CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 6Indian and Buddhist StudiesChinese history and philosophyStudy and Philosophy of Religion

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Relativity of the Concept of Orthodoxy in Chinese Buddhism: Chih-sheng's Indictment of Shih-li and the Proscription of the Dharma Mirror Sütra

Forte, Antonino·1990·Chinese Buddhist Apocrypha
DOI 10.1515/9780824842611-010
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The Relativity of the Concept of Orthodoxy in Chinese Buddhism: Chih-sheng's Indictment of Shih-li and the Proscription of the Dharma Mirror Sütra was published in Chinese Buddhist Apocrypha on page 239.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/9780824842611-010

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sources name twelve of Devendraprajña's collaborators, and some among them-including Faming, Chuyi, and Huiyan-belonged to the monastery.

    “Sources name twelve of Devendraprajña's collaborators.35 We are not told to what monastery they belonged, but we know that some among the dozen mentionedincluding the previously noted monks Faming, Chuyi, and Huiyanbelonged to our monastery.36”

    From On the origins of the Great Fuxian Monastery 大福先寺 in Luoyang (2015) · cites this paper as [35]

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Forte, A.
Corresponding author
Forte, Antonino
Venue
Chinese Buddhist Apocrypha
Publisher
University of Hawaii Press
Published
1990-12-31
Pages
239-250
DOI
10.1515/9780824842611-010
OpenAlex
W4300553752
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
University of Hawaii Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
Keywords
Chinese Buddhism, orthodoxy, Buddhist apocrypha, Buddhist doctrinal controversy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review