The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Linguistic Awareness in Multilinguals: English as a Third Language
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For some time, researchers have suggested that metalinguistic awareness and language aptitude can be considered partially overlapping constructs (Herdina & Jessner, 2002;Jessner, 2006); consequently, tests of language aptitude and metalinguistic awareness may assess overlapping skills (Ellis, 2004).”
From The prediction from MLAT to L2 achievement is largely due to MLAT assessment of underlying L1 abilities (2023) · cites this paper as Jessner, 2006
In the citing paper
“In some studies, metalinguistic awareness and language learning aptitude have been found to be partially overlapping constructs (e.g., see Jessner, 2006), but others have found that metalinguistic knowledge and language aptitude are distinguishable constructs (Roehr-Brackin, 2018).”
From The prediction from MLAT to L2 achievement is largely due to MLAT assessment of underlying L1 abilities (2023) · cites this paper as Jessner, 2006
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bono, M., & Stratilaki, S. (2009) · International Journal of Multilingualism · doi:10.1080/14790710902846749 · Cited by 71
Research on language teaching and learning in Austria (2004–2009)
Dalton-Puffer, C., Faistauer, R., & Vetter, E. (2011) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444810000418 · Cited by 23
Sparks, R. L., & Dale, P. S. (2023) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263123000037 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Jessner, U.
- Publisher
- Edinburgh University Press
- Published
- 2006-03-15
- Cited by
- 92
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
