Cited by 1,117Evolution and Genetic DynamicsPhilosophy of Biology and Scientific ExplanationEvolution and Paleontology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Coevolution: Genes, Culture, and Human Diversity

Durham, William H.·1991·Stanford University Press eBooks

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/9781503621534

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 901–1,000 of 1,000

Metadata

Authors
Durham, W. H.
Corresponding author
Durham, William H.
Venue
Stanford University Press eBooks
Published
1991-08-01
OpenAlex
W4206956780
Cited by
1,117
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 28
FWCI
18.58
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Stanford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
coevolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review