Cited by 161Statistical Methods and InferenceAdvanced Statistical Methods and ModelsSpatial and Panel Data Analysis

A score based approach to wild bootstrap inference

Kline, Patrick, Santos, Andres·2012·Journal of Econometric Methods

Abstract

We propose a generalization of the wild bootstrap of Wu (1986) and Liu (1988) based upon perturbing the scores of M-estimators. This "score bootstrap" procedure avoids recomputing the estimator in each bootstrap iteration, making it substantially less costly to compute than the conventional nonparametric bootstrap, particularly in complex nonlinear models. Despite this computational advantage, in the linear model, the score bootstrap studentized test statistic is equivalent to that of the conventional wild bootstrap up to order Op(n-1). We establish the consistency of the procedure for Wald and Lagrange Multiplier type tests and tests of moment restrictions for a wide class of M-estimators under clustering and potential misspecification. In an extensive series of Monte Carlo experiments, we find that the performance of the score bootstrap is comparable to competing approaches despite its computational savings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/2156-6674.1006

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The validity of the 'cluster-robust' multiplier bootstrap procedure relies on the number of clusters being 'large.'

    “provided that the number of cluster is 'large.'”

    From Difference-in-Differences with multiple time periods (2021) · cites this paper as Kline and Santos (2012)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kline, P., & Santos, A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Venue
Journal of Econometric Methods
Published
2012-08-24
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
23-41
ISSN
2156-6674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088869467
Cited by
161
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Econometric Methods (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
Keywords
wild bootstrap, M-estimation, bootstrap inference, Wald test, score test, clustering, model misspecification, computational efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review