CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 155

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Field Guide to the Palms of the Americas

Henderson, Andrew, Galeano, Gloria, Bernal, Rodrigo·2019
DOI 10.1515/9780691197708
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This user-friendly and authoritative book will serve scientists, growers, and sightseers as a guide to the 67 genera and 550 species of naturally occurring palms found in the Americas. Its purpose is to give an introduction to the diversity of palms and allow almost anyone to identify a palm from this part of the world. Providing scientifically accurate descriptions and a rich supply of illustrations, including color photos taken in the wild of over 256 species, this guide is extraordinary in its coverage of the plant that has become for many people the …

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/9780691197708

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The different palm increases within 0, 1, and 8 km of the archaeological site might reflect direct enrichment (Attalea) versus indirect enrichment (Astrocaryum) because both genera include palms adapted to fire and open habitats.

    “The different palm increases within 0, 1, and 8 km of the archaeological site might reflect direct enrichment (Attalea) versus indirect enrichment (Astrocaryum) because both genera include palms that are adapted to fire and open habitats”

    From Pre‐contact and post‐colonial ecological legacies shape Surinamese rainforests (2024) · cites this paper as Henderson et al., 2019

  • Increases in SPH_ECH phytoliths within 1 km of the archaeological site could be related to increases in Attalea and Oenocarpus, because these palms are adapted to open conditions and fire.

    “Second, increases in SPH_ECH phytoliths within 1 km of the archaeological site could be related to increases in Attalea and Oenocarpus, because these palms are adapted to open conditions and fire”

    From Pre‐contact and post‐colonial ecological legacies shape Surinamese rainforests (2024) · cites this paper as Henderson et al., 2019

  • In the Surinamese rainforests, SPH_ECH phytoliths are produced by Euterpe, Oenocarpus, Attalea, Hyospathe elegans and Cocos nucifera and Conicals are produced by Astrocaryum, Bactris and Socratea exorrhiza palms.

    “In the Surinamese rainforests, SPH_ECH phytoliths are produced by Euterpe, Oenocarpus, Attalea, Hyospathe elegans and Cocos nucifera and Conicals are produced by Astrocaryum, Bactris and Socratea exorrhiza palms”

    From Phytolith assemblages reflect variability in human land use and the modern environment (2024) · cites this paper as Henderson et al. 2019

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Henderson, A., Galeano, G., & Bernal, R.
Publisher
Princeton University Press
Published
2019-06-03
DOI
10.1515/9780691197708
Cited by
155
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review