Cited by 59Climate Change Policy and EconomicsInternational Environmental Law and PoliciesClimate Change and Sustainable Development

Subsistence protection and mitigation ambition: Necessities, economic and climatic

Shue, Henry·2019·The British Journal of Politics and International Relations

Abstract

The distinction between subsistence emissions and luxury emissions was originally devised in 1992 to guard people so poor as to be able to afford only fossil fuels from being priced out of energy by market mechanisms like cap-and-trade that were proposed to assist with limiting climate change. Non-carbon energy can now be made as affordable and accessible as fossil fuel, but tensions remain between measures to support sustainable development and measures to control climate change. Consequently, the distinction between subsistence energy and luxury energy continues to be surprisingly relevant to current international political struggles. The most fully justified method for normative assessment of Nationally Determined Contributions under the Paris Agreement, the Climate Equity Reference Framework, presupposes the distinction. Normative evaluation of the choice between maximally ambitious ratcheting-up of Nationally Determined Contributions in the immediate future and lazy reliance upon hoped-for carbon dioxide removal in future decades depends on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1369148118819071

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The challenge of tackling embodied emissions in trade is confronted with various temporal and spatial inequities.

    “The challenge of tackling embodied emissions in trade is confronted with various temporal and spatial inequities (see Section 2.3) (14, 25, 145-150).”

    From Carbon Leakage, Consumption, and Trade (2022) · cites this paper as [146]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shue, H.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Shue, Henry
Venue
The British Journal of Politics and International Relations
Published
2019-02-19
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
251-262
ISSN
  • 1369-1481 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-856X
OpenAlex
W2915115442
Cited by
59
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7
FWCI
7.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The British Journal of Politics and International Relations (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › International Environmental Law and Policies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Sustainable Development
Keywords
Nationally Determined Contributions, Paris Agreement, carbon dioxide removal, emissions trading, energy affordability, sustainable development, climate equity, international climate policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review