The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biomass Fuels and Respiratory Diseases: A Review of the Evidence
Abstract
Globally, about 50% of all households and 90% of rural households use solid fuels (coal and biomass) as the main domestic source of energy, thus exposing approximately 50% of the world population—close to 3 billion people—to the harmful effects of these combustion products. There is strong evidence that acute respiratory infections in children and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in women are associated with indoor biomass smoke. Lung cancer in women has been clearly associated with household coal use. Other conditions such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in men and tuberculosis could be also associated but evidence is scarce. According to estimates of the World Health Organization, more than 1.6 million deaths and over 38.5 million disability-adjusted life-years can be attributable to indoor smoke from solid fuels affecting mainly children and women. Interventions to suppress or reduce indoor exposure include behavior changes, improvements of household ventilation, improvements of stoves, and, outstandingly, transitions to better and cleaner fuels. These changes face personal and local beliefs and economic and sociocultural conditions. In addition, selection of fuels should consider cost, sustainability, and protection of the environment. Consequently, complex solutions need to be locally adapted, and involve the commitment and active participation of governments, scientific societies, nongovernmental organizations, and the general community.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global mortality, disability, and the contribution of risk factors: Global Burden of Disease Study
Murray, C. J., & Lopez, A. D. (1997) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(96)07495-8 · Cited by 4,492
Cited by
Vestbo, J., Hurd, S. S., Agustí, A. G., Jones, P. W., Vogelmeier, C., Anzueto, A., Barnes, P. J., Fabbri, L. M., Martinez, F. J., Nishimura, M., et al. (2013) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201204-0596pp · Cited by 15,983
The Global Burden of Respiratory Disease
Ferkol, T., & Schraufnagel, D. (2014) · Annals of the American Thoracic Society · doi:10.1513/annalsats.201311-405ps · Cited by 734
Respiratory health effects of air pollution: Update on biomass smoke and traffic pollution
Laumbach, R. J., & Kipen, H. M. (2012) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2011.11.021 · Cited by 474
Po, J. Y. T., FitzGerald, J. M., & Carlsten, C. (2011) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thx.2010.147884 · Cited by 450
Kerosene: A Review of Household Uses and their Hazards in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
Lam, N. L., Smith, K. R., Gauthier, A., & Bates, M. N. (2012) · Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B · doi:10.1080/10937404.2012.710134 · Cited by 443
Metadata
- Authors
- Torres-Duque, C., Maldonado, D., Pérez-Padilla, R., Ezzati, M., & Viegi, G.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 577-590
- ISSN
- 1546-3222 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-5665
- OpenAlex
- W2073206823
- Cited by
- 489
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biomass Fuels and Respiratory Diseases: A Review of the Evidence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1513/pats.200707-100rp
- The paper
- Torres-Duque, C., Maldonado, D., Pérez-Padilla, R., Ezzati, M., & Viegi, G. (2008). Biomass Fuels and Respiratory Diseases: A Review of the Evidence. Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society. https://doi.org/10.1513/pats.200707-100rp
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.