The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Image Problems: The Origin and Development of the Buddha's Image in Early South Asia
Abstract
This deft and lively study by Robert DeCaroli explores the questions of how and why the earliest verifiable images of the historical Buddha were created. In so doing, DeCaroli steps away from old questions of where and when to present the history of Buddhism’s relationship with figural art as an ongoing set of negotiations within the Buddhist community and in society at large. By comparing innovations in Brahmanical, Jain, and royal artistic practice, DeCaroli examines why no image of the Buddha was made until approximately five hundred years after his death and what changed in the centuries surrounding the start of the Common Era to suddenly make those images desirable and acceptable. The textual and archaeological sources reveal that figural likenesses held special importance in South Asia and were seen as having a significant amount of agency and power. Anxiety over image use extended well beyond the Buddhists, helping to explain why images of Vedic gods, Jain teachers, and political elites also are absent from the material record of the centuries BCE. DeCaroli shows how the emergence of powerful dynasties and rulers, who benefited from novel modes of visual authority, was at the root of the changes in attitude toward figural images. However, as DeCaroli demonstrates, a strain of unease with figural art persisted, even after a tradition of images of the Buddha had become established.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It as a result held deeply embedded associations in society which widely assumed a necessary identity to exist between an image (pratimā) and its subject (pramā); the two, namely, were considered to be one and the same”
From Pleasure and Fear: On the Uneasy Relation between Indic Buddhist Monasticism and Art (2022) · cites this paper as DeCaroli 2015
In the citing paper
“It was at this time also that South Asia bore witness to a great cultural shift towards figural imagery, with representations of deities and spirits from the Graeco, Indic and Iranic pantheons as well as portraiture of rulers appearing for the first time in coinage and sculpture.”
From Pleasure and Fear: On the Uneasy Relation between Indic Buddhist Monasticism and Art (2022) · cites this paper as DeCaroli 2015
In the citing paper
“Brahmanical, Buddhist, and Jain soteriological systems of the early Common Era widely rejected this identity between image and subject, viewing the worldly practices related to them as inconsequential to their ultimate purpose (DeCaroli 2015, esp.54ff).”
From Pleasure and Fear: On the Uneasy Relation between Indic Buddhist Monasticism and Art (2022) · cites this paper as DeCaroli 2015
In the citing paper
“As Robert DeCaroli has detailed, these were by no means the earliest forms of figural imagery, and texts dating from the late Vedic Period make clear that such art had been a widespread feature of culture for a very long time indeed.”
From Pleasure and Fear: On the Uneasy Relation between Indic Buddhist Monasticism and Art (2022) · cites this paper as DeCaroli 2015
In the citing paper
“It imparts, quite plainly, that representations of the Buddha were considered to be nothing more than the materials out of which they were made 64 and thus unrelated in any necessary way to the Buddha himself, neither in essence nor in substance and thus quite unlike relics in this regard.”
From Pleasure and Fear: On the Uneasy Relation between Indic Buddhist Monasticism and Art (2022) · cites this paper as DeCaroli 2015
2 more claims about this paper
Create a free account to see every claim other papers make about this one.
Citations
Cited by
Pleasure and Fear: On the Uneasy Relation between Indic Buddhist Monasticism and Art
Albery, H. (2022) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel13121223 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- DeCaroli, R. D.
- Corresponding author
- DeCaroli, Robert Daniel
- Venue
- University of Washington Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of Washington Press
- Published
- 2015-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W4405340053
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 1.70
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of Washington Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Visual Culture and Art Theory
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Keywords
- historical Buddha, Buddhist iconography, early Buddhism, Jain art, Buddhist communities, South Asia, Buddhist art history
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Image Problems: The Origin and Development of the Buddha's Image in Early South Asia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1515/9780295805795
- The paper
- DeCaroli, R. D. (2015). Image Problems: The Origin and Development of the Buddha's Image in Early South Asia. University of Washington Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780295805795