Power, Trade, and War
Abstract
This book presents the first attempt to model the relationships among the distribution of power, international trade, and war. Edward Mansfield dispels the widespread belief that a monotonic relationship exists between the distribution of power and patterns of both war and trade.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Illusions of techno-nationalism.
Luo, Y. (2022) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/s41267-021-00468-5 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Conflict, security, and political risk: International business in challenging times
Henisz, W. J., Mansfield, E. D., & Von Glinow, M. A. (2010) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/jibs.2010.11 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Mansfield, E. D.
- Corresponding author
- Mansfield, Edward D.
- ORCID
- Mansfield, Edward D.
- Venue
- Princeton University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Princeton University Press
- Published
- 1995-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W2130207467
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 30.08
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Princeton University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Keywords
- distribution of power, international trade, war, interstate conflict, trade and conflict, international relations theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
