Cited by 6Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchSleep and related disordersPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Risks of Zolpidem among Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Abstract

Abstract Rationale Nonbenzodiazepine benzodiazepine receptor agonists (NBZRA, e.g., zolpidem) are frequently used to treat insomnia among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, multiple observational studies find that patients with COPD who are prescribed NBZRAs have greater risks for mortality and respiratory complications than patients without such prescriptions. Without an active comparator, these studies are susceptible to confounding by indication. Objectives Compare the risk of death or inpatient COPD exacerbation among patients receiving zolpidem relative to patients receiving other hypnotics. Methods Using nationwide Veterans Health Administration (VA) data, we identified patients with clinically diagnosed COPD and new receipt of zolpidem or another hypnotic available on VA formulary without prior authorization (melatonin, trazodone, doxepin). We excluded those receiving traditional benzodiazepines or multiple concurrent hypnotics. We propensity-matched patients receiving zolpidem to other hypnotics on 32 variables, including demographics, comorbidities, and markers of COPD severity. We compared risk of the primary composite outcome of death or inpatient COPD exacerbation over 1 year. In secondary analyses, we propensity-matched patients receiving zolpidem to those without hypnotic receipt. Results Among 283,740 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 1,126 (0.4%) received zolpidem and 3,057 (1.1%) received other hypnotics. We propensity-matched patients receiving zolpidem 1:1 to peers receiving other hypnotics. We did not find a difference in the primary composite outcome of death or inpatient exacerbation (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77–1.23). In secondary analyses comparing patients receiving zolpidem to matched peers without hypnotic receipt, we observed greater risk of death or inpatient exacerbation with zolpidem (hazard ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.09–1.81). Conclusions Among patients with COPD, we did not observe greater risks after new receipt of zolpidem relative to other hypnotics. However, we did observe greater risks relative to those without hypnotic receipt. This latter finding may reflect: 1) residual, unmeasured confounding related to insomnia; or 2) true adverse effects of hypnotics across classes. Future work is needed to better understand the risks of hypnotics in COPD.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1513/annalsats.202307-654oc

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Conditions such as congestive heart failure, bronchial asthma, and COPD can hinder sleep onset and maintenance and are commonly associated with sleep-disordered breathing, further impairing sleep and increasing reliance on hypnotics.

    “Conditions such as congestive heart failure, bronchial asthma, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can hinder sleep onset and maintenance. These disorders are also commonly associated with sleep-disordered breathing (such as obstructive or central sleep apnea), further impairing sleep and increasing reliance on hypnotics.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. George, 2000, Perspectives on the management of insomnia in patients with chronic respiratory disorders, Sleep, 23, S31
  2. Zammit, 1999, Quality of life in people with insomnia, Sleep, 22, S379
  3. Montgomery, 2002, Cognitive behavioural interventions for sleep problems in adults aged 60+, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, CD003161

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Castaneda, J. M., Hee Wai, T., Spece, L. J., Duan, K. I., Leonhard, A., Griffith, M. F., Plumley, R., Palen, B. N., Feemster, L. C., Au, D. H., & Donovan, L. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; and
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • VA Puget Sound Health Care System (US)
Venue
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Published
2024-01-01
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
68-75
ISSN
  • 2325-6621 (ISSN-L)
  • 2329-6933
OpenAlex
W4388233527
Cited by
6
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of the American Thoracic Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Health Services Research and Development (CDA 18-187)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
zolpidem, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypnotics, insomnia, COPD exacerbations, mortality, confounding by indication, veterans, melatonin, trazodone, doxepin, adverse drug reactions, propensity score matching, confounding by treatment
MeSH terms
Zolpidem, Benzodiazepines, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review