The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Salesperson Adaptive Selling Behavior and Customer Orientation: A Meta-Analysis
Abstract
The authors combine findings from 155 samples of more than 31,000 salespeople to test alternative models of antecedents and consequences of adaptive selling behavior (ASB) and customer orientation (CO). A random-effects meta-analysis yields average values for 28 different correlations ranging from -.16 to .35, 19 of which are significant. Controlling for salesperson gender and selling experience, structural equation modeling indicates that ASB increases self-rated, manager-rated, and objective measures of performance, whereas CO increases only self-rated performance. Both ASB and CO increase job satisfaction. Tests of reciprocal relationships indicate that ASB increases CO and job satisfaction increases performance rather than vice versa. Selling experience increases performance but not job satisfaction, and saleswomen rate their performance and satisfaction slightly higher than salesmen do. The magnitudes of the relationships indicate that ASB and selling experience have greater effects than CO and gender on salesperson performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015) · doi:10.4135/9781483398105 · Cited by 5,542
THEORY TESTING: COMBINING PSYCHOMETRIC META‐ANALYSIS AND STRUCTURAL EQUATIONS MODELING
VISWESVARAN, C., & ONES, D. S. (1995) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01784.x · Cited by 926
Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2000) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00156 · Cited by 833
Cited by
Word-of-mouth communications in marketing: a meta-analytic review of the antecedents and moderators
de Matos, C. A., & Rossi, C. A. V. (2008) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-008-0121-1 · Cited by 1,078
Homburg, C., Müller, M., & Klarmann, M. (2011) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.75.2.55 · Cited by 532
Homburg, C., Wieseke, J., & Bornemann, T. (2009) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.73.4.064 · Cited by 403
Service Recovery Paradox: A Meta-Analysis
de Matos, C. A., Henrique, J. L., & Alberto Vargas Rossi, C. (2007) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670507303012 · Cited by 329
Terho, H., Haas, A., Eggert, A., & Ulaga, W. (2012) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.11.011 · Cited by 326
Metadata
- Authors
- Franke, G. R., & Park, J.-E.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-11
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 693-702
- ISSN
- 0022-2437 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7193
- OpenAlex
- W2060128678
- Cited by
- 704
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 5.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Salesperson Adaptive Selling Behavior and Customer Orientation: A Meta-Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1509/jmkr.43.4.693
- The paper
- Franke, G. R., & Park, J.-E. (2006). Salesperson Adaptive Selling Behavior and Customer Orientation: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Marketing Research. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.43.4.693
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.