors to a Web site. Two basic aspects of browsing behavior are examined: (1) the visitor's decisions to continue browsing (by submitting an additional page request) or to exit the site and (2) the length of time spent viewing each page. The authors propose a type II tobit model that captures both aspects of browsing behavior and handles the limitations of server log-file data. The authors fit the model to the individual-level browsing decisions of a random sample of 5000 visitors to the Web site of an Internet automotive company. Empirical results show that visitors' propensity to continue browsing changes dynamically as a function of the depth of a given site visit and the number of repeat visits to the site. The dynamics are consistent both with “within-site lock-in” or site “stickiness” and with learning that carries over repeat visits. In particular, repeat visits lead to reduced page-view propensities but not to reduced page-view durations. The results also reveal browsing patterns that may reflect visitors' time-saving strategies. Finally, the authors report that simple site metrics computed at the aggregate level diverge substantially from individual-level modeling results, which indicates the need for Web site analyses to control for cross-sectional heterogeneity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities
Gelfand, A. E., & Smith, A. F. M. (1990) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1990.10476213 · Cited by 6,606
Characterizing browsing strategies in the World-Wide web
Catledge, L. D., & Pitkow, J. E. (1995) · Computer Networks and ISDN Systems · doi:10.1016/0169-7552(95)00043-7 · Cited by 937
Cognitive Lock-In and the Power Law of Practice
Johnson, E. J., Bellman, S., & Lohse, G. L. (2003) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.67.2.62.18615 · Cited by 389
Investigating Household Purchase Timing Decisions: A Conditional Hazard Function Approach
Jain, D. C., & Vilcassim, N. J. (1991) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.10.1.1 · Cited by 270
Cited by
Digital marketing: a framework, review, and research agenda
Kannan, P. K., & Li, H. “. (2017) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.11.006 · Cited by 1,707
Lamberton, C., & Stephen, A. T. (2016) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.15.0415 · Cited by 1,127
Huang, P., Lurie, N. H., & Mitra, S. (2009) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.73.2.55 · Cited by 760
Does Anyone Read the Fine Print? Consumer Attention to Standard-Form Contracts
Bakos, Y., Marotta-Wurgler, F., & Trossen, D. R. (2014) · The Journal of Legal Studies · doi:10.1086/674424 · Cited by 436
Making conversations with chatbots more personalized
Shumanov, M., & Johnson, L. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106627 · Cited by 363
Metadata
- Authors
- Bucklin, R. E., & Sismeiro, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-08
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 249-267
- ISSN
- 0022-2437 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7193
- OpenAlex
- W2128857864
- Cited by
- 420
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 48.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.