Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 469

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 89 of the 89 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Defining Modern Pulmonary Rehabilitation. An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report

Open access
Holland, Anne E., Cox, Narelle S., Houchen-Wolloff, Linzy, Rochester, Carolyn L., Garvey, Chris, ZuWallack, Richard, Nici, Linda, Limberg, Trina, Lareau, Suzanne C., Yawn, Barbara P., Galwicki, Mary, Troosters, Thierry, Steiner, Michael, Casaburi, Richard, Clini, Enrico, Goldstein, Roger S., Singh, Sally J.·2021·Annals of the American Thoracic Society

Abstract

Pulmonary rehabilitation is a highly effective treatment for people with chronic lung disease but remains underused across the world. Recent years have seen the emergence of new program models that aim to improve access and uptake, including telerehabilitation and low-cost, home-based models. This workshop was convened to achieve consensus on the essential components of pulmonary rehabilitation and to identify requirements for successful implementation of emerging program models. A Delphi process involving experts from across the world identified 13 essential components of pulmonary rehabilitation that must be delivered in any program model, encompassing patient assessment, program content, method of delivery, and quality assurance, as well as 27 desirable components. Only those models of pulmonary rehabilitation that have been tested in clinical trials are currently considered as ready for implementation. The characteristics of patients most likely to succeed in each program model are not yet known, and research is needed in this area. Health professionals should use clinical judgment to determine those patients who are best served by a center-based, multidisciplinary rehabilitation program. A comprehensive patient assessment is critical for personalization of pulmonary rehabilitation and for effectively addressing individual patient goals. Robust quality-assurance processes are important to ensure that any pulmonary rehabilitation service delivers optimal outcomes for patients and health services. Workforce capacity-building and training should consider the skills necessary for emerging models, many of which are delivered remotely. The success of all pulmonary rehabilitation models will be judged on whether the essential components are delivered and on whether the expected patient outcomes, including improved exercise capacity, reduced dyspnea, enhanced health-related quality of life, and reduced hospital admissions, are achieved.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1513/annalsats.202102-146st

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 89 references

Metadata

Authors
Holland, A. E., Cox, N. S., Houchen-Wolloff, L., Rochester, C. L., Garvey, C., ZuWallack, R., Nici, L., Limberg, T., Lareau, S. C., Yawn, B. P., Galwicki, M., Troosters, T., Steiner, M., Casaburi, R., Clini, E., Goldstein, R. S., & Singh, S. J.
Venue
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Published
2021-05-01
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
e12-e29
ISSN
  • 2325-6621 (ISSN-L)
  • 2329-6933
OpenAlex
W3158194566
Cited by
469
References
89
FWCI
40.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Defining Modern Pulmonary Rehabilitation. An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1513/annalsats.202102-146st
The paper
Holland, A. E., Cox, N. S., Houchen-Wolloff, L., Rochester, C. L., Garvey, C., ZuWallack, R., Nici, L., Limberg, T., Lareau, S. C., Yawn, B. P., Galwicki, M., Troosters, T., Steiner, M., Casaburi, R., Clini, E., Goldstein, R. S., & Singh, S. J. (2021). Defining Modern Pulmonary Rehabilitation. An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report. Annals of the American Thoracic Society. https://doi.org/10.1513/annalsats.202102-146st

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.