Cited by 9Indian and Buddhist StudiesChinese history and philosophyStudy and Philosophy of Religion

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Ox-head School of Chinese Ch'an Buddhism: From Early Ch'an to the Golden Age

McRae, John R.·1983·Studies in Ch'an and Hua-Yen

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/9780824840518-005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • After Shenhui, a Chan tradition outside the scheme of the formal patriarchal transmission rose in south-eastern China, namely the Niutou School, named after the mountain on which its purported founder Farong (594-657) had lived.

    “After Shenhui, a Chan tradition outside the scheme of the formal patriarchal transmission rose [65] in south-eastern China, namely the Niutou School 牛頭宗, which got it name after the mountain on which its purported founder Farong 法融 (594-657) had lived.”

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
McRae, J. R.
Corresponding author
McRae, John R.
Venue
Studies in Ch'an and Hua-Yen
Published
1983-12-31
Pages
169-252
OpenAlex
W3169072072
Cited by
7
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
University of Hawaii Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
Keywords
Zen Buddhism, Chinese Buddhist schools, Chinese Buddhism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review