CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 325Psychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentPhilosophical Ethics and TheoryNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us about Morality

Churchland, Patricia S.·2011·Princeton University Press eBooks
DOI 10.1515/9781400838080
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

What is morality? Where does it come from? And why do most of us heed its call most of the time? In Braintrust , neurophilosophy pioneer Patricia Churchland argues that morality originates in the biology of the brain. She describes the "neurobiological platform of bonding" that, modified by evolutionary pressures and cultural values, has led to human styles of moral behavior. The result is a provocative genealogy of morals that asks us to reevaluate the priority given to religion, absolute rules, and pure reason in accounting for the basis of morality. Moral values, Churchland argues, are rooted in a behavior common to all mammals--the caring for offspring. The evolved structure, processes, and chemistry of the brain incline humans to strive not only for self-preservation but for the well-being of allied selves--first offspring, then mates, kin, and so on, in wider and wider "caring" circles. Separation and exclusion cause pain, and the company of loved ones causes pleasure; responding to feelings of social pain and pleasure, brains adjust their circuitry to local customs. In this way, caring is apportioned, conscience molded, and moral intuitions instilled. A key part of the story is oxytocin, an ancient body-and-brain molecule that, by decreasing the stress response, allows humans to develop the trust in one another necessary for the development of close-knit ties, social institutions, and morality. A major new account of what really makes us moral, Braintrust challenges us to reconsider the origins of some of our most cherished values.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/9781400838080

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Churchland, P. S.
Corresponding author
Churchland, Patricia S.
ORCID
Churchland, Patricia S.
Venue
Princeton University Press eBooks
Publisher
Princeton University Press
Published
2011-12-31
DOI
10.1515/9781400838080
OpenAlex
W4235857332
Cited by
325
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 27
FWCI
9.78
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Princeton University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Keywords
origin of morality, neurobiology of morality, social bonding, oxytocin, kin selection, moral intuitions, conscience, evolution of morality, religion and morality, moral absolutism, trust, Patricia Churchland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review