The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem: Reconstructing Individual Behavior from Aggregate Data
Abstract
This book provides a solution to the ecological inference problem, which has plagued users of statistical methods for over seventy-five years: How can researchers reliably infer individual-level behavior from aggregate (ecological) data? In political science, this question arises when individual-level surveys are unavailable (for instance, local or comparative electoral politics), unreliable (racial politics), insufficient (political geography), or infeasible (political history). This ecological inference problem also confronts researchers in numerous areas of major significance in public policy, and other academic disciplines, ranging from epidemiology and marketing to sociology and quantitative history. Although many have attempted to make such cross-level inferences, scholars agree that all existing methods yield very inaccurate conclusions about the world. In this volume, Gary King lays out a unique--and reliable--solution to this venerable problem. King begins with a qualitative overview, readable even by those without a statistical background. He then unifies the apparently diverse findings in the methodological literature, so that only one aggregation problem remains to be solved. He then presents his solution, as well as empirical evaluations of the solution that include over 16,000 comparisons of his estimates from real aggregate data to the known individual-level answer. The method works in practice. King's solution to the ecological inference problem will enable empirical researchers to investigate substantive questions that have heretofore proved unanswerable, and move forward fields of inquiry in which progress has been stifled by this problem.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Modeling Multilevel Data Structures
Steenbergen, M. R., & Jones, B. S. (2002) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/3088424 · Cited by 1,503
Faculty do Matter: The Role of College Faculty in Student Learning and Engagement
Umbach, P. D., & Wawrzynski, M. R. (2005) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s11162-004-1598-1 · Cited by 1,048
Scaling Down: The Subnational Comparative Method
Snyder, R. (2001) · Studies in Comparative International Development · doi:10.1007/bf02687586 · Cited by 1,002
Enhancing the Validity and Cross-Cultural Comparability of Measurement in Survey Research
KING, G., MURRAY, C. J. L., SALOMON, J. A., & TANDON, A. (2004) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s000305540400108x · Cited by 962
Self-citationFujiwara, T., & Kawachi, I. (2008) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.04.015 · Cited by 934
Metadata
- Authors
- King, G.
- Venue
- Princeton University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Princeton University Press
- Published
- 2013-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W1995297713
- Cited by
- 641
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 62.05
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem: Reconstructing Individual Behavior from Aggregate Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1515/9781400849208
- The paper
- King, G. (2013). A Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem: Reconstructing Individual Behavior from Aggregate Data. Princeton University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400849208
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.