The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Gates of Power: Monks, Courtiers, and Warriors in Premodern Japan
Abstract
The political influence of temples in premodern Japan, most clearly manifested in divine demonstrations—where rowdy monks and shrine servants brought holy symbols to the capital to exert pressure on courtiers—has traditionally been condemned and is poorly understood. In an impressive examination of this intriguing aspect of medieval Japan, the author employs a wide range of previously neglected sources to argue that religious protest was a symptom of political factionalism in the capital rather than its cause. It is his contention that religious violence can be traced primarily to attempts by secular leaders to rearrange religious and political hierarchies to their own advantage, thereby leaving disfavored religious institutions to fend for their accustomed rights and status. In this context, divine demonstrations became the preferred negotiating tool for monastic complexes. For almost three centuries, such strategies allowed a handful of elite temples to maintain enough of an equilibrium to sustain and defend the old style of rulership even against the efforts of the Ashikaga Shogunate in the mid-fourteenth century. By acknowledging temples and monks as legitimate co-rulers, The Gates of Power provides a new synthesis of Japanese rulership from the late Heian (794–1185) to the early Muromachi (1336–1573) eras, offering a unique and comprehensive analysis that brings together the spheres of art, religion, ideas, and politics in medieval Japan.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In the 1280s, Enryakuji servedaspatronto80percentofthelocalsakebrewersandmoney-lenders(Adolphson,2000,p.328).”
From The competitive enforcement of property rights in medieval Japan: The role of temples and monasteries (2009) · cites this paper as Adolphson, 2000, p. 328
In the citing paper
“K¯ ofukuji provided a similar array of services to Nara merchants (Adolphson, 2000, p. 330).”
From The competitive enforcement of property rights in medieval Japan: The role of temples and monasteries (2009) · cites this paper as Adolphson, 2000, p. 330
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Adolphson, M., & Ramseyer, J. M. (2009) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2009.02.016 · Cited by 23
Self-citationManuscript Culture and Chinese Learning in Medieval Kamakura
Steininger, B. (2018) · Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies · doi:10.1353/jas.2018.0027 · Cited by 3
Keyworth, G. A. (2021) · Studies in Chinese Religions · doi:10.1080/23729988.2021.1996973
Enacting Identities: Chōgen, Kujō Kanezane, and the Tōdaiji Great Buddha
Quinter, D. (2025) · History of Religions · doi:10.1086/734104
Metadata
- Authors
- Adolphson, M. S.
- Corresponding author
- Adolphson, Mikael S.
- ORCID
- Adolphson, Mikael S.
- Venue
- University of Hawaii Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of Hawaii Press
- Published
- 2000-08-01
- OpenAlex
- W2062154051
- Cited by
- 83
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 3.07
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of Hawaii Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Japanese History and Culture
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
- Keywords
- religious protest, political factionalism, Ashikaga shogunate, monastic complex, religious violence, Heian period, Muromachi period, religion and politics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.