The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Kepler's Philosophy and the New Astronomy
Abstract
Johannes Kepler contributed importantly to every field he addressed. He changed the face of astronomy by abandoning principles that had been in place for two millennia, made important discoveries in optics and mathematics, and was an uncommonly good philosopher. Generally, however, Kepler's philosophical ideas have been dismissed as irrelevant and even detrimental to his legacy of scientific accomplishment. Here, Rhonda Martens offers the first extended study of Kepler's philosophical views and shows how those views helped him construct and justify the new astronomy. Martens notes that since Kepler became a Copernican before any empirical evidence supported Copernicus over the entrenched Ptolemaic system, his initial reasons for preferring Copernicanism were not telescope observations but rather methodological and metaphysical commitments. Further, she shows that Kepler's metaphysics supported the strikingly modern view of astronomical method that led him to discover the three laws of planetary motion and to wed physics and astronomy--a key development in the scientific revolution. By tracing the evolution of Kepler's thought in his astronomical, metaphysical, and epistemological works, Martens explores the complex interplay between changes in his philosophical views and the status of his astronomical discoveries. She shows how Kepler's philosophy paved the way for the discovery of elliptical orbits and provided a defense of physical astronomy's methodological soundness. In doing so, Martens demonstrates how an empirical discipline was inspired and profoundly shaped by philosophical assumptions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
On the Need to Rewrite the History of Greek Mathematics
Unguru, S. (2004) · Boston studies in the philosophy of science · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-2640-9_22 · Cited by 155
Die Lehre von den Kegelschnitten im Altertum
Zeuthen, H. G. (1886) · doi:10.3931/e-rara-77334 · Cited by 44
History of Greek Mathematics: A Survey of Recent Research [1984]
Berggren, J. L. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-36736-6_1 · Cited by 21
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Emergence of a Scientific Culture
Gaukroger, S. W. (2006) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199296446.001.0001 · Cited by 328
Kepler's Move from Orbs to Orbits: Documenting a Revolutionary Scientific Concept
Goldstein, B. R., & Hon, G. (2005) · Perspectives on Science · doi:10.1162/1063614053714126 · Cited by 50
Donahue, W. H. (2006) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/chol9780521572446.025 · Cited by 31
Kepler’s optics without hypotheses
Dupré, S. (2011) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-011-9977-6 · Cited by 29
Representing Space in the Scientific Revolution
Miller, D. M. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107110656 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Martens, R.
- Corresponding author
- Martens, Rhonda
- ORCID
- Martens, Rhonda
- Venue
- Princeton University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Princeton University Press
- Published
- 2001-01-01
- OpenAlex
- W1489712611
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.95
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Princeton University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Historical Philosophy and Science
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › History and Developments in Astronomy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › History of Science and Medicine
- Keywords
- Johannes Kepler, Copernicanism, Ptolemaic system, metaphysics, epistemology, astronomical methods, eccentric orbits, physical astronomy, scientific revolution, philosophy of science, optics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Kepler's Philosophy and the New Astronomy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1515/9781400831098
- The paper
- Martens, R. (2001). Kepler's Philosophy and the New Astronomy. Princeton University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400831098