Cited by 1,567Chinese history and philosophyPhilosophy and Historical ThoughtIndian and Buddhist Studies

A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy

·1963·Princeton University Press eBooks

Abstract

A monumental compendium of Chinese thought, from pre-Confucianism to Chinese Communism A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy covers the entire historical development of Chinese philosophy from its ancient origins to today, providing the most wide-ranging and authoritative English-language anthology of Chinese thought available. This superb book brings together key selections from all the great thinkers and schools in every period—ancient, medieval, modern, and contemporary—and presents these texts in their entirety. Each selection is accompanied by explanatory aids and scholarly documentation that shed invaluable light on all aspects of Chinese thought. Featuring elegant and faithful translations of some of the most important classical writings, some translated here for the first time, A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy is an indispensable resource for students, scholars, and anyone interested in Chinese philosophy and culture.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/9781400820030

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The all-encompassing undifferentiated One paradoxically remained in existence along with the products of its differentiation.

    “The all-encompassing undifferentiated One paradoxically remained in existence along with the products of its differentiation (Chan 1963:493).”

    From Chinese Hierarchy in Comparative Perspective (1989) · cites this paper as Chan 1963:493

  • All things were consubstantial.

    “Therefore, all things were consubstantial (Gernet 1985:201; Chan 1963:497-98).”

    From Chinese Hierarchy in Comparative Perspective (1989) · cites this paper as Chan 1963:497-98

  • The relationship between parents and child was one of asymmetrical mutual dependence.

    “This relationship between parents and child was one of asymmetrical mutual dependence.”

    From Chinese Hierarchy in Comparative Perspective (1989) · cites this paper as Chan 1963:274–75

  • Neo-Confucian meditation and mystical holism were especially inspired or intensified by the example of Chan Buddhism.

    “Neo-Confucian meditation and mystical holism were especially inspired or intensified by the example of Chan Buddhism (Chan 1963:429–30; Ching 1986).”

    From Chinese Hierarchy in Comparative Perspective (1989) · cites this paper as Chan 1963:429–30

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Venue
Princeton University Press eBooks
Published
1963-12-31
OpenAlex
W2004679316
Cited by
1,567
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 134 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 101 · 2013: 72 · 2012: 59
FWCI
8.39
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Princeton University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Chinese history and philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Historical Thought
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
Keywords
Chinese philosophy, Confucianism, Daoism, Chinese communism, Chinese classics, translation of Chinese classics, Chinese intellectual history

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review