Cited by 639Evolutionary Game Theory and CooperationLanguage and cultural evolutionEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 473 of the 473 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 390 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: a sketch of the evidence.

Open access

Abstract

Human cooperation is highly unusual. We live in large groups composed mostly of non-relatives. Evolutionists have proposed a number of explanations for this pattern, including cultural group selection and extensions of more general processes such as reciprocity, kin selection, and multi-level selection acting on genes. Evolutionary processes are consilient; they affect several different empirical domains, such as patterns of behavior and the proximal drivers of that behavior. In this target article, we sketch the evidence from five domains that bear on the explanatory adequacy of cultural group selection and competing hypotheses to explain human cooperation. Does cultural transmission constitute an inheritance system that can evolve in a Darwinian fashion? Are the norms that underpin institutions among the cultural traits so transmitted? Do we observe sufficient variation at the level of groups of considerable size for group selection to be a plausible process? Do human groups compete, and do success and failure in competition depend upon cultural variation? Do we observe adaptations for cooperation in humans that most plausibly arose by cultural group selection? If the answer to one of these questions is “no,” then we must look to other hypotheses. We present evidence, including quantitative evidence, that the answer to all of the questions is “yes” and argue that we must take the cultural group selection hypothesis seriously. If culturally transmitted systems of rules (institutions) that limit individual deviance organize cooperation in human societies, then it is not clear that any extant alternative to cultural group selection can be a complete explanation.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from a shortened version of the paper’s full text (it is longer than we read).

TL;DR

Richerson et al. argue that cultural group selection (CGS) is an essential and empirically plausible explanation for human cooperation among non-relatives, drawing on evidence from five domains. They conclude that culture acts as an inheritance system, group-level cultural variation is substantial, groups compete, and group-functional adaptations exist, though quantitative estimates of CGS strength remain incomplete.

Key findings

  • Culture acts as an inheritance system: developmental evidence shows imitation and teaching emerge in the first 12 months, and historical/linguistic data show phylogenetic descent with modification; in Tupi cultural domains, rates were usually less than five transitions in 10 millennia.
  • Cultural F_ST between neighboring groups is consistently greater than 0.01, with some traits above 0.6; for neighboring groups that might compete, cultural F_ST is approximately an order of magnitude larger than genetic F_ST.
  • Intergroup competition is documented: among the Turkana, 1% of male mortality is from within-Turkana violence versus 50% from inter-ethnic raids; average raids include 315 men, with some up to 1,000; large-scale warfare can involve mostly unrelated individuals (e.g., Stalingrad involved more than 1.7 million soldiers and over two million casualties).
  • Group-functional institutions and religion show effects: costly ritual displays correlate with commune longevity across more than 800 U.S. communes over 200 years; Soltis et al. estimated group extinction rates could spread a group-beneficial cultural trait to most of a metapopulation in 500–1,000 years.

Methods

  • The target article is a synthetic review or “sketch” of evidence from five domains: culture as an inheritance system, group-level cultural variation, intergroup competition, group-level functionality, and gene-culture coevolution.
  • Quantitative component: cultural F_ST was calculated from survey responses (World Values Survey, AfroBarometer, Public Policy Institute of California surveys, Scottish Health Survey, Anwar Sadat Chair Arab Public Opinion Surveys, among others) for neighboring political, religious, ethnic, geographic, and socioeconomic groups; the Price equation was used to express conditions for group selection.
  • Evidence is drawn from developmental psychology, historical linguistics and phylogenetics, ethnography, archaeology, economic organization, religion, and warfare.

Limitations

  • The paper states it cannot provide a precise quantitative account of CGS importance relative to competing processes; too few quantitative studies exist, and direct evidence for culture-led gene-culture coevolution is strong only for genes that do not directly affect behavior.
  • The paper notes uncertainty about how similar modern foragers are to Pleistocene foragers and that direct evidence for Pleistocene warfare is very limited.
  • The text makes evident that cultural F_ST from ethnographic data is often impossible because ethnographers typically report only normative behavior and neglect individual variation; the survey-based F_ST estimates also rely on group classifications that may not capture heritable cultural variation or cooperation-relevant traits.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0140525x1400106x

Cites

473 of 473 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 390 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Consistent with the hypothesis that individual variation for many normative beliefs and behaviors is small within groups and large between groups, we find large between-group differences among all groups of all scales.

    “Consistent with the hypothesis that individual variation for many normative beliefs and behaviors is small within groups and large between groups, we find large betweengroup differences among all groups of all scales (Fig. 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Our data reach well into the plateau of the L-shaped region of the group selection condition.

    “Our data reach well into the plateau of the L-shaped region of the group selection condition.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingcitation

    The extent of allomaternal care directed at immatures is the best predictor of experimentally assessed proactive prosociality within a group, far better than brain size, social tolerance, cooperative hunting, or strong social bonds.

    “The results (Fig. 1A) show that the extent of allomaternal care directed at immatures is the best predictor of experimentally assessed proactive prosociality within a group, far better in fact than any other factor proposed so far, including brain size, social tolerance, cooperative hunting, or the presence of strong social bonds.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Burkart et al. 2014
  • Findingcitation

    Tighter states perceive a greater degree of external threat than loose states.

    “perceive a greater degree of external threat, reflected in the desire for more national defense spending and greater rates of military recruitment, as compared to loose states.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Harrington and Gelfand (2014)
  • Findingown data

    Under low threat, evolutionary pressures result in a more diverse mix of all possible strategies.

    “Under low threat, the evolutionary pressures resulted in a more diverse mix of all possible strategies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 157
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 154
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Among small political or ethnic groups, nations, and religious majorities, we consistently report FST values greater than 0.01, with some traits showing FST scores above 0.6.

    “Among small political or ethnic groups, nations, and religious majorities, we consistently report F ST values greater than 0.01, with some traits showing F ST scores above 0.6.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingcitation

    Stronger N400 responses mediated cultural differences in attitudes and behaviors, including higher self-control and ethnocentrism, but lower creativity, among Chinese compared to U.S. groups.

    “Moreover, stronger N400 responses mediated cultural differences in a number of attitudes and behaviors, including higher self-control and ethnocentrism, but lower creativity, among Chinese as compared to U.S. groups.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mu et al. 2015
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Findingcitation

    Domesticated silver foxes developed humanly attractive faces with short snouts, floppy ears, patches of white fur, and curly tails.

    “These animals developed humanly attractive faces with short snouts, floppy ears, patches of white fur on their heads, and curly tails (Gibbons 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gibbons 2014
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Findingcitation

    Indigenous peoples of Amazonia commonly make pets of captured wild animals such as monkeys and birds.

    “Indigenous peoples of Amazonia, for example, commonly make pets of captured wild animals such as monkeys and birds.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Diamond 1993
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Findingcitation

    Social norms governing relationships with pets can shift dramatically over time.

    “Further, social norms governing relationships with pets can shift dramatically over time.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Findingnone given

    Pet-keeping is highly variable across cultures in both frequency and form.

    “Pet-keeping is highly variable across cultures in both frequency and form.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Findingcitation

    Pet-keeping is not a human universal.

    “unlike language, music, and prohibitions against sex with first-degree relatives, pet-keeping is not a human universal.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Findingcitation

    Pet-keeping is rare among tribal peoples of New Guinea.

    “This practice, however, is rare among tribal peoples of New Guinea (Diamond 1993).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Diamond 1993
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Findingcitation

    In Medieval Europe, cats were routinely subjected to torture and mass slaughter, as they were linked with witchcraft.

    “In Medieval Europe, cats were routinely subjected to torture and mass slaughter, as they were linked with witchcraft.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bradshaw 2013
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Findingnone given

    The frequency and form of pet-keeping vary widely among cultures.

    “Indeed, the frequency and form of pet-keeping vary widely among cultures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Findingcitation

    The complete transformation of the cat from pariah to household pet occurred by the end of the 18th century.

    “with the complete transformation of the cat from pariah to household pet occurring by the end of the 18th century (Bradshaw 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bradshaw 2013
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingcitation

    Preferences for pets are transmitted vertically from parent to child and horizontally across cultural landscapes.

    “Third, preferences for pets are transmitted vertically from parent to child and horizontally across cultural landscapes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingnone given

    In the United States over the last two decades, the proportion of homes with companion animals increased only slightly while spending on pets rose fivefold.

    “In the United States, over the last two decades, the proportion of homes with companion animals has increased only slightly while the amount of money Americans spend on their pets has risen fivefold.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Findingcitation

    Dogs substantially increase the success of Mayangna hunters in Nicaragua.

    “Dogs substantially increase the success of Mayangna hunters in Nicaragua”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Koster 2009
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Findingcitation

    The acquisition of horses by Apache and Comanche Indians in the 17th century profoundly changed the nature of tribal warfare on the Great Plains.

    “The acquisition of horses by Apache and Comanche Indians in the 17th century profoundly changed the nature of tribal warfare on the Great Plains of the United States (Hämäläinen 2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hämäläinen 2003
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingcitation

    In the aftermath of World War II, Japan ended state Shintoism and hundreds of religious groups sprang up in quick succession.

    “in the aftermath of World War II, Japan ended state Shintoism and hundreds of religious groups sprang up in a very quick succession; Iannaccone 1998.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Iannaccone 1998
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingcitation

    In relatively poor regions Europeans settled in large numbers and implemented institutions that encourage prosperity today.

    “in relatively poor regions Europeans settled in large numbers and implemented institutions that encourage prosperity today (Acemoglu et al. 2001;2002).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Acemoglu et al. 2001
    • cites Acemoglu et al. 2002
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Findingcitation

    Loci related to olfaction, immunity, and metabolism are among those most positively selected in recent human history.

    “Loci related to olfaction, immunity, and metabolism (connected to subsistence strategies) are among those most positively selected in recent human history (Akey 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Akey 2009
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingcitation

    The tendency to copy others' behaviour was highly variable and individuals were less likely to copy more cooperative strategies.

    “The tendency to copy others' behaviour was highly variable and individuals were less likely to copy more cooperative strategies, that is, behaviour that bore higher costs by depositing more money into a group pot.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lamba 2014
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingcitation

    Individuals are more selfish in larger populations and less likely to copy increasingly cooperative behaviour.

    “(3) individuals are more selfish in larger populations and less likely to copy increasingly cooperative behaviour (Lamba 2014;Lamba & Mace 2011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Lamba 2014
    • cites Lamba & Mace 2011
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingcitation

    No significant differences in cooperation were found between the two cultural groups when taking into account individual socio-economic characteristics, which best predicted variation in cooperative behaviour.

    “In addition, no significant differences in cooperation were found between the two cultural groups when taking into account individual socio-economic characteristics, which in turn best predicted the variation in cooperative behaviour (Silva & Mace 2014;2015).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Silva & Mace 2014;2015
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingcitation

    Individual and neighbourhood exposure to conflict explained a reduction in out-group cooperation, but had either no effect or also reduced cooperation toward the in-group.

    “Individual and neighbourhood exposure to conflict explained a reduction in out-group cooperation, but crucially had either no effect or also reduced cooperation toward the in-group.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Silva & Mace 2014;2015
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingnone given

    The Shakers had 6,000 members in the mid-19th century but the norm of celibacy shrank the group by outmigration and lack of reproduction, so only one small community remains.

    “The Shakers had 6,000 members in the mid-19th century but the norm of celibacy shrank the group by outmigration and lack of reproduction, so only one small community remains.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given

    CGS was and still is an important force in the evolution of human societies.

    “We outline here the evidence that supports the hypothesis that cultural group selection (CGS) was and still is an important force in the evolution of human societies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    As a result of these three features, we should also find evidence of group-level functionality in cultures, particularly in their social norms and institutions.

    “As a result of these three features, we should also find evidence of: (4) group-level functionality in cultures, particularly in their social norms and institutions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisenone given

    Human cooperation is highly unusual.

    “Human cooperation is highly unusual.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given

    Three distinct CGS processes exist, united by being driven by group-level heritable cultural variation, but differing in the mechanism of selection.

    “Three distinct CGS processes exist, united by being driven by group-level heritable cultural variation, but differing in the mechanism of selection.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Humans typically live in large, rule-bound, anonymous societies in which the mean genetic relatedness between members is low.

    “We typically live in large, rule-bound, anonymous societies in which the mean genetic relatedness between members is low (Moffett 2013).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Moffett 2013
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisenone given

    Humans live in large groups composed mostly of non-relatives.

    “We live in large groups composed mostly of non-relatives.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given

    If CGS is an active process in human social evolution, then we should see evidence that culture acts as an inheritance system; group-variable culturally transmitted social norms and institutions are among the domains of culture so transmitted; and success or failure in intergroup competition is frequently caused by institutional variation.

    “In sum, if CGS is an active process in human social evolution, then we should see evidence that: (1) culture acts as an inheritance system; (2) group-variable culturally transmitted social norms and institutions are among the domains of culture so transmitted; and (3) success or failure in intergroup competition is frequently caused by institutional variation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    If people tend to differentially copy locally common behaviors, the homogenizing effect of migration will be reduced and group differences will be maintained.

    “If people tend to differentially copy locally common behaviors, the homogenizing effect of migration will be reduced and group differences will be maintained (Boyd & Richerson 1985).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Boyd & Richerson 1985
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    The dramatic changes of modern environments are resulting in detectable selection on genes related to health and fertility.

    “The dramatic changes of modern environments are resulting in detectable selection on genes related to health and fertility (Byars et al. 2010;Kohler et al. 1999).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Byars et al. 2010
    • cites Kohler et al. 1999
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationreasoning

    If the three CGS processes have operated over spans of time consistent with the evolution of genes, then culture-led gene-culture coevolution may have favored genes that encourage group advantageous behavior.

    “If the three CGS processes described in the previous section have operated over spans of time consistent with the evolution of genes, then culture-led gene-culture coevolution may have favored genes that encourage group advantageous behavior.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Selection on modern groups will not have had a major impact on genes, but it has been very important in the ongoing evolution of complex societies.

    “Given their short history, selection on modern groups will not have had a major impact on genes, but we argue that it has been very important in the ongoing evolution of complex societies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation

    Cultural evolution will tend to be the leading process, and genetic evolution the lagging process, in gene-culture coevolution.

    “Cultural evolution will thus tend to be the leading process, and genetic evolution the lagging process, in gene-culture coevolution.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisereasoning

    Evidence currently exists that supports the hypothesis of culture-led gene-culture coevolution for a few simple genetic traits whose function is well known, but not yet for genes related to behavior.

    “Evidence currently exists that supports the hypothesis of culture-led gene-culture coevolution for a few simple genetic traits whose function is well known, but unfortunately not yet for genes related to behavior.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Recent molecular evidence suggests that genes associated with lactase persistence, malaria resistance, and other phenotypic changes swept to appreciable frequencies in the Holocene, as agricultural diets exerted selective pressures on digestive physiology and human populations became dense enough to carry epidemic diseases.

    “Recent molecular evidence suggests that the genes associated with these and other phenotypic changes swept to appreciable frequencies in the Holocene, as agricultural diets exerted selective pressures on digestive physiology (Itan et al. 2009;Tishkoff et al. 2007) and human populations became dense enough to carry epidemic diseases (Wolfe et al. 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Itan et al. 2009
    • cites Tishkoff et al. 2007
    • cites Wolfe et al. 2007
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Infants younger than one year prefer puppets that are helpful to others over those that are antisocial, suggesting that our social predispositions are partly innate.

    “Infants younger than one year prefer puppets that are helpful to others over those that are antisocial (Hamlin et al. 2011), suggesting that our social predispositions are partly innate.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hamlin et al. 2011
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A population of more docile individuals could permit the cultural evolution of slightly more sophisticated and effective norms, allowing groups to maintain more reliable cooperation and tools, which would be favored by CGS acting on this variation.

    “A population of more docile individuals could then permit the cultural evolution of slightly more sophisticated and effective norms.This would allow groups to maintain more reliable cooperation and tools, which would, in turn, be favored by CGS acting on this variation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisenone given

    So far, too few quantitative studies have been performed on CGS and competing processes to allow for much but qualitative judgments.

    “So far, too few quantitative studies have been performed on CGS and competing processes to allow for much but qualitative judgments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given

    Many cultural evolutionary processes generate cultural variation and cause evolution; CGS is only relevant to situations in which groups compete and is not a complete theory of the evolution of cultural variation.

    “Note that many cultural evolutionary processes generate cultural variation and cause evolution.CGS is only relevant to situations in which groups compete; it is not a complete theory of the evolution of cultural variation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisereasoning

    CGS is potentially acting on more than one of these groups simultaneously.

    “CGS is potentially acting on more than one of these groups simultaneously, leading many authors to speak of multi-level selection.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisereasoning

    Selective migration between groups can weaken unsuccessful groups and/or encourage leaders to adopt successful foreign norms, strengthening the two processes defined previously.

    “The resulting diminution of unsuccessful groups may weaken their competitive ability and/or encourage leaders to adopt successful foreign norms, strengthening the two processes defined previously.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Boyd & Richerson 2009
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    All three selective processes will tend to reduce group-level variation; thus, the standing group-level variation is a balance between variation-creating and variation-reducing forces.

    “All three selective processes will tend to reduce grouplevel variation.Thus, the standing group-level variation is a balance between variation-creating and variation-reducing forces.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    It is an empirical matter whether cultural evolutionary processes can maintain substantial between-group variation or whether appreciable group variation is hard to maintain.

    “It is an empirical matter whether cultural evolutionary processes can maintain substantial between-group variation or whether, as is the case with genetic variation, appreciable group variation is hard to maintain.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisenone given

    The evolution of complex societies in the last five millennia has generated a diverse array of social groups that can vary culturally, compete, and be subject to group selection.

    “The evolution of complex societies in the last five millennia has generated a diverse array of social groups that can vary culturally, compete, and be subject to group selection.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Language phylogenies appear to be a reasonable proxy for population movements, often matching phylogenetic patterns based on genes reasonably well, albeit not perfectly.

    “Language phylogenies appear to be a reasonable proxy for population movements, often matching phylogenetic patterns based on genes reasonably well (Cavalli-Sforza et al. 1988), albeit not perfectly.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cavalli-Sforza et al. 1988
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Recently, phylogenetic methods, originally borrowed from biology, have been applied to detecting descent-with-modification patterns in cultural data.

    “Recently, phylogenetic methods, originally borrowed from biology, have been applied to detecting descent-with-modification patterns in cultural data (Mace & Jordan 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mace & Jordan 2011
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Historical linguists established that languages evolved by descent with modification before Darwin and his contemporaries began to apply the idea to biological evolution.

    “Historical linguists established that languages evolved by descent with modification before Darwin and his contemporaries began to apply the idea to biological evolution (Müller 1862).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Müller 1862
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Currie and Mace (2009) found that the area over which a language is spoken is more closely related to its political complexity than to any other variable tested, consistent with the hypothesis that CGS on social organization features correlated with language played an important role in the creation of patterns of linguistic diversity.

    “Currie and Mace (2009) found that the area over which a language is spoken is more closely related to its political complexity than to any other variable tested, consistent with the hypothesis that CGS on social organization features correlated with language played an important role in the creation of patterns of linguistic diversity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Currie and Mace 2009
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given

    No evidence carefully examined to date suggests that non-evolutionary patterns dominate the archaeological and historical record, as would be suggested by strong versions of the evoked culture and improvisational intelligence hypotheses.

    “Certainly, no evidence carefully examined to date suggests that non-evolutionary patterns dominate the archaeological and historical record, as would be suggested by strong versions of the evoked culture and improvisational intelligence hypotheses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given

    Nonhuman social learners tested so far lack the skills necessary to acquire a large repertoire of complex skills, and there are so far no reports of nonhumans having acquired complex traits (traits composed of more than two or three separate innovations) by social learning.

    “Nonhuman social learners tested so far lack the skills necessary to acquire a large repertoire of complex skills, and there are so far no reports of nonhumans having acquired complex traits (traits composed of more than two or three separate innovations) by social learning.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisereasoning

    If CGS processes are to operate on cultural variation, then we must document appreciable variation at the level of groups.

    “If CGS processes are to operate on cultural variation, then we must document appreciable variation at the level of groups.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Individuals use a variety of strategies to acquire social information, tending to favor success-based strategies when such information is available; conformist strategies are typically employed when payoff-based information is unavailable or uninformative.

    “Individuals use a variety of strategies to acquire social information, tending to favor success-based strategies when such information is available to them; conformist strategies are typically employed when payoff-based information is unavailable or uninformative (Molleman et al. 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Molleman et al. 2014
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Guglielmino et al. (1995) detected a strong effect of vertical inheritance of cultural traits related to family and kinship and the economy, and a medium vertical effect on traits related to social stratification and house type.

    “They detected a strong effect of vertical inheritance of cultural traits related to family and kinship and the economy, and a medium vertical effect on traits related to social stratification and house type.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Guglielmino et al. (1995)
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given

    Children as young as 14 months will readily provide instrumental help to an adult, and children of 18 months will help and cooperate with unfamiliar adults.

    “For example, children as young as 14 months will readily provide instrumental help to an adult, and children of 18 months will help and cooperate with unfamiliar adults.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Social learning biases tend to preserve locally successful social behaviors and reduce the diffusion of cultural variation from one social group to another.

    “They tend to preserve locally successful social behaviors and reduce the diffusion of cultural variation from one social group to another (see sects.2.1 and 6.1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Children show adult levels of racial in-group bias by age 6, although language difference seems to be a more intuitively salient marker than differences in skin color.

    “Children show adult levels of racial in-group bias by age 6 (Dunham et al. 2008), although language difference seems to be a more intuitively salient marker than differences in skin color (Kinzler et al. 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Dunham et al. 2008
    • cites Kinzler et al. 2009
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Preschool children preferred to learn both linguistic and non-linguistic information from individuals who spoke with the same accent as themselves, and 12-month-olds preferentially copy the food selection choices of adult native speakers of their own language.

    “For example, preschool children preferred to learn both linguistic and non-linguistic information from individuals who spoke with the same accent as themselves (Kinzler et al. 2011), and 12-month-olds preferentially copy the food selection choices of adult native speakers of their own language (Shutts et al. 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kinzler et al. 2011
    • cites Shutts et al. 2009
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisenone given

    Identification with a group sometimes results in derogation of other groups.

    “Identification with a group sometimes results in derogation of other groups.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Attitudes toward out-groups are certainly not invariably invidious, contrary to some theories of ethnocentrism.

    “Attitudes toward out-groups are certainly not invariably invidious, however, contrary to some theories of ethnocentrism (Brewer 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Brewer 2007
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisenone given

    Norm transmission has not been extensively studied in adults or undergraduate volunteers.

    “Norm transmission has not been extensively studied in adults or undergraduate volunteers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given

    Ethnographers and historians tacitly assume that individual variation for normative behaviors is typically small within groups, is large between groups, and grows larger with time in most lineages.

    “Ethnographers and historians tacitly assume that individual variation for normative behaviors is typically small within groups, is large between groups, and grows larger with time in most lineages.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning

    Equation (1) says that traits will be favored if they have zero individual costs and positive group benefits.

    “Equation ( 1) says that traits will be favored if they have zero individual costs and positive group benefits.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationreasoning

    If the assumption that individual variation for normative behaviors is typically small within groups and large between groups is correct, the scope for CGS is large.

    “If this is correct, the scope for CGS is large.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisenone given

    Group selection on genes is generally implausible because migration between groups prevents substantial genetic variation from arising in groups larger than those composed of close kin.

    “Group selection on genes is generally implausible because migration between groups prevents substantial genetic variation from arising in groups larger than those composed of close kin.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    In some societies, participants sanctioned high contributors as well as low contributors, and in such societies, rates of cooperation in the games were low.

    “However, in some societies, participants sanctioned high contributors as well as low contributors.In such societies, rates of cooperation in the games were low.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Herrmann et al. (2008)
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given

    Institutions create and maintain variation between groups while simultaneously damping down variation among individuals within groups.

    “Institutions are important because they create and maintain variation between groups while simultaneously damping down variation among individuals within groups.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Symbolic markers serve to identify members of distinct social groups and subgroups and to define who is and who is not entitled to benefits from the activities of the organization.

    “Symbolic markers thus serve to identify members of distinct social groups and subgroups and to define who is and who is not entitled to benefits from the activities of the organization.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given

    Institutions are probably an ancient feature of human social life, ancient enough to have generated the coevolution of genes related to social behavior.

    “Institutions are probably an ancient feature of human social life, ancient enough to have generated the coevolution of genes related to social behavior.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    The Sukuma have a unique, elaborate institution of village governance, which the Pimbwe lack, and the Sukuma organize the provision of public goods much more effectively than the Pimbwe.

    “Interestingly, the Sukuma have a unique, elaborate institution of village governance, which the Pimbwe lack, and the Sukuma organize the provision of public goods much more effectively than the Pimbwe.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Paciotti et al. (2005)
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisereasoning

    As a system of commonly accepted norms, institutions are a property of a group and often vary qualitatively from group to group.

    “As a system of commonly accepted norms, they are a property of a group and often vary qualitatively from group to group.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Early experiments showed a strong conformity effect, and rather firm socialization pressure with normative content is observed in some experiments.

    “However, early experiments showed a strong conformity effect (Jacobs & Campbell 1961), and rather firm socialization pressure with normative content is observed in some experiments (Baum et al. 2004;2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Jacobs & Campbell 1961
    • cites Baum et al. 2004;2012
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    The Sukuma were found to have one of the highest average offers in the ultimatum game ever measured, while the Pimbwe made quite low offers.

    “The Sukuma, who are an expanding population of agro-pastoral colonizers, were found to have one of the highest average offers in the ultimatum game ever measured.The Pimbwe, in contrast, made quite low offers.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Paciotti et al. (2005)
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Institutional evolution occurs when ongoing changes destabilize an equilibrium previously regulated by an institution.

    “Greif's (2006) study of the evolution of early modern Mediterranean trading systems notes that institutional evolution occurs when ongoing changes destabilize an equilibrium previously regulated by an institution.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Greif's (2006)
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    If punishing is sufficiently cheap for punishers and sufficiently costly to the punished, punishment can stabilize any behavior.

    “If punishing is sufficiently cheap for punishers and sufficiently costly to the punished, punishment can stabilize any behavior (Boyd & Richerson 1992b).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Boyd & Richerson 1992b
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisenone given

    Institutions only function when large numbers of people conform to them.

    “Institutions only function when large numbers of people conform to them.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    In 32 present-day foraging societies, Hill et al. (2011) found evidence of frequent inter-band relations, low group genetic relatedness of co-residents within a band, and substantial interaction networks consisting of unrelated individuals, all structured by institutions that differ from society to society.

    “In 32 present-day foraging societies, Hill et al. (2011) found evidence of frequent inter-band relations, low group genetic relatedness of co-residents within a band, and substantial interaction networks consisting of unrelated individuals, all structured by institutions that differ from society to society.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hill et al. (2011)
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    The average Turkana raid includes 315 men, with some raids including up to a thousand.

    “The average raid includes 315 men, with some raids including up to a thousand.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mathew & Boyd 2011
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisereasoning

    A theoretically significant set of institutions are those that regulate family life and small-scale partnerships.

    “A theoretically significant set of institutions are those that regulate family life and small-scale partnerships.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisenone given

    Kinship institutions specify the responsibilities of family members toward each other.

    “Kinship institutions specify the responsibilities of family members toward each other.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisereasoning

    Mating according to such a contract confers social benefits of the cooperative breeding system on the couple, and mating outside it is often significantly sanctioned.

    “Mating according to such a contract confers social benefits of the cooperative breeding system on the couple, and mating outside it is often significantly sanctioned.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given

    Combatants experience the hazards of war, but the benefits of victory are widely shared, even by those who avoid the risks.

    “Combatants experience the hazards of war, but the benefits of victory are widely shared, even by those who avoid the risks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    As a consequence of warfare, the cultural traits of the successful groups often spread and the cultural traits of defeated groups and polities often decline.

    “As a consequence of warfare, the cultural traits of the successful groups often spread and the cultural traits of defeated groups and polities often decline.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    In the Turkana, 1% of mortality among Turkana men is from violence among Turkana, whereas 50% is from inter-ethnic raids.

    “For instance, in the Turkana, a tribe of about one million people living in northern Kenya, 1% of mortality among Turkana men is from violence among Turkana, whereas 50% is from inter-ethnic raids (Mathew & Boyd 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mathew & Boyd 2011
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given

    Losers of military competitions are sometimes killed outright and are sometimes voluntarily or involuntarily incorporated into the victorious society.

    “Losers of military competitions are sometimes killed outright and are sometimes voluntarily or involuntarily incorporated into the victorious society.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisereasoning

    The two conditions needed for warfare to cause CGS are (1) that variation in cultural traits between groups influences variation in success in warfare, and (2) that variation in success in warfare influences the spread of cultural traits.

    “The two conditions needed for warfare to cause CGS are (1) that variation in cultural traits between groups influences variation in success in warfare, and (2) that variation in success in warfare influences the spread of cultural traits.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisenone given

    The strategies used to formulate tribal institutions are widely applied to modern organizations such as churches, villages, neighborhoods, clubs, business organizations, and bureaucracies.

    “The strategies used to formulate tribal institutions are widely applied to modern organizations such as churches, villages, neighborhoods, clubs, business organizations, and bureaucracies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Most participants in Turkana raids are not close kin, and participants come from a wide swathe of Turkana society, including multiple sub-territories.

    “Most participants are not close kin, and participants come from a wide swathe of Turkana society, including multiple sub-territories.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mathew & Boyd 2011
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    The Turkana have cultural norms that discourage cowardice, norms that are enforced by peers who sanction violators in their local group.

    “Instead, the Turkana have cultural norms that discourage cowardice, norms that are enforced by peers who sanction violators in their local group.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mathew & Boyd 2011
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Class and regional variations are usually marked by linguistic differences.

    “For example, class and regional variations are usually marked by linguistic differences (Labov 2001).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Labov 2001
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Humans routinely engage in a broader set of small-scale cooperative activities than do our primate relatives, and institutionalized third-party rewards and punishments often regulate such activities.

    “Mathew et al. (2013) note that humans routinely engage in a broader set of small-scale cooperative activities than do our primate relatives, and they argue that institutionalized third-party rewards and punishments often regulate such activities.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mathew et al. (2013) source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    The direct evidence for warfare in the Pleistocene is very limited, and doubts about war's importance before the Holocene persist.

    “Nevertheless, the direct evidence for warfare in the Pleistocene is very limited, and doubts about war's importance before the Holocene persist (Guthrie 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Guthrie 2005
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given

    These institutional differences among groups in turn facilitate CGS via any of the three processes identified in section 2.1.

    “These institutional differences among groups in turn facilitate CGS via any of the three processes identified in section 2.1.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Cultural traits that affect military success are highly variable, and success in war tends to spread such traits by all three forms of CGS.

    “Cultural traits that affect military success are highly variable, and success in war tends to spread such traits by all three forms of CGS.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisenone given

    Economists routinely study all three mechanisms of CGS in competitive market systems.

    “Economists routinely study all three mechanisms of CGS in competitive market systems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Soltis et al. (1995) estimated group extinction rates from the differential group extinction and conversion of losers in a sample of societies in Papua New Guinea, and found that the estimated extinction rates would allow a group beneficial cultural trait to spread to most of a meta-population in 500-1,000 years.

    “Soltis et al. (1995) estimated group extinction rates from the differential group extinction and conversion of losers in a sample of societies in Papua New Guinea.They found that the estimated extinction rates would allow a group beneficial cultural trait to spread to most of a meta-population in 500-1,000 years.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Soltis et al. (1995)
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Cultural differences between firms tend to persist, and differential expansion and contraction of firms is very active despite attempts to acquire the practices of more successful firms.

    “Hence, cultural differences between firms tend to persist, and differential expansion and contraction of firms is very active despite attempts to acquire the practices of more successful firms.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given

    Absorption may be passive, in which defeated people adopt the identity of the dominant group through marriage and/or migration, or it can be coercive.

    “Absorption may be passive, in which defeated people adopt the identity of the dominant group through marriage and/or migration, or it can be coercive.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Soldiers from democratic nations seem to fight more effectively than soldiers from non-democratic nations, even after controlling for wealth and other measures of power, perhaps because they more consistently report that they find their government's war policies legitimate.

    “Soldiers from democratic nations also seem to fight more effectively than soldiers from non-democratic nations, even after controlling for wealth and other measures of power, perhaps because they more consistently report that they find their government's war policies legitimate (Reiter & Stam 2002).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Reiter & Stam 2002
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisereasoning

    Humans use language to formulate and transmit social norms and to operate institutional systems of reward and punishment that stabilize these norms.

    “Humans use language to formulate and transmit social norms and to operate institutional systems of reward and punishment that stabilize these norms.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given

    New employees acquire the firm's culture through formal and informal socialization and incorporate the firm's culture as part of their social identity.

    “New employees acquire the firm's culture through formal and informal socialization and incorporate the firm's culture as part of their social identity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Democratic leaders seem to be better at picking the wars they fight, and they are more politically accountable when wars are lost.

    “Democratic leaders seem to be better at picking the wars they fight, and they are more politically accountable when wars are lost.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Reiter & Stam 2002
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Well-run firms profit and survive, while poorly run firms with losses expire.

    “Well-run firms profit and survive, while poorly run firms with losses expire.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Economic CGS has a long history and is very important in modern societies.

    “Economic CGS has a long history (Curtin 1984) and is very important in modern societies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Curtin 1984
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Sovereign territorial states out-competed both empires and feudal societies because they were better able to raise capital for military campaigns.

    “Tilly (1992) argues that sovereign territorial states out-competed both empires and feudal societies because they were better able to raise capital for military campaigns.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tilly (1992)
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    In animal communication systems, very little information is transmitted and syntactic complexity is quite limited.

    “In such systems, very little information is transmitted and syntactic complexity is quite limited (Hurford 2007).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hurford 2007
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Merlin Donald hypothesizes that Homo erectus and related Lower and Middle Pleistocene hominins were talented mimics, and that mimesis served as the evolutionary basis on which language could subsequently evolve.

    “Merlin Donald (1991) hypothesizes that Homo erectus and related Lower and Middle Pleistocene hominins were talented mimics, and that mimesis served as the evolutionary basis on which language could subsequently evolve.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Merlin Donald (1991)
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisereasoning

    Linguistic variation is extremely important in maintaining social structure and influencing social judgments.

    “Linguistic variation is extremely important in maintaining social structure and influencing social judgments, as we saw in the case of children's early learning biases (sect.4.2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    19th-century deaf-mutes also acquired basic social norms and integrated themselves into complex institutions.

    “They also acquired basic social norms and integrated themselves into complex institutions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Donald
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationcitation

    Having tight constraints on languages ought to make them easier and quicker to learn both for children and for people wanting to be able to speak multiple languages.

    “Following the arguments for the efficiency of having innate, information-rich cognitive modules (Tooby & Cosmides 1992), having tight constraints on languages ought to make them easier and quicker to learn both for children and for people wanting to be able to speak multiple languages.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tooby & Cosmides 1992 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given

    Such rituals today have powerful group-bonding effects and are therefore commonly incorporated into religious and secular patriotic celebrations.

    “Such rituals today have powerful group-bonding effects and are therefore commonly incorporated into religious and secular patriotic celebrations (see sect.6.3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Culture was already tolerably complex before the capacity for language began to evolve.

    “A plausible answer is that culture was already tolerably complex before the capacity for language began to evolve.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Stone tool manufacture may go back three million years, and edge-wear evidence suggests that early stone tools were used to make a toolkit of perishable materials such as wood and hides.
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The evolution of symbolic boundaries to communication will help protect group-level cultural variation from the homogenizing effects of migration, and thus favor the operation of CGS.

    “The evolution of symbolic boundaries to communication will help protect group-level cultural variation from the homogenizing effects of migration, and thus favor the operation of CGS.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisenone given

    Theories of language evolution differ mainly in the extent to which genes have responded to the coevolutionary pressure with language-specific cognitive structures.

    “Theories differ mainly in the extent to which genes have responded to the coevolutionary pressure with language-specific cognitive structures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Language differences, like other symbolic differences, might evolve to limit communication between groups.

    “It might be that language differences, like other symbolic differences, evolve to limit communication between groups (see sect.2.1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisenone given

    All the recent evolutionary theories of the capacity for language, beginning with Pinker and Bloom's (1990) pioneering article, are culture-led gene-culture coevolutionary hypotheses.

    “All the recent evolutionary theories of the capacity for language, beginning with Pinker and Bloom's (1990) pioneering article, are culture-led gene-culture coevolutionary hypotheses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pinker and Bloom's (1990)
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationreasoning

    CGS favors not being able to understand those whom you likely cannot trust.

    “It is as if CGS favors not being able to understand those whom you likely cannot trust.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Language variation helps maintain between-group variation in other cultural domains, contributing to CGS, but it is also likely to be a product of it.

    “Language variation helps maintain between-group variation in other cultural domains, contributing to CGS, but it is also likely to be a product of it.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    There is much individual variation both in propensities to cooperate and to punish non-cooperators.

    “They find much individual variation both in propensities to cooperate and to punish non-cooperators (Henrich et al. 2010a;Kurzban & Houser 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Henrich et al. 2010a
    • cites Kurzban & Houser 2005
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisenone given

    Even at the scale of businesses and similar groups whose members speak the same language, group-specific jargon often distinguishes insiders from outsiders.

    “Even at the scale of businesses and similar groups whose members speak the same language, group-specific jargon often distinguishes insiders from outsiders.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Religions furnish group-boundary-defining symbols, moral justifications for institutions of social control, and rituals that celebrate and facilitate an organization's solidarity.

    “Religions furnish group-boundary-defining symbols, moral justifications for institutions of social control, and rituals that celebrate and facilitate an organization's solidarity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Elite groups in agrarian societies provide services but have a tendency to grow and become increasingly corrupt over time.

    “Elite groups do provide services in such societies, but they have a tendency to grow and become increasingly corrupt over time.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Turchin and Nefedov (2009)
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Evolution has built an element of genuine empathy and true altruism into our social psychology because monitoring and punishment are costly to punishers and to punishees, but many people obey norms mainly because deviance is punished.

    “We are inclined to think that evolution has built an element of genuine empathy and true altruism into our social psychology because monitoring and punishment are costly to punishers and to punishees, but many people obey norms mainly because deviance is punished.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisenone given

    Institutions include mechanisms of selective punishment and reward that reduce small-scale variation in behavior.

    “Institutions include mechanisms of selective punishment and reward that reduce small-scale variation in behavior.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    The ritual of close-order drill reshaped warfare by facilitating in-group cooperation and camaraderie, leading to the higher success of groups that perform these seemingly functionally meaningless rituals.

    “McNeill (1995) gives evidence that the ritual of close-order drill reshaped warfare by facilitating in-group cooperation and camaraderie, leading to the higher success of groups that perform these seemingly functionally meaningless rituals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites McNeill (1995)
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisereasoning

    Human organizations compete, often in highly organized ways, and the success and failure of groups in such competitions is often determined by institutional and other cultural differences.

    “Human organizations compete, often in highly organized ways, and the success and failure of groups in such competitions is often determined by institutional and other cultural differences.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given

    Young children learn norms and act on them, but chimpanzee societies have, at best, rudimentary norms.

    “This is reflected by the observation that young children learn norms and act on them, but chimpanzee societies have, at best, rudimentary norms.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Synchronized dance and rhythmic ritual facilitate coordination and bonding of groups, and relieve low-level in-group conflict.

    “Ethnographic, historical, and experimental evidence suggest that synchronized dance and rhythmic ritual facilitate coordination and bonding of groups, and relieve low-level in-group conflict (Kirschner & Tomasello 2010;McNeill 1995;Rappaport 1999).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Kirschner & Tomasello 2010
    • cites McNeill 1995
    • cites Rappaport 1999
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Costly signals of group membership, such as hard-to-perform rituals and other sacrifices, help groups weed out free-riders and foster in-group altruism.

    “Theoretical arguments (Iannaccone 1992), supported by quantitative observations (Sosis & Bressler 2003;Sosis & Ruffle 2003), suggest that costly signals of group membership, such as hard-to-perform rituals and other sacrifices, help groups weed out free-riders and foster ingroup altruism.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Iannaccone 1992
    • cites Sosis & Bressler 2003
    • cites Sosis & Ruffle 2003
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given

    The current direct evidence for culture-led gene-culture coevolution is only strong for genes that do not directly affect behavior, but evidence regarding behavioral traits is likely to improve greatly in the next decade.

    “The current direct evidence for culture-led gene-culture coevolution is only strong for genes that do not directly affect behavior, but evidence regarding behavioral traits is likely to improve greatly in the next decade.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given

    Individual-level human decisions regarding the invention of new cultural variants, the spread of variants by diffusion, and the choices of group affiliation are likely to be strongly colored by moral intuitions like sympathy and patriotism.

    “Individual-level human decisions regarding the invention of new cultural variants, the spread of variants by diffusion, and the choices of group affiliation are likely to be strongly colored by moral intuitions like sympathy and patriotism.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given

    These groups are often symbolically marked, have more or less formal criteria for membership, and possess distinctive social institutions.

    “These groups are often symbolically marked, have more or less formal criteria for membership, and possess distinctive social institutions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Religions (and other ideologies), when used to create in-group solidarity, sometimes create fear and hatred of out-groups.

    “At the same time, of course, religions (and other ideologies), when used to create in-group solidarity, sometimes create fear and hatred of out-groups (West 1941).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites West 1941
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    A common characteristic of religions is sacred rules.

    “A common characteristic of religions is sacred rules (Durkheim 1912;Rappaport 1999).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Durkheim 1912
    • cites Rappaport 1999
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisereasoning

    Sacred rules often manifest as prosocial rules, including norms of fairness and norms of group defense, and also as symbolic systems that demarcate in-group membership.

    “These often manifest as prosocial rules, including norms of fairness and norms of group defense, and also as symbolic systems that demarcate in-group membership.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Non-religious institutions also carry out rituals as part of their group culture, and they have similar effects.

    “Non-religious institutions also carry out rituals as part of their group culture, and they have similar effects.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Humans perfectly fit the nonhuman primate regression for proactive prosociality, suggesting that we do not need a special explanation for our proactive prosociality.

    “Most importantly, humans perfectly fit the nonhuman primate regression, suggesting that we do not need a special explanation for our proactive prosociality.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Participants experiencing a social environment that favors defection are dramatically less prosocial in subsequent one-shot anonymous interactions, but only if they rely on intuitive, heuristic processing.

    “Participants experiencing a social environment that favors defection are dramatically less prosocial in subsequent one-shot anonymous interactions, but only if they rely on intuitive, heuristic processing”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Peysakhovich & Rand 2015
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The SHH accomplishes this without an appeal to group selection or intergroup conflict.

    “Importantly, the SHH accomplishes this without an appeal to group selection or intergroup conflict.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Evolutionary biologists have struggled fairly successfully with similar complexities in organic evolution.

    “The good news is that evolutionary biologists have struggled fairly successfully with similar complexities in organic evolution (Endler 1986).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Endler 1986
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given

    We do not see how any of the alternatives to CGS can easily account for the institutionalized cooperation that characterizes human societies.

    “We do not see how any of the alternatives to CGS can easily account for the institutionalized cooperation that characterizes human societies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The adoption of cooperative breeding suffices to explain the origin of human hyper-cooperation in early forager societies, as it resulted in increased prosociality and social transmission and favored the emergence of language.

    “However, we will argue that the adoption of cooperative breeding suffices to explain the origin of human hyper-cooperation in early forager societies, as it resulted in increased prosociality and social transmission and favored the emergence of language.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Psychological and cognitive consequences of cooperative breeding in nonhuman primates also arose when our hominin ancestors, but none of the other great apes, started to engage in cooperative breeding.
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation

    Cultural evolution and learning need not be linked to group-level selection, and genetic evolution to individual-level selection.

    “Thus, cultural evolution and learning need not be linked to grouplevel selection, and genetic evolution to individual-level selection, as is done in the target article”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Total fitness of a population can be carved up in multiple ways and attributed to any number of traits, so long as fitness and trait values covary.

    “The total fitness of a population can be carved up in multiple ways and attributed to any number of traits, so long as fitness and trait values covary.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Price 1972
    • cites Hamilton 1975
    • cites Queller 1992
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Richerson et al. have not shown that CGS is 'essential' to human cooperation, or even that it has operated on any single trait.

    “However, they have not shown that it is “essential” to human cooperation, or even that it has operated on any single trait.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Improving the group's welfare occurs as a side effect of selection maximizing individual payoffs, rather than as the cause of that selection.

    “Thus, improving the group's welfare occurs as a side effect of selection maximizing individual payoffs, rather than as the cause of that selection.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    A proper quantitative investigation of cultural evolution and gene-culture coevolution is possible.

    “We have pointed to excellent pioneering studies showing that a proper quantitative investigation of cultural evolution and gene-culture coevolution is possible (e.g., Bouckaert et al. 2012;Hout et al. 2001;Itan et al. 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bouckaert et al. 2012
    • cites Hout et al. 2001
    • cites Itan et al. 2009
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Although individual-level and multi-level fitness partitions are predictively equivalent, they are not causally so.

    “Although individual-level and multi-level fitness partitions are predictively equivalent, they are not causally so”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Birch & Okasha 2015
    • cites Okasha 2015
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Kin selection and reciprocity can explain where our cooperative motivations came from and how they were exposed to selection, though they are not sufficient to explain large-scale cooperation.

    “Like Richerson et al., we do not think that kin selection and reciprocity are sufficient to explain large-scale cooperation, but again, think they can explain where our cooperative motivations came from and how they were exposed to selection”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The tribal social instincts and CGS were important very early in human evolution as our infant ancestors evolved enhanced social-cognitive skills (theory of mind) that enabled them to bargain and negotiate through parent-offspring conflict.

    “In conclusion, we believe that the tribal social instincts and CGS were important very early in human evolution as our infant ancestors evolved the enhanced social-cognitive skills (theory of mind) that enabled them to “bargain and negotiate” their way through parent-offspring conflict.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Selection operates only on phenotypes, and phenotypes must develop before they are exposed to selection.
    • Rests on an assumption: Everyone's first group, tribe, society, institution, ethnolinguistic unit, and culture is the mother-infant group.
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Regardless of whether CGS is needed to explain the Holocene transition to large-scale societies, cooperative breeding is necessary to explain its operation in the first place.

    “Thus, regardless of whether CGS is needed to explain the Holocene transition to large-scale societies, cooperative breeding is necessary to explain its operation in the first place.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Psychological and cognitive consequences of cooperative breeding in nonhuman primates also arose when our hominin ancestors, but none of the other great apes, started to engage in cooperative breeding.
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation

    Extensive allomaternal care is a better explanation than male bonding and cooperative hunting/indirect reciprocity for human cooperation, because in other male-bonded or cooperatively hunting species, similar prosocial tendencies are not seen unless they also are cooperative breeders.

    “Extensive allomaternal care is a better explanation than the other source of human cooperation, male bonding and the resulting cooperative hunting and indirect reciprocity in food sharing, because in other male-bonded or cooperatively hunting species, we do not see similar prosocial tendencies, unless they also are cooperative breeders”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Burkart et al. 2009
    • cites Burkart & van Schaik 2010
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The earliest cultural norms evolved through mother-infant cooperation.

    “We think the earliest cultural norms evolved through mother-infant cooperation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Everyone's first group, tribe, society, institution, ethnolinguistic unit, and culture is the mother-infant group.
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Group prosperity rests on in-group love (rather than out-group hate) that emerges also absent intergroup competition or comparison.

    “Moreover, group prosperity rests on in-group love (rather than out-group hate) that emerges also absent intergroup competition or comparison.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Because intergroup interactions often are mixed-motive rather than strictly zero-sum, groups often negotiate settlements that enable both cultures to thrive.

    “Because intergroup interactions often are mixed-motive rather than strictly zero-sum, groups often negotiate settlements that enable both cultures to thrive.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Intergroup competition strengthens in-group love rather than out-group hate, both among adults and young children.

    “Indeed, intergroup competition strengthens in-group love rather than out-group hate (Halevy et al. 2008;2012), both among adults (De Dreu et al. 2014;Halevy et al. 2008) and young children”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Halevy et al. 2008
    • cites De Dreu et al. 2014
    • cites Buttelmann & Böhm 2014
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation

    The evolution of human cooperation made the tribal social instincts and CGS possible in the first place, and this occurred much earlier than Richerson et al. think.

    “While they make a solid case for the role of cultural group selection (CGS) in human evolution and history, we think it is the evolution of human cooperation that made the tribal social instincts and CGS possible in the first place, and that this occurred much earlier than the authors think.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Intergroup interactions often involve some corresponding interests and can be settled peacefully through negotiated deals that allow both sides, and their respective cultures, to survive and prosper.

    “Thus, intergroup interactions often involve some corresponding interests and can and are settled peacefully through negotiated deals that allow both sides, and their respective cultures, to survive and prosper.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A more parsimonious and empirically more valid perspective may be that CGS is the outcome of individuals and their groups seeking to survive and prosper, and who create norms and cultural practices that sustain and promote biologically prepared tendencies for in-group love.

    “Accordingly, a more parsimonious and empirically more valid perspective may be that cultural group selection is the outcome of individuals and their groups seeking to survive and prosper, and who, therefore, create norms and cultural practices that sustain and promote biologically prepared tendencies for in-group love.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation

    Pronounced neural reactions to norm violations should enable groups to enforce social norms and punish deviant behavior, enhancing intragroup cohesion and intergroup variation.

    “More generally, pronounced neural reactions to norm violations should enable groups to enforce social norms and punish deviant behavior, which, according Richerson et al., should further enhance intragroup cohesion and intergroup variation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given

    The article misapplies the Fst statistic.

    “The article also misapplies the F st statistic.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Higher frequencies of the short (S) allele in the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism persist in regions prone to ecological threat because heightened threat sensitivity may be adaptive there.

    “Mrazek et al. (2013) argue that higher frequencies of short (S) allele in the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism of the serotonin transporter gene (SLC6A4) persist in regions of the world prone to ecological threat because heightened threat sensitivity may be adaptive in such regions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mrazek et al. (2013)
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given

    The current proposal lacks connection to relevant evidence from the human evolutionary record and requires better integration with contemporary evolutionary theory.

    “However, the current proposal lacks connection to relevant evidence from the human evolutionary record and requires a better integration with contemporary evolutionary theory.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Key aspects of CGS emerged previous to identifiable symbol-making and then coevolved, via niche construction and selection (alongside drift and gene flow), with that capacity to develop a baseline for the radical leaps in complexity in the last 20,000 years.

    “We suggest that key aspects of CGS emerged previous to identifiable symbol-making and then coevolved, via niche construction and selection (alongside drift and gene flow), with that capacity to develop a baseline for the radical leaps in complexity in the last 20,000 years that Richerson et al. focus on.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Survey answers are influenced by multiple contextual and contingent cultural variables and cannot be treated as independent material measures analogous to alleles or cranial measurements.

    “They are influenced by multiple contextual and contingent (and linguistic) cultural variables and cannot be treated as independent material measures analogous to the number of alleles at a locus or inter-parietal breadth on a cranium.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation

    In-group love can emerge both in the presence and absence of intergroup competition, and intergroup competition motivates in-group love more than out-group hate.

    “Thus, in-group love can emerge both in the presence and absence of intergroup competition, and intergroup competition motivates in-group love more than out-group hate.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Cultural evolution can spread social norms for treating distant cousins more like genetic siblings, fostering cooperation while inhibiting sex and marriage.

    “By building on the intuitions and motivations supplied by our evolved kin psychology, cultural evolution can, for example, spread social norms for treating distant cousins more like genetic siblings, thereby fostering greater cooperation while inhibiting sex and marriage.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationcitation

    Threat-driven genetic variance in the S allele may underlie differences in moral attitudes across cultures.

    “they suggest that threat-driven genetic variance in the S allele may underlie differences in moral attitudes across cultures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mrazek et al. (2013)
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Cultural group selection is a framework within which explanations of human cooperation can be developed.

    “Rather, it is a framework within which such an explanation can fruitfully be developed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisenone given

    The position of the hyoid bone in Homo sapiens permits highly precise and flexible tongue movements.

    “The position of the hyoid bone, which is a point of attachment for a tongue muscle, developed in Homo sapiens in a manner permitting highly precise and flexible tongue movements.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Modern humans have a larynx low in the throat, allowing the throat to serve as a resonating chamber capable of a great number of sounds.

    “Modern humans have a larynx low in the throat, a position that allows the throat to serve as a resonating chamber capable of a great number of sounds (Relethford 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Relethford 2007
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Nerves and muscles to the mouth, larynx, and tongue became more numerous to handle the complexities of speech.

    “Concurrently, nerves and muscles to the mouth, larynx, and tongue became more numerous to handle the complexities of speech (Jurmain et al. 1997).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jurmain et al. 1997
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given

    Cultural group selection is not an explanation of anything.

    “Cultural group selection is not an explanation of anything.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given

    Consonant production requires a short oral cavity, whereas our nearest primate relatives have much too long an oral cavity for this purpose.

    “In addition, the production of consonants requires a short oral cavity, whereas our nearest primate relatives have much too long an oral cavity for this purpose.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    The lack of need for brachiation freed the hand, arms, and shoulders of proto-humans to evolve for other purposes.

    “The lack of need for brachiation freed the hand, arms, and shoulders of proto-humans to evolve for other purposes (Gintis et al. 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gintis et al. 2015
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisenone given

    Few scholars have explored CGS as a phenomenon modified by the ecological and historical contexts in which human groups are embedded.

    “few have explored it as a phenomenon that is modified by the ecological and historical contexts in which human groups are embedded.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given

    There is overwhelming evidence for culture-led gene-culture coevolution as central to the constitution of Homo sapiens.

    “In fact, there is overwhelming evidence for this process as central to the constitution of Homo sapiens”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisenone given

    Humans are unique in possessing a torso musculature optimized for the powerful and accurate throwing of projectile weapons.

    “Humans are unique in possessing a torso musculature optimized for the powerful and accurate throwing of projectile weapons.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisenone given

    The first hominids with skeletal structures supporting this laryngeal placement were Homo heidelbergensis, who lived from 800,000 to 100,000 years ago.

    “The first hominids that had skeletal structures supporting this laryngeal placement were the Homo heidelbergensis, who lived from 800,000 to 100,000 years ago.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Regions in the motor cortex expanded in early humans to facilitate speech production.

    “Regions in the motor cortex expanded in early humans to facilitate speech production.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jurmain et al. 1997
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given

    The more powerful evolved mechanisms are, the more effectively culture can harness them to generate greater phenotypic variation across groups, fueling CGS.

    “The more powerful such evolved mechanisms are, the more effectively culture can potentially harness and manipulate them to generate greater phenotypic variation across groups, thereby fueling cultural group selection.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Life history switches account for between-group variation in prosociality and the growth of moralizing religions.

    “some argue, often in opposition to cultural evolutionary accounts, that such life history switches account for between-group variation in prosociality and the growth of moralizing religions (Baumard et al. 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Baumard et al. 2015
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation

    Intergroup competition can favor social norms that maximize the effectiveness of direct reciprocity, helping explain variation in its importance among societies.

    “Intergroup competition can favor those social norms which maximize the effectiveness of direct reciprocity under particular conditions, and this may help explain why the importance of direct reciprocity varies so dramatically among societies (Fiske 1992).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fiske 1992
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    The spread of normative monogamous marriage harnesses evolved mechanisms to increase paternal investment, household relatedness, and infant/child survival while reducing male-male competition.

    “The spread of normative monogamous marriage provides an example of an institution that harnesses various evolved mechanisms to increase paternal investment, household relatedness, and infant/child survival while reducing male-male competition (Henrich et al. 2012b).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Henrich et al. 2012b
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationnone given

    Environmental cues may evoke evolved psychological responses that influence human sociality.

    “Finally, environmental cues may evoke evolved psychological responses that influence human sociality.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation

    These factors became barriers to further development and prevented efficient cooperation.

    “These factors eventually became barriers to their further development and prevented efficient cooperation”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Olsson & Paik 2013
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Culture adoption elasticity is highly dependent on geographical, historical, and intragroup factors and on development of competing cultures, but the direction of influence is not straightforward.

    “Culture adoption elasticity is highly dependent on the geographical, historical, and intragroup factors and on development of competing cultures, but the direction of influence is not straightforward (Acemoglu et al. 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Acemoglu et al. 2005
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationcitation

    Genetic diversity has greater effects on comparative development than Richerson et al. admit.

    “Genetic diversity has greater effects on comparative development than Richerson et al. admit.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Antimonopoly law is often a tool of adjustment of government politics or a product of lobby groups' pressure.

    “antimonopoly law is often a tool of adjustment of government politics (Armentano 1986) or a product of lobby groups' pressure.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Armentano 1986
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationcitation

    Competitive forces shape aspects of human-animal interactions that are precursors to affection.

    “competitive forces do shape aspects of human-animal interactions that are precursors to affection.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation

    Genetic make-up can influence aspects of cultural evolution, which along with resource accessibility may give advantage to bearers of certain genetic markers.

    “Genetic make-up can influence aspects of cultural evolution, which along with resource accessibility may in turn give advantage to bearers of certain genetic markers in a gene-culture coevolutionary process”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Havlícěk & Roberts 2013
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Thriving Neolithic agricultural societies formed large and successful autocratic cultures, but high power inequality and rent-seeking emerged.

    “An example of our point consists in thriving Neolithic agricultural societies, which formed large and successful autocratic cultures, but in which high power inequality and rent-seeking emerged.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Olsson & Paik 2013
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Religion often has characteristics of a trait designed for group promotion and cohesion, making it a strong candidate for spread through intergroup competition.

    “Religion often has the characteristics of a trait designed for group promotion and cohesion (e.g., costly rituals, apostasy punishment, and clear between-group demarcation) making it a strong candidate for spread through intergroup competition.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    Individuals from different villages did not share a common cultural norm of cooperation despite their common ethnicity, and their behaviour varied in response to demographic and ecological features of their environment.

    “Hence, individuals from different villages did not share a common cultural norm of cooperation despite their common ethnicity, and their behaviour varied in response to the demographic and ecological features of their environment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    The adaptationist approach of George Williams revolutionized evolutionary biology.

    “The adaptationist approach of George Williams (1966) revolutionized evolutionary biology.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Williams (1966)
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Cognitive niche hypotheses propose mechanisms that extract information from the environment and make appropriate inferences.

    “Cognitive niche hypotheses propose mechanisms that extract information from the environment and make appropriate inferences (Tooby & DeVore 1987).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tooby & DeVore 1987
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    Empirical data suggest that cultural transmission is less likely as behaviour gets more cooperative and cooperation is less likely in large populations.

    “While CGS models invoke cultural transmission to explain the evolution of large-scale cooperation, empirical data suggest that cultural transmission is less likely as behaviour gets more cooperative and cooperation is less likely in large populations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    If individuals do not copy cooperative behaviour, behavioural variation between groups is unstable due to demographic changes, and behaviour is more selfish in larger populations, then we must question the existence of stably transmitted cultural norms of cooperation.

    “In conclusion, if individuals do not copy cooperative behaviour, the behavioural variation between groups is unstable due to the demographic changes that groups experience over time, and behaviour is more selfish in larger populations, then we must question the existence of stably transmitted cultural norms of cooperation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Not all traits are adaptations; some are merely incidental by-products of adaptations and need no special adaptive explanation.

    “Not all traits are adaptations: some are merely incidental by-products of adaptations and need no special adaptive explanation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    The red color of oxygenated blood is a by-product of its chemistry and needs no adaptive explanation.

    “Its red color when oxygenated is a by-product of its chemistry and needs no adaptive explanation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisecitation

    Selection is most efficient at the lowest, most faithfully replicating levels in the hierarchy of life.

    “Williams had a further insight: Selection is most efficient at the lowest, most faithfully replicating levels in the hierarchy of life.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Evoked culture hypotheses propose facultative cognitive mechanisms that modulate behavior based on available information.

    “Evoked culture hypotheses propose facultative cognitive mechanisms that modulate behavior based on available information (Tooby & Cosmides 1992).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tooby & Cosmides 1992 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation

    High levels of variation in cooperative behaviour are also found within ethnic groups, suggesting that variation attributed to different cultural norms could reflect individual adaptations to different environments.

    “However, as we and others have argued elsewhere, high levels of variation in cooperative behaviour are also found within ethnic groups (Lamba & Mace 2011;2012;Nettle et al. 2011), suggesting that variation attributed to different cultural norms could in fact reflect individual adaptations to different environments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Lamba & Mace 2011;2012
    • cites Nettle et al. 2011
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation

    Political systems have to be properties of the group rather than the individual, so group selection should be in operation in these cases.

    “Political systems have to be properties of the group rather than the individual, so group selection should be in operation in these cases (Currie & Mace 2009;Currie et al 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Currie & Mace 2009
    • cites Currie et al 2010
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given

    Genes reproduce more faithfully than individuals, who reproduce more faithfully than groups.

    “Genes reproduce more faithfully than individuals, who reproduce more faithfully than groups.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisereasoning

    Adaptations generally arise in the service of transmitting the genes that build them, not in the service of perpetuating the groups where individuals carrying those genes reside.

    “Thus, adaptions generally arise in the service of transmitting the genes that build them, not in the service of perpetuating the groups where individuals carrying those genes reside.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Theories of cultural group selection, gene-culture coevolution, and dual inheritance are now at least 30 years old.

    “Theories of cultural group selection, gene-culture coevolution, and dual inheritance are now at least 30 years old (e.g., Boyd & Richerson 1985).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Boyd & Richerson 1985
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation

    Features of evoked culture can act as further inputs to other facultative mechanisms and evoke further novel cultural features.

    “To the extent that our evolved social psychology is richly articulated, features of this evoked culture can act as further inputs to other facultative mechanisms and evoke further novel cultural features (Tooby & Cosmides 1992).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tooby & Cosmides 1992 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Our evolved psychology of personal aggression can be exploited by institutions to evoke cultures that never existed before.

    “Although police forces and the rule of law did not exist in Paleolithic society, our evolved psychology of personal aggression can be exploited by these institutions to evoke cultures that never existed before.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Group selection should only be invoked with clear evidence of group-level adaptation, not merely group-level phenomena.

    “Group selection should only be invoked with clear evidence of group-level adaptation, not merely group-level phenomena, an error repeatedly made by the target article.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    No evidence is offered that language, punishment, and religion arise from cultural group selection.

    “More critically, no evidence is offered that these traits arise from cultural group selection; we argue that apparent group-level effects are by-products arising from individual-level benefits when this alternative is taken seriously.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation

    The utility of using coercive power to get one's way would have ancestrally varied between people and between ecologies.

    “This was surely the case for punishment, as the utility of using coercive power to get one's way would have ancestrally varied between people (e.g., aggression pays more for the strong; Sell et al. 2009) and between ecologies (e.g., aggression pays more when there are gains it can recruit; Krasnow et al. 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Sell et al. 2009
    • cites Krasnow et al. 2012
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Blood contains adaptations for the transport of oxygen and carbon dioxide; its transport properties were crafted by natural selection.

    “Blood contains adaptations for the transport of oxygen and carbon dioxide; its transport properties were crafted by natural selection.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Williams (1966)
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Migration and imitation are more likely to work toward equilibrium selection.

    “Migration and imitation are more likely to work toward equilibrium selection: We can expect people to join the societies, or adopt the institutions, that give them a better deal.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Types 2 and 3 of CGS must, at least occasionally, create group-level selection pressures that are fully aligned with individual-level selection pressures, and thus undistinguishable from them.

    “Types 2 and 3 of CGS must, at least occasionally, create group-level selection pressures that are fully aligned with individual-level selection pressures, and thus undistinguishable from them (unless we assume that human decision-making is so maladaptive as to decreases individual fitness systematically).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Type 2 CGS is migration, when individuals vote with their feet to join societies that offer them the best deal.

    “Type 2 CGS is migration, when individuals vote with their feet to join the societies that offer them the best deal (Boyd & Richerson 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Boyd & Richerson 2009
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Cultural norms vary, change, and influence cooperation; but that is not group selection.

    “Cultural norms vary, change, and influence cooperation; but that is not group selection.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    In Type 3 CGS (selective imitation), preferential cooperation must also be dropped; group members are defined by their common adoption of some institutional innovation.

    “Finally, in the third form of CGS (selective imitation) preferential cooperation must also be dropped, as is obvious from Richerson et al.'s logic and examples.Group members are defined by their common adoption of some institutional innovationthat is all:”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Two of these mechanisms lack key features associated with group selection: they do not present group-level selection pressures counteracting individual-level ones, need not produce behavioral altruism, and do not require competition between groups whose members cooperate preferentially.

    “Two of these lack the key features associated with group selection: they do not present us with group-level selection pressures counteracting individual-level ones, need not produce behavioral altruism, and do not require competition between groups whose members cooperate preferentially with one another.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Language is a classic frequency-dependent group trait, but the exact design of particular languages is not generally considered to confer any particular benefit over any other, therefore it is unlikely that CGS is operating on languages.

    “While language is a classic frequency-dependent group trait, the exact design of particular languages is not generally considered to confer any particular benefit over any other, therefore it is unlikely that CGS is operating on languages.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Cultural diffusion need involve no demographic change, and no change in the composition of coalitions.

    “Cultural diffusion need involve no demographic change, and no change in the composition of coalitions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Type 3 CGS is sheer equilibrium selection with no differential growth, and no competition between coalitions.

    “Here, we have sheer equilibrium selection with no differential growth, and no competition between coalitions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    To be preferred as a partner requires striving to get resources and a reputation for sharing them.

    “Thus, to be preferred as a partner requires striving to get resources and a reputation for sharing them.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Social selection occurs for competition over resources other than matings.

    “West-Eberhard's core insight was that social selection occurs for competition over resources other than matings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites West-Eberhard 1979;1983
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given

    Partner choice is more important for explaining cooperation.

    “Social selection for competition opens up a whole world of important explanations, but partner choice is more important for explaining cooperation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.

    Interpretationreasoning

    To test three very different hypotheses as if they were one, is to test only their weakest common denominator.

    “Science needs lumpers as well as splitters; but to test three very different hypotheses as if they were one, is to test only their weakest common denominator.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given

    CGS does little to explain how the process gets going.

    “CGS is not, however, the only plausible explanation for extreme human prosociality, and it does little to explain how the process gets going.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The functional equivalent for CGS would be a group-level, cultural system with boundaries resistant to the introduction of competing cultural traits.

    “The functional equivalent for CGS would be a group-level, cultural system with boundaries resistant to the introduction of competing cultural traits.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The most desirable relationship partners pair with each other, and this selective association gives them a selective advantage.

    “The most desirable relationship partners pair with each other, and this selective association gives them a selective advantage.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The benefits experienced by prosocial individuals, and the benefits of preferring such individuals as partners or group members, shape social traits as extreme and costly as a peacock's tail.

    “The benefits experienced by prosocial individuals, and the benefits of preferring such individuals as partners or group members, shape social traits as extreme and costly as a peacock's tail.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This requires no kin selection, reciprocity, group selection, or CGS, although all of those phenomena are also involved in selecting for prosocial traits.

    “This requires no kin selection, reciprocity, group selection, or CGS, although all of those phenomena are also involved in selecting for prosocial traits.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationcitation

    After a tipping point was reached, investments in careful partner choice and traits that make one a preferred partner could coevolve in a possibly runaway process that may have been crucial in making culture possible.

    “After a tipping point was reached, however, investments in careful partner choice and traits that make one a preferred partner could coevolve in a possibly runaway process that may have been crucial in making culture possible (Nesse 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Nesse 2010
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation

    Kinship terminologies are symbolic, computational systems with an underlying, generative logic and no more emergent from behavior than is arithmetic; hence, their evolutionary change is at the global level of organization and not the population level of individual traits.

    “Kinship terminologies, with their algebraic-like structure (Leaf & Read 2012;Read 1984;2012;Read et al. 2014) are symbolic, computational systems with an underlying, generative logic and no more emergent from behavior than is arithmetic (contra Smaldino 2014)hence, their evolutionary change is at the global level of organization and not the population level of individual traits (see Lane et al. 2”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Leaf & Read 2012
    • cites Read 1984;2012
    • cites Read et al. 2014
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    The FST statistic belongs to a broad family of fixation indices developed by population geneticists to study genetic differentiation between populations.

    “The F ST statistic belongs to a broad family of “fixation indices”statistics developed by population geneticists to study genetic differentiation between populations (Holsinger & Weir 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Holsinger & Weir 2009
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The system of sealing partners expresses the cultural meaning of being a seal hunter and makes the actions of others, as hunters, predictable, hence forming the basis for cooperation among the sealing partners.

    “The system of sealing partners expresses the cultural meaning of being a seal hunter and makes the actions of others, as hunters, predictable, hence forming the basis for cooperation among the sealing partners.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Discontinuities in human genetic variation exist, typically associated with geographic obstacles, but many apparent genetic barriers are artefacts of heterogeneous spatial sampling.

    “Discontinuities do exist (typically associated with geographic obstacles), but many apparent genetic barriers have proven to be artefacts of heterogeneous spatial sampling (Handley et al. 2007).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Handley et al. 2007
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Shennan et al. (2015) found significant cultural differentiation at the group level, with geography predicting differentiation in ornaments but not pottery.

    “At the group level, they found significant cultural differentiation, with geography predicting differentiation in ornaments but not pottery.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shennan et al. 2015
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    Geographically close individuals/tales from neighbouring groups tend to be more similar than is suggested by the relatively large average cultural ΦST, thereby limiting the scope for cultural group selection.

    “This means that geographically close individuals/tales from neighbouring groups tend to be more similar than is suggested by the relatively large average cultural Φ ST , thereby limiting the scope for cultural group selection.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    In Brown et al. (2014), cultural ΦST was an order of magnitude smaller than genetic ΦST for the same groups, contra Bell et al.'s (2009) hypothesis that human groups generally show a higher degree of cultural differentiation than genetic differentiation.

    “Intriguingly, however, cultural Φ ST was found to be an order of magnitude smaller than genetic Φ ST for the same groups, contra Bell et al.'s (2009) hypothesis that human groups generally show a higher degree of cultural differentiation than genetic differentiation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Brown et al. 2014
    • cites Bell et al. 2009
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Shennan et al. (2015) found that at the level of individual artefacts, cultural affiliation was an independent predictor of pottery variation, while geography was not; but both cultural affiliation and geography were independent predictors of ornament variation.

    “At the level of individual artefacts, cultural affiliation was an independent predictor of pottery variation, while geography was not; but both cultural affiliation and geography were independent predictors of ornament variation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shennan et al. 2015
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The cooperative feature of Spanish Catholic culture was resisted by many conquered peoples, even while cultural traits irrelevant to differential success (e.g., names of deities) were adopted.

    “Nevertheless, this cooperative feature of Spanish Catholic culture was resisted by many of the conquered peoples, even while cultural traits irrelevant to differential success (e.g., the names of deities) were adopted.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Natural selection chooses activities that correlate either with Phylogenetically Important Events that ultimately enhance fitness or ontogenetic proxies of these PIEs.

    “Natural selection chooses those activities that correlate either with Phylogenetically Important Events (PIE) that ultimately enhance fitness or ontogenetic proxies of these PIEs (Baum 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Baum 2012
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    While cultural group selection may be a factor, other factors not accounted for by CGS, including the direct appeal of that trait or pure chance, can also explain which trait was adopted.

    “While CGS may be a factor, we can also appeal to other factors not accounted for by CGS, including the direct appeal of that trait or pure chance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.

    Interpretationreasoning

    To estimate an activity's effect on an individual's or a group's fitness, one needs to weigh the long-term effects of the sum of local acts against the long-term effect of the behavioral pattern as a whole.

    “To estimate an activity's effect on an individual's or a group's fitness, we need to weigh the long-term effects of the sum of local acts against the long-term effect of the behavioral pattern as a whole.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.

    Premisecitation

    The spread of religion in the face of differential success of cultural groups involves syncretism, defined as a type of acceptance characterized by conscious adaptation of an alien form or idea in terms of some indigenous counterpart instead of replacement of the indigenous trait by the foreign one.

    “On the contrary, it has long been recognized that the spread of religion in the face of differential success of cultural groups involves syncretism, defined as “a type of acceptance characterized by the conscious adaptation of an alien form or idea in terms of some indigenous counterpart” instead of the replacement of the indigenous trait by the foreign one (Madsen 1967, p. 369).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Madsen 1967
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given

    The key to understanding cooperation lies in understanding that the effect of an extended behavioral pattern does not equal-and might even be opposite to-the added effects of its parts.

    “The key to understanding cooperation lies in understanding that the effect of an extended behavioral pattern does not equaland might even be opposite tothe added effects of its parts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Although Mayan communities adopted saint worship from the conquering Spanish, Mayan saint worship tends to evince a more profound parochialism than did saint worship in 16th-century Spain, with Maya saints becoming decidedly local personages relatively independent of the remote God.

    “Although, for instance, Mayan communities adopted the practice of saint worship from the conquering Spanish, Mayan saint worship tends to “evince a more profound parochialism than did saint worship in 16th-century Spain.Cosmologically, Maya saints have become decidedly local personages relatively independent of the remote … God” (Watanabe 1990, p. 137).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Watanabe 1990
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Cultural groups in competitive situations adopt only some features of competing groups, or more frequently, new hybrid cultural traits emerge through the fusion of features from multiple groups.

    “Instead, cultural groups in competitive situations adopt only some features of competing groups, or more frequently, new hybrid cultural traits emerge through the fusion of features from multiple groups.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given

    In different environmental situations, natural selection occurring within groups and between groups may have different relative strengths.

    “In different environmental situations, natural selection occurring within groups and between groups may have different relative strengths.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Even if cooperation was selected because it commonly enhanced the individual's long-term fitness, it does not follow that cooperation enhances all cooperators' fitness, nor that all acts classified as parts of cooperative behavior do so.

    “Even if cooperation, defined as “working together toward a shared aim” (Wehmeier and Hornby 2000), was selected because it commonly enhanced the individual's long-term fitness, it neither follows that cooperation enhances all cooperators' fitness, nor that all acts that we classify as parts of cooperative behavior do so.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wehmeier and Hornby 2000
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation

    Cultural group selection leads to group-functional culture by selecting on cultural variation, but such selection presupposes that group-functional equilibria exist already, suggesting that other processes, including within-group dynamics, contribute to the emergence of group-functional culture.

    “CGS leads to group-functional culture by selecting on cultural variation (Boyd & Richerson 2010), but such selection presupposes that group-functional equilibria exist already, suggesting that other processes, including within-group dynamics, contribute to the emergence of groupfunctional culture.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Boyd & Richerson 2010
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationreasoning

    If enough group members cooperate in an activity such as recycling, those activities lead to fitness-enhancing PIEs or their proxies.

    “If, however, enough group members cooperate, those activities lead to fitness-enhancing PIEs or their proxies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Powerful rule-makers should continue to enforce group-functional rules as long as the rules satisfy their own perceived self-interest.

    “Considering the role of coercive rule-makers offers an alternative explanation not only for the origin of group-functional culture, but also for its maintenance, because powerful rule-makers should continue to enforce group-functional rules as long as the rules satisfy their own perceived self-interest.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given

    Asymmetries in power or influence allow parties to create and impose rules that satisfy their own interests.

    “The first emerges when asymmetries in power or influence allow parties to create and impose rules that satisfy their own interests.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationreasoning

    When power is more evenly distributed, coordinated groups of individuals can consensually create, modify, and enforce rules that control defection.

    “An alternative form of this hypothesis develops when power is more evenly distributed.In these cases, coordinated groups of individuals can consensually create, modify, and enforce rules that control defection.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In most instances, the whole group benefits from cooperative behavior, which means that those who contributed at their own immediate cost often do indeed benefit in the long run.

    “In most instances, however, the whole group benefits, which means that those who contributed at their own immediate cost often do indeed benefit in the long run.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Behavioral imitation is not the only form of social learning that could reduce intergroup cultural variation.

    “We would first like to note that behavioral imitation, which the authors focus on, is not the only form of social learning that could reduce intergroup cultural variation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Study design and conductnone given

    We chose questions that seem intuitively to be cultural and related to norms and institutions.

    “We did choose questions (see the appendix at the end of the target article) that seem intuitively to be cultural and related to norms and institutions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    We cannot be certain about the extent to which the traits represent culturally heritable variation as opposed to variation influenced by direct environmental effects or genetic variation.

    “but we cannot be certain about the extent to which the traits represent culturally heritable variation as opposed to variation influenced by direct environmental effects or genetic variation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationcitation

    Preschoolers' trust in a deceptive adult may be because they are more sensitive to violations of commonly held cultural knowledge.

    “Interestingly, this may be because preschoolers are more sensitive to violations of commonly held cultural knowledge (Stephens & Koenig 2015;Koenig & Stephens 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Stephens & Koenig 2015
    • cites Koenig & Stephens 2014
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Preschoolers sometimes trust a deceptive adult who provides inaccurate information about an object's location.

    “This is not to say that children are always critical in the face of message conflicts: Preschoolers have been found to trust a deceptive adult who provides inaccurate information about an object's location (Jaswal 2010;Jaswal et al. 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Jaswal 2010
    • cites Jaswal et al. 2010
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Study design and conductown data

    The individual-level data used to estimate F ST between cultural units provide a large number of responses collected from large samples.

    “The individual-level data that we used in section 4.1 to estimate F ST between various cultural units provide a large number of responses collected from large samples”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The selective learner's ability to critically evaluate cultural information on the basis of its accuracy, support, and coherence contributes to cultural group selection in two main ways: by reducing intergroup cultural variation through rational evaluation and adoption of outgroup information, and by ensuring accurate cultural transmission through evaluation of cultural information on accuracy,逻辑,

    “Along these lines, we would argue that the selective learner's ability to critically evaluate cultural information on the basis of its accuracy, support, and coherence contributes to CGS in two main ways.First, as previously described, the social learner can reduce intergroup cultural variation by rationally evaluating outgroup cultural information and adopting that which is deemed to be not only”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Differences in other cultural traits, such as subsistence strategy and bride wealth, are likely also important in the Nuer expansion.

    “Differences in other cultural traits, such as subsistence strategy and bride wealth, are likely also important.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The adaptive evolution of an altruistic trait must be due to group-level selection, though not necessarily cultural group selection.

    “The adaptive evolution of an altruistic trait therefore must be due to group-level selection (although not necessarily CGS).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Broader cultural differences between groups, or measurements across a range of cultural traits, may approximate the relevant suite of differences resulting in a cultural expansion due to group selection.

    “Further, broader cultural differences between groups, or measurements across a range of cultural traits, may approximate the relevant suite of differences resulting in a cultural expansion due to group selection.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The categories used to compute cultural F ST are in some sense ad hoc, in that the same individuals could be classified into other categories or groups and produce a different F ST value.

    “These categories are in some sense ad hoc, in that we could classify these same individuals into any number of other categories/groups and produce a different F ST value.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Every cultural or genetic trait can have its own evolutionary trajectory, and this trajectory can be decomposed using the Price equation into change due to individual-level and group-level effects.

    “Every cultural or genetic trait can have its own evolutionary trajectory, and this trajectory can be decomposed using the Price equation (Price 1970) into change due to individual-level and group-level effects.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Price 1970
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationreasoning

    There is no reason why we would need to limit cultural F ST calculations to beliefs or behaviors related to altruism or cooperation.

    “Further, (2) we note that there is no reason why we would need to limit cultural F ST calculations to beliefs or behaviors related to altruism or cooperation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisenone given

    Boundaries to the flow of culture between groups created by symbolic marking are never completely impermeable.

    “These boundaries are never completely impermeable.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Many human groups have formal criteria for membership and are often symbolically marked by language, dialect, and other differences.
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Study design and conductown data

    The data used to compute cultural F ST were obtained from opinion surveys which sampled units that the survey formulators considered to be meaningful social units.

    “However, the data we used were obtained from opinion surveys which sampled units that the survey formulators considered to be meaningful social units.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    The military expansion of the Nuer at the expense of the Dinka was presumably not just due to differences in political organization.

    “For example, the military expansion of the Nuer at the expense of the Dinka (Kelly 1985) is presumably not just due to differences in political organization.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kelly 1985
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The main thing all three forms of CGS have in common is that they are driven by variation among groups.

    “The main thing all three have in common is that they are driven by variation among groups.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given

    Clinal geographic structure is a kind of group structure, as is nominal group identification.

    “Clinal geographic structure is a kind of group structure, as is nominal group identification.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationcitation

    Defining the group structure of a human population is complicated.

    “Ross & Atkinson's finding that geographic variation explains more variation in folktales than currently observed”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ross & Atkinson
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisereasoning

    One form of CGS, the differential growth, proliferation, and extinction of cultural groups, is a form of natural selection.

    “Morin is quite right that one form of CGS we describe, the differential growth, proliferation, and extinction of cultural groups, is a form of natural selection.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisereasoning

    The other two forms of CGS, differential imitation and differential migration, are selective decision-making processes, not natural selection.

    “The other two, differential imitation and differential migration, are selective decision-making processes, not natural selection.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
278 of 278
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The most ancient human groups are the ethnolinguistic tribes into which simpler societies are generally divided.

    “The most ancient groups are the ethnolinguistic tribes into which simpler societies are generally divided.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The debate about the importance of CGS relative to competing explanations for human cooperation has not been fully engaged.

    “Heretofore, the debate about the importance of CGS relative to competing explanations for human cooperation has not been fully engaged.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Stone tool manufacture may go back three million years, and edge-wear evidence suggests that early stone tools were used to make a toolkit of perishable materials such as wood and hides.

    “Stone tool manufacture may go back three million years, and edge-wear evidence suggests that early stone tools were used to make a toolkit of perishable materials such as wood and hides.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Psychological and cognitive consequences of cooperative breeding in nonhuman primates also arose when our hominin ancestors, but none of the other great apes, started to engage in cooperative breeding.

    “It is thus most parsimonious to assume that such psychological and cognitive consequences also arose when our hominin ancestors, but none of the other great apes, started to engage in cooperative breeding”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Selection operates only on phenotypes, and phenotypes must develop before they are exposed to selection.

    “Because selection operates only on phenotypes, and phenotypes must develop before they are exposed to selection, we are skeptical of models of the evolution of cooperation that attribute fitness benefits to adults only.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Everyone's first group, tribe, society, institution, ethnolinguistic unit, and culture is the mother-infant group.

    “From the perspective of attachment theoryand infantseveryone's first group, tribe, society, institution, ethnolinguistic unit, and culture is the mother-infant group.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The debate on CGS lacks sufficient consideration of CGS's potential moderators.

    “the debate lacks sufficient consideration of CGS's potential moderators.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Substantive explanations of human evolution must be located within culture-led gene-culture coevolution.

    “Culture-led gene-culture coevolution is a framework within which substantive explanations of human evolution must be located.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Cultural group selection models assume that individuals copy the behaviour of others and acquire cooperative strategies via social learning.

    “A central assumption of CGS models is that individuals copy the behaviour of others and acquire cooperative strategies via social learning.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Cultural difference is one of the foundational assumptions of anthropology.

    “Cultural difference is one of the foundational assumptions of anthropology, so we should expect to find it.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The Netsilik did not trust a hunter to be altruistic or to voluntarily cooperate, and created an organizational system that depended on neither.

    “In their social contract, the Netsilik did not trust a hunter to be altruistic or to voluntarily cooperate, and they instead created an organizational system that depended on neither of these.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Individual Netsilik hunters would likely not survive without averaging hunting risks over a pool of hunters.

    “Cheating, in the sense of opting out of acting in accordance with being a sealing partner, was not a viable option in a context in which individual hunters would likely not survive without averaging hunting risks over a pool of hunters.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Information on variation within societies is very scanty compared to estimates of between-society variation.

    “Unfortunately, information on variation within societies is very scanty compared to estimates of between-society variation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Competition between the political units known as "countries" is seldom the key level at which selection takes place.

    “It is also undoubtedly the case that competition between the political units known as "countries" is seldom the key level at which selection takes place.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    A given classification of individuals into groups can be assumed for the purpose of calculating the scope for group selection on a focal cultural trait.

    “We simply illustrate that, if we assume a given classification of individuals into groups, we can calculate the scope for group selection to act on the focal cultural trait as a function of this classification.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Many human groups have formal criteria for membership and are often symbolically marked by language, dialect, and other differences.

    “It is true that many human groups have formal criteria for membership and are often symbolically marked by language, dialect, and other differences.”
16 of 16

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These informational shielding properties of MBs connect with debates regarding units of selection in evolutionary theory, in that only organismic phenotypes-and sometimes groups of organisms-are "visible" to natural selection with respect to phylogeny.

    “These informational shielding properties of MBs connect with debates regarding units of selection in evolutionary theory, in that only organismic phenotypes—and sometimes groups of organisms (Laland et al., 2015; Richerson et al., 2016)—are “visible” to natural selection with respect to phylogeny.”

    From An Integrated World Modeling Theory (IWMT) of Consciousness (2020) · cites this paper as Richerson et al., 2016

  • Hypotheses for the evolution of increased cooperation could in theory contribute to explaining why docility evolved.

    “Hypotheses for the evolution of increased cooperation could therefore in theory contribute to explaining why docility evolved (e.g., Henrich, 2016; Richerson et al., 2016).”
  • Gene-culture coevolution would then include selection in favor of an increasingly parochial-altruistic psychology: tendencies for docility and conformity would be favored because individuals with those characteristics would readily acquire group norms.

    “Gene-culture coevolution would then include selection in favor of an increasingly parochial-altruistic psychology: tendencies for docility and conformity would be favored because individuals with those characteristics would readily acquire group norms (Richerson et al., 2016).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Reported cultural F ST value falls below the stated minimum

    Minor

    The article says its reported F ST values are consistently greater than 0.01, but the appendix reports a value of 0.009.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Tilly, 1992, Coercion, capital and European states
  2. Hurford, 2011, The origins of grammar: Language in the light of evolution II
  3. Labov, 2001, Principles of linguistic change: Social factors, vol. 29
  4. Shariff, 2009, Evolution, culture, and the human brain, 119
  5. Turchin, 2003, Historical dynamics

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Richerson, P., Baldini, R., Bell, A. V., Demps, K., Frost, K., Hillis, V., Mathew, S., Newton, E. K., Naar, N., Newson, L., Ross, C., Smaldino, P. E., Waring, T. M., & Zefferman, M.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
  • Boise State University (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Dominican University of California (US)
  • Santa Fe Institute (US)
  • University of Maine (US)
  • National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis (US)
Venue
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Published
2014-10-28
Volume
39
Pages
e30-e30
ISSN
  • 0140-525X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1825
OpenAlex
W2155058526
Cited by
639
References
473
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 76 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 3
FWCI
108.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavioral and Brain Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarWorks (Boise State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (CAREER)
  • National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
cultural group selection, human cooperation, cultural transmission, institutions, norms, group competition, reciprocity, kin selection, multilevel selection, non-relatives
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Altruism, Competitive Behavior, Cooperative Behavior, Cultural Evolution, Biological Evolution, Group Processes, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Selection, Genetic, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review