The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Linking Customer Management Effort to Customer Profitability in Business Markets
Abstract
Chain-link frameworks such as the service–profit chain (SPC) are much discussed as a means to link customer profits to operational resources under the influence of vendor managers, though empirical testing to date has been limited primarily to consumer services settings. In this article, the authors adapt the SPC framework to accommodate characteristics of business markets, specifically the complex decision-making unit, strategic supplier selection, and resource allocation at the individual customer level. They also extend the SPC framework to allow for a richer description of the complex linkages between vendor effort and account profitability, namely, nonlinear linkages and differential responsiveness occasioned by customer-specific factors such as competitive context. Controlling for such factors illuminates, to some degree, why similar levels of customer management effort and/or performance can yield quite different customer profitability outcomes. The authors present an application that demonstrates how adaptation and extension of the SPC to business markets can provide vendors with (1) insights into the process that culminates in individual customer profitability and (2) useful guidelines for adapting their customer management efforts at the individual account level with an aim to improve account profitability. The results show the importance of accounting for decreasing returns to customer management effort at a given account, and they reinforce the notion of customer delight.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer-Seller Relationships
Doney, P. M., & Cannon, J. P. (1997) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1251829 · Cited by 6,822
Determinants of Long-Term Orientation in Buyer-Seller Relationships
Ganesan, S. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800201 · Cited by 6,741
An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment
Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1988) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378802500207 · Cited by 6,293
Oliver, R. L. (1999) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/00222429990634s105 · Cited by 4,898
Consumer trust, value, and loyalty in relational exchanges
Sirdeshmukh, D., Singh, J., & Sabol, B. (2002) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.66.1.15.18449 · Cited by 4,196
CONDUCTING INTERORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH USING KEY INFORMANTS.
KUMAR, N., STERN, L. W., & ANDERSON, J. C. (1993) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256824 · Cited by 2,467
Implications of Loyalty Program Membership and Service Experiences for Customer Retention and Value
Bolton, R. N., Kannan, P. K., & Bramlett, M. D. (2000) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070300281009 · Cited by 1,157
Cited by
Do Satisfied Customers Buy More? Examining Moderating Influences in a Retailing Context
Seiders, K., Voss, G. B., Grewal, D., & Godfrey, A. L. (2005) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.26 · Cited by 939
Wetzel, H. A., Hammerschmidt, M., & Zablah, A. R. (2014) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.12.0167 · Cited by 216
Reimer, K., & Becker, J. U. (2015) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-014-0110-z · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Bowman, D., & Narayandas, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 433-447
- ISSN
- 0022-2437 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7193
- OpenAlex
- W1973965508
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 22.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Linking Customer Management Effort to Customer Profitability in Business Markets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1509/jmkr.41.4.433.47011
- The paper
- Bowman, D., & Narayandas, D. (2004). Linking Customer Management Effort to Customer Profitability in Business Markets. Journal of Marketing Research. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.41.4.433.47011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.