Cited by 20Ancient Near East HistoryBiblical Studies and InterpretationAncient Egypt and Archaeology

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Royal Inscriptions of Amēl-Marduk (561–560 BC), Neriglissar (559–556 BC), and Nabonidus (555–539 BC), Kings of Babylon

Open access
Weiershäuser, Frauke, Novotny, Jamie·2020·Penn State University Press eBooks

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/9781646021178

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 20

Metadata

Authors
Weiershäuser, F., & Novotny, J.
Affiliations
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Venue
Penn State University Press eBooks
Published
2020-11-01
OpenAlex
W4239970756
Cited by
20
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3
FWCI
5.54
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Penn State University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Penn State University Press eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Ancient Near East History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
Keywords
Nabonidus, Babylonian kings, royal inscriptions, Neo-Babylonian Empire, Neo-Babylonian period

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review