26. Journalism, Gender, and Race
Abstract
This chapter intersects various theoretical perspectives, including hegemony, racial formation, and feminist studies, with journalism studies on race and gender. Situating journalism studies within political, cultural, and sociological understandings reveals scholars’ primary concerns. Scholarly conversations have primarily focused on the production of news, content, and audiences’ perceptions. Within analyses about journalistic values, norms and routines, there are questions about the impact that practices have on representation and public perception, particularly in relation to crime and violence. Overall, this chapter seeks to underscore the theoretical underpinnings that reveal the role journalism plays in maintaining and reifying raced and gendered norms.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The media's reportage of political and the everyday life has relied on expert sources in power, further legitimizing and reinforcing hegemonic ideas about race, gender, and class.
“The media's reportage of political and the everyday life has relied on expert sources in power, further legitimizing and reinforcing hegemonic ideas about race, gender, and class (Mislán, 2018;Tankard, 2001).”
From The memeification of "woke culture": a multimodal critical discourse analysis of its articulation in Essence; O, The Oprah Magazine; and Teen Vogue (2023) · cites this paper as Mislán, 2018
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lenoir, L. D. (2023) · University of Missouri Dissertation · doi:10.32469/10355/94284 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mislán, C.
- Venue
- Journalism
- Publisher
- De Gruyter
- Published
- 2018-05-22
- Pages
- 511-530
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
