Monastic Education in Korea
Abstract
What do Buddhist monks learn about Buddhism? Which part of their enormous canonical and non-canonical literature do they choose to focus on as the required curriculum in their training, and what do they elect to leave out? The cultural depository of Buddhism includes some four thousand canonical texts, hundreds of other historical works, modern textbooks, oral traditions, and more recently, an increasingly growing body of online material. The sheer diversity of this mass of information makes the pedagogical choices of monastics worthy of close study. Monastic Education in Korea is essentially a biography of the Korean Buddhist monastic curriculum over the past five centuries. Based on extensive ethnographic work and archival research in Korean monasteries, it illustrates how a particular premodern syllabus was reimagined in the twentieth century to become the sole national Korean monastic pedagogical program—only to be criticized and completely restructured in recent years. Through a detailed analysis of these modifications, the work demonstrates how Korean Buddhist reformers today tend to imitate the educational practices and canonize the textual totems of the contemporary international discipline of Buddhist studies, and how, by doing so, they ultimately transform the local Korean tradition from a particular brand of Chinese-centered scholastic Chan into the inclusive, pluralistic, Indian-focused Buddhism common in English-language introductions to the religion. The book further examines the proliferation of diverse graduate schools for the sangha, as well as the creation of a novel examination system for all monastics. It reveals some of the realities of operating large monastic organizations in contemporary Asia and portrays a living, vibrant Buddhist community that is constantly negotiating with modern values and reformulating its core orthodoxies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Park, C., & Kim, K. (2023) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel14030357 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“…at their parish headquarters before receiving three weeks of in-person training directly from the EDBP before they could qualify for their Novice Ordination ( sami/samini gye ) (For more details on the order’s 1994 reforms, see Kaplan 2020, pp. 66–67; Lee 2018, pp. 191–213; Yoon 2012, pp. 35–63).”
BackgroundInfluentialPark, C., & Kim, K. (2024) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel15060716 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Gradidge, J., & Sepeng, M. S. (2024) · Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education · doi:10.2478/dcse-2024-0019
The Making of a Masterpiece: An Examination of Zimen Jingxun’s Authorship
Lee, C. T. (2023) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel14091201
- Authors
- Kaplan, U.
- Corresponding author
- Kaplan, Uri
- Venue
- University of Hawaii Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of Hawaii Press
- Published
- 2020-06-19
- OpenAlex
- W3036966982
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of Hawaii Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Social Sciences › Education › Religious Education and Schools
- Keywords
- monastic education, Korean Buddhism, Buddhist scriptures, Buddhist studies, Zen Buddhism, Buddhist reform, monastic organization, modernization of Buddhism, Korean Buddhist monasteries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review