The Origins of Monsters: Image and Cognition in the First Age of Mechanical Reproduction
Abstract
It has often been claimed that “monsters”—supernatural creatures with bodies composed from multiple species—play a significant part in the thought and imagery of all people from all times. This book advances an alternative view. Composite figurations are intriguingly rare and isolated in the art of the prehistoric era. Instead it was with the rise of cities, elites, and cosmopolitan trade networks that “monsters” became widespread features of visual production in the ancient world. Showing how these fantastic images originated and how they were transmitted, this book identifies patterns in the records of human image-making and embarks on a search for connections between mind and culture. It asks: Can cognitive science explain the potency of such images? Does evolutionary psychology hold a key to understanding the transmission of symbols? How is our making and perception of images influenced by institutions and technologies? The book considers the work of art in the first age of mechanical reproduction, which it locates in the Middle East, where urban life began. Comparing the development and spread of fantastic imagery across a range of prehistoric and ancient societies, including Mesopotamia, Egypt, Greece, and China, the book explores how the visual imagination has been shaped by a complex mixture of historical and universal factors. Examining the reasons behind the dissemination of monstrous imagery in ancient states and empires, it sheds light on the relationship between…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ceremonial objects incorporated supernatural composite images such as serpopards and winged griffins appropriated from Near Eastern glyptic representations, whereas earlier visual culture themes were drawn from the known world.
“Whereas themes of visual culture, such as those on decorated pottery, had previously been drawn from the known world, these ceremonial objects incorporated supernatural, composite images, such as serpopards and winged griffins, appropriated from Near Eastern glyptic representations (Wengrow 2013).”
From The Egyptian Predynastic and State Formation (2016) · cites this paper as Wengrow 2013
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Egyptian Predynastic and State Formation
Stevenson, A. (2016) · Journal of Archaeological Research · doi:10.1007/s10814-016-9094-7 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
“Whereas themes of visual culture, such as those on decorated pottery, had previously been drawn from the known world, these ceremonial objects incorporated supernatural, composite images, such as serpopards and winged griffins, appropriated from Near Eastern glyptic representations (Wengrow 2013).”
Background
- Authors
- Wengrow, D.
- Corresponding author
- Wengrow, David
- ORCID
- Wengrow, David
- Venue
- Princeton University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Princeton University Press
- Published
- 2013-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W3154771081
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 8.71
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Princeton University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Visual Culture and Art Theory
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › General Arts and Humanities › Cultural and Mythological Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Near East History
- Keywords
- monsters, fantastic imagery, prehistoric art, urbanization, evolutionary psychology, mechanical reproduction, Mesopotamia, ancient Egypt, ancient Greece, ancient China, culture and cognition, image-making
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review