Cited by 363AI in Service InteractionsSocial Robot Interaction and HRIDigital Marketing and Social Media

Making conversations with chatbots more personalized

Shumanov, Michael, Johnson, Lester·2021·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106627

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shumanov, M., & Johnson, L.
Affiliations
Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
Corresponding author
Shumanov, Michael
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
117
Pages
106627
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3100581793
Cited by
363
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 58 · 2025: 88 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 27
FWCI
12.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
Keywords
chatbots, consumer personality, human-computer interaction, personality congruence, customer engagement, social benefits, customer satisfaction, intelligent agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review