CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 160Contemporary Sociological Theory and PracticeGerman Social Sciences and HistoryComplex Systems and Dynamics

Can social systems be autopoietic? Assessing Luhmann's social theory

Mingers, John·2002·The Sociological Review
DOI 10.1111/1467-954x.00367
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The theory of autopoiesis, that is systems that are self-producing or self-constructing, was originally developed to explain the particular nature of living as opposed to non-living entities. It was subsequently enlarged to encompass cognition and language leading to what is known as second-order cybernetics. However, as with earlier biological theories, many authors have tried to extend the domain of the theory to encompass social systems, the most notable being Luhmann. The purpose of this article is to consider critically the extent to which the theory of autopoiesis, as originally defined, can be applied to social systems – that is, whether social systems are autopoietic. And, if it cannot, whether some weaker version might be appropriate.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-954x.00367

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Feedback controls in biological organisms or cultural systems implement and maintain organization and purposiveness.

    “Feedback controls in biological organisms or cultural systems implement and maintain organization and purposiveness: ' in the social world . . . we see many groupings -families, companies, religions, cultures and societies -that exhibit long-term stability and persistence despite enormous changes in their environment, and their own internal membership and structure ' (Mingers 2002: 281).”

    From Religion as a Complex and Dynamic System (2013) · cites this paper as Mingers 2002: 281

  • Autopoietic systems are self-producing; contingently maintained; structurally open but organizationally closed; structurally determined; able to be structurally coupled to other systems by mutual specification and/or co-evolution; and able to embrace embodied cognition and self-reference/recursion to enable self-construction/production.

    “These systems are: self-producing; contingently maintained (so that they don't breakdown); structurally open but organizationally closed; structurally determined; able to be structurally coupled to other systems by mutual specification and/or co-evolution; and able to embrace embodied cognition and self-reference/recursion to enable self-construction/production (Mingers, 2002, p. 280).”

    From Climate change and COP26: Are digital technologies and information management part of the problem or the solution? An editorial reflection and call to action (2022) · cites this paper as Mingers, 2002

  • This can be achieved through the nature and dynamics of autopoiesis or self-producing/constructing physical systems.

    “This can be achieved through the nature and dynamics of autopoiesis or self-producing/constructing physical systems (Bunker et al., 2013;Mingers, 2002Mingers, , 2004)).”

    From Climate change and COP26: Are digital technologies and information management part of the problem or the solution? An editorial reflection and call to action (2022) · cites this paper as Mingers, 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Mingers, J.
Affiliations
University of Warwick (GB)
Corresponding author
Mingers, John
ORCID
Mingers, John
Venue
The Sociological Review
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2002-05
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
278-299
ISSN
  • 0038-0261 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-954X
DOI
10.1111/1467-954x.00367
OpenAlex
W1978626743
Cited by
160
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
FWCI
11.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • The Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › German Social Sciences and History
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Systems and Dynamics
Keywords
autopoiesis, social systems, Niklas Luhmann, second-order cybernetics, self-production, social theory, systems theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review