The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Reality of the Mass Media
Abstract
In The Reality of the Mass Media, Luhmann extends his theory of social systems—applied in his earlier works to the economy, the political system, art, religion, the sciences, and law—to an examination of the role of mass media in the construction of social reality. Luhmann argues that the system of mass media is a set of recursive, self-referential programs of communication, whose functions are not determined by the external values of truthfulness, objectivity, or knowledge, nor by specific social interests or political directives. Rather, he contends that the system of mass media is regulated by the internal code information/noninformation, which enables the system to select its information (news) from its own environment and to communicate this information in accordance with its own reflexive criteria. Despite its self-referential quality, Luhmann describes the mass media as one of the key cognitive systems of modern society, by means of which society constructs the illusion of its own reality. The reality of mass media, he argues, allows societies to process information without destabilizing social roles or overburdening social actors. It forms a broad reservoir (memory) of options for the future coordination of action, and it provides parameters for the stabilization of political reproduction of society, as it produces a continuous self-description of the world around which modern society can orient itself. In his discussion of mass media, Luhmann elaborates a theory of communication in which communication is seen not as the act of a particular consciousness, nor the medium of integrative social norms, but merely the technical codes through which systemic operations arrange and perpetuate themselves.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Maintaining Legitimacy: Controversies, Orders of Worth, and Public Justifications
Patriotta, G., Gond, J., & Schultz, F. (2011) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00990.x · Cited by 494
Convergence: News Production in a Digital Age
Klinenberg, E. (2005) · The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/0002716204270346 · Cited by 328
Can social systems be autopoietic? Assessing Luhmann's social theory
Mingers, J. (2002) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1111/1467-954x.00367 · Cited by 160
Gaudenzi, S. (2013) · Goldsmiths, University of London · doi:10.25602/gold.00007997 · Cited by 132
Bornmann, L. (2017) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-016-9995-x · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- Luhmann, N.
- Venue
- Stanford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Stanford University Press
- Published
- 2000-07-01
- OpenAlex
- W1572762471
- Cited by
- 829
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.23
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Reality of the Mass Media. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1515/9781503619227
- The paper
- Luhmann, N. (2000). The Reality of the Mass Media. Stanford University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503619227
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.