Cited by 4Indian and Buddhist StudiesReligious Studies and Spiritual PracticesStudy and Philosophy of Religion

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Das Ende des Dharma und die Ankunft des Maitreya

Deeg, Max·1999·Zeitschrift für Religionswissenschaft

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/0031.145

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A second group of texts presents the parinirvāṇa of Kāśyapa at the time of Maitreya, only mentioning the absorption of the disciple in a preserving meditative state, while not referring to adhiṣṭhāna at all.

    “A second group of texts presents the parinirvāṇa of Kāśyapa at the time of Maitreya, only mentioning the absorption of the disciple in a preserving meditative state, while not referring to adhiṣṭhāna at all.52”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Deeg, M.
Corresponding author
Deeg, Max
Venue
Zeitschrift für Religionswissenschaft
Published
1999-01
Volume
7
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0943-8610 (ISSN-L)
  • 2194-508X
OpenAlex
W2091550386
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
de
Open access
closed
Locations
Zeitschrift für Religionswissenschaft (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
Keywords
Maitreya, dharma, future Buddha, Buddhist eschatology, Buddhist cosmology, rebirth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review