Cited by 88Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock

Joint analysis of SNP and gene expression data in genetic association studies of complex diseases

Open access
Huang, Yen-Tsung, VanderWeele, Tyler J., Lin, Xihong·2014·The Annals of Applied Statistics

Abstract

Genetic association studies have been a popular approach for assessing the association between common Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) and complex diseases. However, other genomic data involved in the mechanism from SNPs to disease, for example, gene expressions, are usually neglected in these association studies. In this paper, we propose to exploit gene expression information to more powerfully test the association between SNPs and diseases by jointly modeling the relations among SNPs, gene expressions and diseases. We propose a variance component test for the total effect of SNPs and a gene expression on disease risk. We cast the test within the causal mediation analysis framework with the gene expression as a potential mediator. For eQTL SNPs, the use of gene expression information can enhance power to test for the total effect of a SNP-set, which is the combined direct and indirect effects of the SNPs mediated through the gene expression, on disease risk. We show that the test statistic under the null hypothesis follows a mixture of $\chi^{2}$ distributions, which can be evaluated analytically or empirically using the resampling-based perturbation method. We construct tests for each of three disease models that are determined by SNPs only, SNPs and gene expression, or include also their interactions. As the true disease model is unknown in practice, we further propose an omnibus test to accommodate different underlying disease models. We evaluate the finite sample performance of the proposed methods using simulation studies, and show that our proposed test performs well and the omnibus test can almost reach the optimal power where the disease model is known and correctly specified. We apply our method to reanalyze the overall effect of the SNP-set and expression of the ORMDL3 gene on the risk of asthma.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1214/13-aoas690

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mediation analysis was developed to integrate SNP and gene expression data, treating gene expression as the mediator in the causal mechanism from SNPs to disease.

    “For example, a regression-based method termed “mediation analysis” was developed to integrate SNP and gene expression data, treating the gene expression as the mediator in the causal mechanism from SNPs to disease [45, 46].”

    From Multi-omics approaches to disease (2017) · cites this paper as [45]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [27]Pearl J 2001 Direct and indirect effects Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Uncertainty and Artificial Intelligence 411 420 Morgan Kaufmann San Francisco
  2. [32]Rubin D 1978 Bayesian inference for causal effects Annals of Statistics 6 34 58

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, Y.-T., VanderWeele, T. J., & Lin, X.
Affiliations
  • Brown University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
The Annals of Applied Statistics
Published
2014-03-01
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
352-376
ISSN
  • 1932-6157 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-7330
OpenAlex
W1979676475
Cited by
88
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8
FWCI
6.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Annals of Applied Statistics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Project Euclid (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (CA134294., R01CA076404, CA076404, R37CA076404, P01CA134294, R35CA197449)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (P42ES016454, P30ES000002)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Keywords
single nucleotide polymorphisms, gene expression, genetic association, complex diseases, causal mediation analysis, expression quantitative trait loci, perturbation method, omnibus test, gene-environment interaction, asthma, ORMDL3

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review