The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Genealogical Classification of Semitic: The Lexical Isoglosses
Abstract
This volume is the first of its kind to offer a detailed, monographic treatment of Semitic genealogical classification. The introduction describes the author's methodological framework and surveys the history of the subgrouping discussion in Semitic linguistics, and the first chapter provides a detailed description of the proto-Semitic basic vocabulary. Each of its seven main chapters deals with one of the key issues of the Semitic subgrouping debate: the East/West dichotomy, the Central Semitic hypothesis, the North West Semitic subgroup, the Canaanite affiliation of Ugaritic, the historical unity of Aramaic, and the diagnostic features of Ethiopian Semitic and of Modern South Arabian. The book aims at a balanced account of all evidence pertinent to the subgrouping discussion, but its main focus is on the diagnostic lexical features, heavily neglected in the majority of earlier studies dealing with this subject. The author tries to assess the subgrouping potential of the vocabulary using various methods of its diachronic stratification. The hundreds of etymological comparisons given throughout the book can be conveniently accessed through detailed lexical indices.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The lexeme is broadly attested in Central and South Semitic languages: in Amorite, Canaanite ( ye-nu ); Ugaritic, Phoenician, and Ammonite ( yn ); Hebrew; Sabaean and Qatabanian ( wyn ); Arabic and Ge ʿ ez ( wayn ) (see Kogan 2015, 313 -14 for attestations).”
From The Significance of the Newly Found Amorite- Akkadian Bilinguals for Hebrew Lexicography (2025) · cites this paper as Kogan 2015
In the citing paper
“The noun is probably derived from the verbal root lḥ -m 'to eat'”
From Two Remarkable Vocabularies: Amorite-Akkadian Bilinguals! (2022) · cites this paper as Kogan 2015
In the citing paper
“The historical background of this type of broken plural formation has been discussed at some length in Kogan 2015: 476 -7, where it is considered one of the hallmarks of the linguistic identity of MSA.”
From The broken plural in Soqotri (2020) · cites this paper as Kogan 2015: 476-7
In the citing paper
“This rather marginal pattern can be plausibly connected with the Mehri pattern C1 e C2 y ō C3, extensively dealt with in Diem 1979: 64 -75 (see also Bittner 1909: 57 -58 and Kogan 2015: 469).”
From The broken plural in Soqotri (2020) · cites this paper as Kogan 2015
In the citing paper
“As argued in Kogan 2015: 474 -5, the traditional perception of such forms -both in Soqotri and throughout MSA -as reflecting the ' sound masculine plural ' 48 can scarcely be correct.”
From The broken plural in Soqotri (2020) · cites this paper as Kogan 2015: 474 -5
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Two Remarkable Vocabularies: Amorite-Akkadian Bilinguals!
George, A., & Krebernik, M. (2022) · Revue d'assyriologie et d'archéologie orientale · doi:10.3917/assy.116.0113 · Cited by 30
Kogan, L. (2020) · Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies · doi:10.1017/s0041977x19001137 · Cited by 1
Self-citationThe morphological pattern C 1 C 2 C 3 C 2 C 3 in Modern South Arabian
Castagna, G. (2026) · Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies · doi:10.1017/s0041977x26101128
Early Geez orthography in the ʔAbbā Garimā Gospels and in the Aksumite Epigraphic Geez
Bulakh, M. (2026) · Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies · doi:10.1017/s0041977x26101037
The Significance of the Newly Found Amorite- Akkadian Bilinguals for Hebrew Lexicography
Golinets, V. (2025) · Interconnected Traditions: Semitic Languages, Literatures, Cultures—A Festschrift for Geoffrey Khan · doi:10.11647/obp.0463.32
Metadata
- Authors
- Kogan, L.
- Corresponding author
- Kogan, Leonid
- ORCID
- Kogan, Leonid
- Venue
- De Gruyter eBooks
- Publisher
- DE GRUYTER
- Published
- 2015-05-27
- OpenAlex
- W2236929081
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 2.37
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- De Gruyter eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and language evolution
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Keywords
- Semitic languages, genealogical classification, East-West dichotomy, Ugaritic language, Aramaic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review