The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
Conquest: Sexual Violence and American Indian Genocide
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In settler colonialism, Indigenous peoples have been viewed by settlers as pests to be destroyed so as to enable sole use of their land.”
From An African-centred approach to land education (2014) · cites this paper as Smith 2005
In the citing paper
“The world is ideologically fitted into a settler logic, whereby a superior coloniserendowed with civilisation, science, rule of law, etc.is considered as rightfully ruling over or extirpating an inferior colonised both physically and culturally.”
From An African-centred approach to land education (2014) · cites this paper as Smith 2005
In the citing paper
“The colonised are viewed as people who are deemed not to possess the intrinsically higher qualities of the coloniser, including in their uses of land (Smith 2005).”
From An African-centred approach to land education (2014) · cites this paper as Smith 2005
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pellow, D. N. (2016) · Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race · doi:10.1017/s1742058x1600014x · Cited by 343
New abolition, criminology and a critical carceral studies
Brown, M., & Schept, J. (2017) · Punishment & Society · doi:10.1177/1462474516666281 · Cited by 181
Lajimodiere, D. K. (2013) · Multicultural Perspectives · doi:10.1080/15210960.2013.781391 · Cited by 38
An African-centred approach to land education
Engel-Di Mauro, S., & Carroll, K. K. (2014) · Environmental Education Research · doi:10.1080/13504622.2013.865112 · Cited by 27
Ethnographic Refusal: Anthropological Need
(2014) · Mohawk Interruptus · doi:10.1215/9780822376781-004 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, A.
- Publisher
- Duke University Press
- Published
- 2015-04-24
- Cited by
- 1,410
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
