The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Local Histories/Global Designs: Coloniality, Subaltern Knowledges, and Border Thinking
Abstract
This book is an extended argument about the “coloniality” of power. In a shrinking world where sharp dichotomies, such as East/West and developing/developed, blur and shift, this book points to the inadequacy of current practices in the social sciences and area studies. It explores the crucial notion of “colonial difference” in the study of the modern colonial world and traces the emergence of an epistemic shift, which the book calls “border thinking.” Further, the book expands the horizons of those debates already under way in postcolonial studies of Asia and Africa by dwelling on the genealogy of thoughts of South/Central America, the Caribbean, and Latino/as in the United States. The book's concept of “border gnosis,” or sensing and knowing by dwelling in imperial/colonial borderlands, counters the tendency of occidentalist perspectives to manage, and thus limit, understanding. A new preface discusses this book as a dialogue with Hegel's Philosophy of History .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wynter, S. (2003) · CR: The New Centennial Review · doi:10.1353/ncr.2004.0015 · Cited by 5,753
Unsettling race and language: Toward a raciolinguistic perspective
Rosa, J., & Flores, N. (2017) · Language in Society · doi:10.1017/s0047404517000562 · Cited by 1,675
The Geopolitics of Knowledge and the Colonial Difference
Mignolo, W. D. (2002) · South Atlantic Quarterly · doi:10.1215/00382876-101-1-57 · Cited by 1,243
Self-citationDecolonial AI: Decolonial Theory as Sociotechnical Foresight in Artificial Intelligence
Mohamed, S., Png, M.-T., & Isaac, W. (2020) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-020-00405-8 · Cited by 912
Disinventing and (Re)Constituting Languages
Makoni, S., & Pennycook, A. (2005) · Critical Inquiry in Language Studies · doi:10.1207/s15427595cils0203_1 · Cited by 772
Metadata
- Authors
- Mignolo, W. D.
- Venue
- Princeton University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Princeton University Press
- Published
- 2012-08-26
- OpenAlex
- W2251170015
- Cited by
- 463
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.92
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Local Histories/Global Designs: Coloniality, Subaltern Knowledges, and Border Thinking. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.23943/princeton/9780691156095.001.0001
- The paper
- Mignolo, W. D. (2012). Local Histories/Global Designs: Coloniality, Subaltern Knowledges, and Border Thinking. Princeton University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691156095.001.0001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.