The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations
Abstract
This book seeks to explain why different systems of sovereign states have built different types of fundamental institutions to govern interstate relations. Why, for example, did the ancient Greeks operate a successful system of third-party arbitration, while international society today rests on a combination of international law and multilateral diplomacy? Why did the city-states of Renaissance Italy develop a system of oratorical diplomacy, while the states of absolutist Europe relied on naturalist international law and "old diplomacy"? Conventional explanations of basic institutional practices have difficulty accounting for such variation. Christian Reus-Smit addresses this problem by presenting an alternative, "constructivist" theory of international institutional development, one that emphasizes the relationship between the social identity of the state and the nature and origin of basic institutional practices. Reus-Smit argues that international societies are shaped by deep constitutional structures that are based on prevailing beliefs about the moral purpose of the state, the organizing principle of sovereignty, and the norm of procedural justice. These structures inform the imaginations of institutional architects as they develop and adjust institutional arrangements between states. As he shows with detailed reference to ancient Greece, Renaissance Italy, absolutist Europe, and the modern world, different cultural and historical contexts lead to profoundly different constitutional structures and institutional practices. The first major study of its kind, this book is a significant addition to our theoretical and empirical understanding of international relations, past and present.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Legitimacy in intergovernmental and non-state global governance
Bernstein, S. (2011) · Review of International Political Economy · doi:10.1080/09692290903173087 · Cited by 567
International Crises of Legitimacy
Reus-Smit, C. (2007) · International Politics · doi:10.1057/palgrave.ip.8800182 · Cited by 403
Self-citationThe Making of Global International Relations: Origins and Evolution of IR at its Centenary
Acharya, A., & Buzan, B. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781108647670 · Cited by 375
Subsistence protection and mitigation ambition: Necessities, economic and climatic
Shue, H. (2019) · The British Journal of Politics and International Relations · doi:10.1177/1369148118819071 · Cited by 59
Kaplan, Y. (2022) · Globalizations · doi:10.1080/14747731.2022.2068235 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Reus-Smit, C.
- Venue
- Princeton University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Princeton University Press
- Published
- 2009-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W2798803103
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.83
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1515/9781400823253
- The paper
- Reus-Smit, C. (2009). The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations. Princeton University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400823253
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.