Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The decline in Republican support for governmental regulation of the economy reflects economic system justification, that is, the conservative defence of increasing inequality as fair and legitimate under the neoliberal regime.
“Presumably, this reflects economic system justification, that is, the conservative defence of increasing inequality as fair and legitimate under the neoliberal regime101,107,176–181.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [177]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 170
- Authors
- Bartels, L. M.
- Corresponding author
- Bartels, Larry M.
- ORCID
- Bartels, Larry M.
- Venue
- Princeton University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Princeton University Press
- Published
- 2016-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W4249279108
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 22.43
- Type
- book
- Language
- fr
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Princeton University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
- Keywords
- inequality, democracy, political inequality, social inequality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
