Cited by 62Biblical Studies and InterpretationReligion, Theology, History, Judaism, ChristianityHistorical and Linguistic Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Jesus in the Talmud

Schäfer, Peter·2009·Princeton University Press eBooks

Abstract

Scattered throughout the Talmud, the founding document of rabbinic Judaism in late antiquity, can be found quite a few references to Jesus--and they're not flattering. In this lucid, richly detailed, and accessible book, Peter Schäfer examines how the rabbis of the Talmud read, understood, and used the New Testament Jesus narrative to assert, ultimately, Judaism's superiority over Christianity. The Talmudic stories make fun of Jesus' birth from a virgin, fervently contest his claim to be the Messiah and Son of God, and maintain that he was rightfully executed as a blasphemer and idolater. They subvert the Christian idea of Jesus' resurrection and insist he got the punishment he deserved in hell--and that a similar fate awaits his followers. Schäfer contends that these stories betray a remarkable familiarity with the Gospels--especially Matthew and John--and represent a deliberate and sophisticated anti-Christian polemic that parodies the New Testament narratives. He carefully distinguishes between Babylonian and Palestinian sources, arguing that the rabbis' proud and self-confident countermessage to that of the evangelists was possible only in the unique historical setting of Persian Babylonia, in a Jewish community that lived in relative freedom. The same could not be said of Roman and Byzantine Palestine, where the Christians aggressively consolidated their political power and the Jews therefore suffered. A departure from past scholarship, which has played down the stories as unreliable distortions of the historical Jesus, Jesus in the Talmud posits a much more deliberate agenda behind these narratives.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/9781400827619

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ibn Hazm argued that Jesus was crucified and died on the Cross, but his body was then taken up to heaven and replaced with a substitute.

    “Ibn Hazm argues that Jesus was crucified and died on the Cross, but his body was then taken up to heaven and replaced with a substitute.”

    From Revisiting the Crucifixion of Jesus within Islam (2024) · cites this paper as [33]

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Schäfer, P.
Corresponding author
Schäfer, Peter
Venue
Princeton University Press eBooks
Published
2009-12-31
OpenAlex
W606958221
Cited by
62
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
40.58
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Princeton University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Historical and Linguistic Studies
Keywords
Talmud, Jesus Christ, rabbinic Judaism, anti-Christian polemic, New Testament narrative, Gospels, Matthew, John, virgin birth, messianism, resurrection, blasphemy, Babylonian Talmud, Jerusalem Talmud, Judaism and Christianity, late antiquity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review