The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Who Wrote the Book of Life?: A History of the Genetic Code
Abstract
This is a detailed history of one of the most important and dramatic episodes in modern science, recounted from the novel vantage point of the dawn of the information age and its impact on representations of nature, heredity, and society. Drawing on archives, published sources, and interviews, the author situates work on the genetic code (1953-70) within the history of life science, the rise of communication technosciences (cybernetics, information theory, and computers), the intersection of molecular biology with cryptanalysis and linguistics, and the social history of postwar Europe and the United States. Kay draws out the historical specificity in the process by which the central biological problem of DNA-based protein synthesis came to be metaphorically represented as an information code and a writing technology—and consequently as a “book of life.” This molecular writing and reading is part of the cultural production of the Nuclear Age, its power amplified by the centuries-old theistic resonance of the “book of life” metaphor. Yet, as the author points out, these are just metaphors: analogies, not ontologies. Necessary and productive as they have been, they have their epistemological limitations. Deploying analyses of language, cryptology, and information theory, the author persuasively argues that, technically speaking, the genetic code is not a code, DNA is not a language, and the genome is not an information system (objections voiced by experts as early as the 1950s). Thus her historical reconstruction and analyses also serve as a critique of the new genomic biopower. Genomic textuality has become a fact of life, a metaphor literalized, she claims, as human genome projects promise new levels of control over life through the meta-level of information: control of the word (the DNA sequences) and its editing and rewriting. But the author shows how the humbling limits of these scriptural metaphors also pose a challenge to the textual and material mastery of the genomic “book of life.”
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Landecker, H., & Panofsky, A. (2013) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145707 · Cited by 465
Stem Cells, Tissue Cultures and the Production of Biovalue
Waldby, C. (2002) · Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine · doi:10.1177/136345930200600304 · Cited by 431
Li, S.-C. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.2.171 · Cited by 287
‘Tortoises all the way down’: Geertz, cybernetics and ‘culture’ at the end of the Cold War
Paidipaty, P. (2020) · Anthropological Theory · doi:10.1177/1463499619899747 · Cited by 18
Gerontas, A. K. (2026) · Foundations of Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s10698-026-09569-1
Metadata
- Authors
- Kay, L. E.
- Venue
- Stanford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Stanford University Press
- Published
- 2000-03-01
- OpenAlex
- W4298309871
- Cited by
- 783
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.24
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Who Wrote the Book of Life?: A History of the Genetic Code. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1515/9781503617575
- The paper
- Kay, L. E. (2000). Who Wrote the Book of Life?: A History of the Genetic Code. Stanford University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503617575
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.