The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Islam and the Challenge of Democracy: A Boston Review Book
Abstract
The events of September 11 and the subsequent war on terrorism have provoked widespread discussion about the possibility of democracy in the Islamic world. Such topics as the meaning of jihad, the role of clerics as authoritative interpreters, and the place of human rights and toleration in Islam have become subjects of urgent public debate around the world. With few exceptions, however, this debate has proceeded in isolation from the vibrant traditions of argument within Islamic theology, philosophy, and law. Islam and the Challenge of Democracy aims to correct this deficiency. The book engages the reader in a rich discourse on the challenges of democracy in contemporary Islam. The collection begins with a lead essay by Khaled Abou El Fadl, who argues that democracy, especially a constitutional democracy that protects basic individual rights, is the form of government best suited to promoting a set of social and political values central to Islam. Because Islam is about submission to God and about each individual's responsibility to serve as His agent on Earth, Abou El Fadl argues, there is no place for the subjugation to human authority demanded by authoritarian regimes. The lead essay is followed by eleven others from internationally respected specialists in democracy and religion. They address, challenge, and engage Abou El Fadl's work. The contributors include John Esposito, Muhammad Fadel, Noah Feldman, Nader Hashemi, Bernard Haykel, Muqtedar Khan, Saba Mahmood, David Novak, William Quandt, Kevin Reinhart, and Jeremy Waldron.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“I want to show that Montazeri can be considered a Wasatiyyah thinker because, like Khaled Abou El Fadl (Abou El Fadl 2004, 2013), one of the prominent thinkers of the Wasatiyyah school, he emphasizes existing values in the religious tradition in order to support arguments in favor of human rights.”
From Wasatiyya Discourse in Shi’i Islam: Ayatollah Montazeri and Human Rights Jurisprudence (2022) · cites this paper as Abou El Fadl 2004
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
March, A. F. (2015) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-082112-141250 · Cited by 78
Wasatiyya Discourse in Shi’i Islam: Ayatollah Montazeri and Human Rights Jurisprudence
Ghobadzadeh, N. (2022) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel13020126 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Abou El Fadl, K.
- Venue
- Princeton University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Princeton University Press
- Published
- 2004-01-01
- OpenAlex
- W2106461886
- Cited by
- 92
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 6.19
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Princeton University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Islamic Studies and History
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender
- Social Sciences › Law › Religious Freedom and Discrimination
- Keywords
- democracy, Islam, Islamic political thought, constitutional democracy, individual rights, jihad, ecclesiastical authority, human rights, toleration, authoritarianism, religion and politics, Islamic law, Islamic theology, Islamic philosophy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Islam and the Challenge of Democracy: A Boston Review Book. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1515/9781400873203
- The paper
- Abou El Fadl, K. (2004). Islam and the Challenge of Democracy: A Boston Review Book. Princeton University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400873203