The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Precious Records: Women in China’s Long Eighteenth Century
Abstract
This first book-length study of gender relations in the Lower Yangzi region during the High Qing era (c. 1683-1839) challenges enduring late-nineteenth-century perspectives that emphasized the oppression and subjugation of Chinese women. Placing women at the center of the High Qing era shows how gender relations shaped the economic, political, social, and cultural changes of the age, and gives us a sense of what women felt and believed, and what they actually did, during this period. Most analyses of gender in High Qing times have focused on literature and on the writings of the elite; this book broadens the scope of inquiry to include women's work in the farm household, courtesan entertainment, and women’s participation in ritual observances and religion. In dealing with literature, it shows how women's poetry can serve the historian as well as the literary critic, drawing on one of the first anthologies of women's writing compiled by a woman to examine not only literary sensibilities and intimate emotions, but also political judgments, moral values, and social relations. After an introductory chapter that evaluates the historiography of Chinese women, the book surveys High Qing history, charts the female life course, and discusses women's place in writing and learning, in entertainment, at work, and in religious practice. The concluding chapter returns to broad historiographic questions about where women figure in space and time and why we can no longer write histories that ignore them.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“During the Qing, these shinü shouzhen became an increasingly important category of 'exemplary women,' as patriarchal Neo-Confucian family customs spread through society.”
From The portrayal of women in the poetry of Jing’an Eight-Fingers (2020) · cites this paper as [49]
Citations
Cited by
Gender, Rural-Urban Inequality, and Intermarriage in China
Lui, L. (2016) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/sow076 · Cited by 53
Qing Reconstruction in the Southern Shaanxi Highlands: State Perceptions and Plans, 1799–1820
McMahon, D. (2009) · Late Imperial China · doi:10.1353/late.0.0020 · Cited by 7
The portrayal of women in the poetry of Jing’an Eight-Fingers
Bingenheimer, M., & Shen, T. (2020) · Studies in Chinese Religions · doi:10.1080/23729988.2020.1763680 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Mann, S.
- Corresponding author
- Mann, Susan
- Venue
- Stanford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Stanford University Press
- Published
- 1997-05-01
- OpenAlex
- W4298076451
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 3.72
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Stanford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Historical Gender and Feminism Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Keywords
- gender relations, women's history, women's poetry, women's writing, courtesans, women's education, women's political participation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.