The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Remaking Women: Feminism and Modernity in the Middle East
Abstract
Contrary to popular perceptions, newly veiled women across the Middle East are just as much products and symbols of modernity as the upper- and middle-class women who courageously took off the veil almost a century ago. To make this point, these essays focus on the "woman question" in the Middle East (most particularly in Egypt and Iran), especially at the turn of the century, when gender became a highly charged nationalist issue tied up in complex ways with the West. The last two decades have witnessed an extraordinary burst of energy and richness in Middle East women's studies, and the contributors to this volume exemplify the vitality of this new thinking. They take up issues of concern to historians and social thinkers working on the postcolonial world. The essays challenge the assumptions of other major works on women and feminism in the Middle East by questioning, among other things, the familiar dichotomy in which women's domesticity is associated with tradition and modernity with their entry into the public sphere. Indeed, Remaking Women is a radical challenge to any easy equation of modernity with progress, emancipation, and the empowerment of women. The contributors are Lila Abu-Lughod, Marilyn Booth, Deniz Kandiyoti, Khaled Fahmy, Mervat Hatem, Afsaneh Najmabadi, Omnia Shakry, and Zohreh T. Sullivan.The book is introduced by the editor with a piece called "Feminist Longings and Postcolonial Conditions," which masterfully interfaces the critical studies of feminism and modernism with scholarship on South Asia and the Middle East.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Imperialist feminisms -think of feminist global interventionism, histories of”
From Introduction (2022) · cites this paper as Abu-Lughod (1998: 14)
In the citing paper
“If trans-exclusionary politics of various kinds -including a generalized rhetoric voicing supposed concern over the well-being of people who might be referred to as”
From Introduction (2022) · cites this paper as [1]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Abu‐Lughod, L. (2002) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1525/aa.2002.104.3.783 · Cited by 2,371
Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide
Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511791017 · Cited by 1,795
“Under Western Eyes” Revisited: Feminist Solidarity through Anticapitalist Struggles
Mohanty, C. T. (2003) · Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society · doi:10.1086/342914 · Cited by 1,413
Diversity and Self-Determination in International Law
Knop, K. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511494024 · Cited by 334
Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2004) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511791017.002 · Cited by 230
Metadata
- Venue
- Princeton University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Princeton University Press
- Published
- 1998-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W4242612339
- Cited by
- 618
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 38
- FWCI
- 6.75
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Princeton University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Islamic Studies and History
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Historical Gender and Feminism Studies
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender
- Keywords
- veiling, women's question, modernity, gender and nationalism, feminism, postcolonialism, women's domesticity, women's public sphere, women's history, Egypt, Iran, Middle East, Western influence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review