Cited by 28Ancient Near East HistoryBiblical Studies and InterpretationAncient Egypt and Archaeology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 12 of the 120 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

The Neo-Babylonian Empire

Open access
Jursa, Michael·2023·The Oxford History of the Ancient Near East Volume V

Abstract

As an accidental heir to major parts of the Assyrian Empire, the Neo-Babylonian Empire controlled in the sixth century bc much of the Middle East before falling to the rising Persian Empire. Imperial domination in Syria and especially the Levant led to large-scale destruction and deprivation, for which the case of Jerusalem and the Judeans’ “Babylonian exile” is the most consequential example. At the same time, the imperial center in Babylonia profited greatly from the inflowing spoils of empire, and the crown initiated an ambitious program of centralized institution-building. The physical transformation of Babylonian cities by large-scale royal building projects is but one feature of the resulting political and socioeconomic transformation.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Jursa synthesizes textual and archaeological evidence to argue that the Neo-Babylonian Empire was an accidental heir to Assyria that centralized its Babylonian core under Nebuchadnezzar while exercising only superficial control over most of its western periphery. Its core saw unprecedented economic growth and monetization, but the empire fell quickly to Cyrus in 539 BC without clear evidence that structural weakness caused its collapse.

Key findings

  • Politically, Nabopolassar’s revolt from 626 BC and alliance with the Medes destroyed Assyria; Nebuchadnezzar II (604–562 BC) built the empire through campaigns in the Levant, taking Jerusalem in 598 BC and again in 587/586 BC, while Nabonidus spent ten of his seventeen years in northern Arabia, based at Tayma. Cyrus defeated the Babylonian army at Opis, and Sippar and Babylon opened their gates on October 10 and 12, 539 BC.
  • The empire’s core was centralized under Nebuchadnezzar, but the periphery was held through a network of strategic cities and vassals; the 598 BC Hofkalender lists palace officials, tribal and provincial magnates, city officials, and seven Levantine vassal kings including Tyre, Gaza, Sidon, Arwad, and Ashdod, but no king of Judah.
  • The political economy extracted resources from temples and urban households: taxes on temple income amounted to between 2.15 and 8.3 percent, while royal building projects brought silver into circulation and raised wheat wages to 9.6–14.4 liters, compared with 3.5–6.5 liters in most of antiquity and 4.8–8 liters in late third/early second millennium BC.
  • Economic growth was substantial: cereal farming in the sixth century produced about 25 percent higher returns than in the Middle Bronze Age; by the sixth century close to half the population lived in cities of more than ten hectares; and roughly 126 million mudbricks for one building project represent about 1,031,000 man-days, or one thousand brick-makers working for three years.

Methods

  • Narrative historical synthesis drawing on Babylonian cuneiform legal and administrative tablets, temple archives (especially Eanna and Ebabbar), private archives, chronicles, royal inscriptions, the Hebrew Bible, Greek authors such as Herodotus and Berossus, Aramaic texts, and archaeological survey and excavation.
  • No new primary data collection or formal statistical model; the chapter reconstructs political history, state structure, political economy, and society/economy from published editions and secondary literature, with quantitative figures drawn from prior work such as Jursa 2010a.
  • Source-critical analysis of competing accounts, especially for Nabonidus, where royal inscriptions, the Royal Chronicle, the Nabonidus Chronicle, the Verse Account, and the Cyrus Cylinder are compared for bias and agenda.

Limitations

  • Stated: cuneiform sources are abundant for the core’s society and economy but less informative for political history and the western periphery; surviving state archives are not comparable to Assyria’s; chronicles originated in priestly concerns; royal inscriptions focus on building and cult and rarely mention military or internal politics; archaeological evidence for Babylonian presence beyond destruction levels is often contentious; and a comprehensive synthesis of regional approaches remains to be written.
  • Stated: later hostile sources on Nabonidus—the Cyrus Cylinder, Verse Account, and arguably the Nabonidus Chronicle—have their own agendas and limit reconstruction of his reign; some antiquities “discovered” for Nabonidus may have been forgeries.
  • Evident: the chapter is an interpretive synthesis rather than a systematic test, and its quantitative claims depend on uneven corpora and cited prior studies rather than new measurement.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oso/9780190687663.003.0050

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

12 of 120 cited sources checked · 8 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Interpretationreasoning
    § 31. Kahn 2018: 72-78.

    Together with Carchemish on the Euphrates, Riblah on the Orontes river, and perhaps Harran on the Balikh river, Tyre was thus one of the few urban centers upon which the Babylonians based their control of the region.

    “Together with Carchemish on the Euphrates, Riblah on the Orontes river, and perhaps Harran on the Balikh river, Tyre was thus one of the few urban centers upon which the Babylonians based their control of the region.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Levavi 2020 source

      Section 1.2 names Carchemish, Harran and Riblah as cities under permanent Babylonian control, but presents that list as part of a traditional model of limited domination. Section 4 reports a heavy, steady Babylonian presence in Tyre from around Nebuchadnezzar’s 30th year. The paper does not say that Tyre joined those cities as one of the few urban bases for controlling the region. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation
    § 21. Fuchs 2014.

    Clay tablets written in Babylonian document the daily life of the deported Judeans, not only in Babylon itself, but particularly also in the rural and relatively underdeveloped areas of Babylonia where they were settled.

    “Clay tablets written in Babylonian document the daily life of the deported Judeans, not only in Babylon itself, but particularly also in the rural and relatively underdeveloped areas of Babylonia where they were settled.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Alstola 2020 source
  • Interpretationcitation
    § 31. Kahn 2018: 72-78.

    It is likely that the region's polities submitted formally to Babylonian dominion in the beginning of the sixth century.

    “It is likely that the region's polities submitted formally to Babylonian dominion in the beginning of the sixth century.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Joannès 1991 source

      In “Les rapports politiques avec la Cilicie” (p. 263), Joannès says Babylonian dominion over eastern Cilicia (Humé) was established under Nebuchadnezzar II, but Pirindu was held less securely. The paper does not say that the region’s polities formally submitted at the beginning of the sixth century. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation
    § 31. Kahn 2018: 72-78.

    In the Khabur valley further east, the best evidence of Babylonian control from the late seventh century onward comes from the site of Tell Sheikh Hamad, the old Assyrian city of Dur-Katlimmu.

    “In the Khabur valley further east, the best evidence of Babylonian control from the late seventh century onward comes from the site of Tell Sheikh Hamad, the old Assyrian city of Dur-Katlimmu.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Radner 2002

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Kreppner 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Levavi 2020 source
  • Interpretationcitation
    § 50.5. The Neo-Babylonian Empire's political economy

    The evidence of colony-building in the Khabur valley and perhaps in the region of Tyre shows that the model of superficial domination was not followed consistently everywhere and throughout the entire period of Neo-Babylonian domination.

    “The evidence of “colony-building” in the Khabur valley and perhaps in the region of Tyre shows that this model was not followed consistently everywhere and throughout the entire period of Neo-Babylonian domination, 181”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Levavi 2020 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 136
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 61
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 31. Kahn 2018: 72-78.

    In a palace-like residence that was in use from late Assyrian times into the Neo-Babylonian period, cuneiform tablets written in the Assyrian language and in an Assyrian format, but dated to the second and fifth years of Nebuchadnezzar, have been recovered: in the area, at that time, Babylonian control was based on the collaboration of the local, Assyrian elites.

    “In a palace-like residence that was in use from late Assyrian times into the Neo-Babylonian period, cuneiform tablets written in the Assyrian language and in an Assyrian format, but dated to the second and fifth years of Nebuchadnezzar, have been recovered: in the area, at that time, Babylonian control was based on the collaboration of the local, Assyrian elites.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Radner 2002

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Kreppner 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Levavi 2020 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 202. The most incisive pertinent study is Waerzeggers 2010.

    The archives of the deported Judeans are in Babylonian, and one family of (probably) prosperous royal merchants of Judean descent eventually forged a bond of marriage with a Babylonian non-priestly clan.

    “The archives of the deported Judeans are in Babylonian, and one family of (probably) prosperous royal merchants of Judean descent eventually forged a bond of marriage with a Babylonian non-priestly clan.214”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Alstola 2020: 79-101 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingcitation
    § Abstract

    Museums house tens of thousands of clay tablets containing administrative and legal content dated to this period, and around 18,000 texts are published or at least accessible to researchers.

    “Museums house tens of thousands of clay tablets containing administrative and legal content dated to this period, and around 18,000 texts are published or at least accessible to researchers.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jursa 2005
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingcitation
    § 50.5. The Neo-Babylonian Empire's political economy

    Babylonian texts show that three men produced 11,000 bricks per month, so 126 million bricks roughly represent the labor of 1,031,000 man-days, or one thousand brick-makers working constantly for three years.

    “Babylonian texts show that three men produced 11,000 bricks per month, so 126 million bricks roughly represent the labor of 1,031,000 man-days, or one thousand brick-makers working constantly for three years.191”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jursa 2010a: 680

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingcitation
    § 50.5. The Neo-Babylonian Empire's political economy

    The previously quoted Nabonidus inscription also mentions the dedication of 2,850 prisoners from Cilicia to the same three temples, but it is an exception.

    “The previously quoted Nabonidus inscription also mentions the dedication of 2,850 prisoners from Cilicia to the same three temples, but it is an exception.184”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Schaudig 2001: 521: no.3.3a: ix 31′-41′

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Weiershäuser and Novotny 2020: no.3: ix 31′-41′ source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given
    § 50.3. A sketch of the Neo-Babylonian Empire's political history

    Sennacherib's successor Esarhaddon (680-669 bc) ushered in a comparatively peaceful phase of Assyrian-Babylonian relations; Babylon was rebuilt, but the country remained under Assyrian control.

    “Sennacherib's successor Esarhaddon (680-669 bc) ushered in a comparatively peaceful phase of Assyrian-Babylonian relations; Babylon was rebuilt, but the country remained under Assyrian control.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § 50.3. A sketch of the Neo-Babylonian Empire's political history

    Throughout most of this period, Chaldeans competed for the throne in Babylon against Babylonian pretenders, and for a while kingship may have rotated among the three major Chaldean tribes of Bit-Dakkuri, Bit-Amukani, and Bit-Yakin.

    “Throughout most of this period, Chaldeans competed for the throne in Babylon against Babylonian pretenders, and for a while kingship may have rotated among the three major Chaldean tribes of Bit-Dakkuri, Bit-Amukani, and Bit-Yakin.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Brinkman 1984

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 31. Kahn 2018: 72-78.

    The old Assyrian heartland on the Tigris likewise ended up under Babylonian control after the fall of Assyria, but this may have been a very loose control.

    “The old Assyrian heartland on the Tigris likewise ended up under Babylonian control after the fall of Assyria, but this may have been a very loose control.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    They focus mostly on the kings' building activities, in particular on temple building, but also on the construction of palaces, city walls, and canals.

    “They focus mostly on the kings' building activities, in particular on temple building, but also on the construction of palaces, city walls, and canals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Da Riva 2008

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given
    § 21. Fuchs 2014.

    In 606 bc a major clash at the Euphrates crossing at Carchemish ended with an Egyptian victory, but in 605 bc, Nebuchadnezzar had his revenge.

    “In 606 bc a major clash at the Euphrates crossing at Carchemish ended with an Egyptian victory, but in 605 bc, Nebuchadnezzar had his revenge.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisereasoning
    § Abstract

    Archaeology fills some, but not all, of the gaps left by the textual sources.

    “Archaeology fills some, but not all, of the gaps left by the textual sources.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given
    § 21. Fuchs 2014.

    Judah's king, Jehoiakim, sided with the Egyptians against the Babylonians, but ultimately the latter proved stronger and in 598 bc Jerusalem was taken by the Babylonian army.

    “Judah's king, Jehoiakim, sided with the Egyptians against the Babylonians, but ultimately the latter proved stronger and in 598 bc Jerusalem was taken by the Babylonian army.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisenone given
    § Abstract

    The Babylonian text corpus originated in southern Mesopotamia, i.e., from the heartland of the empire.

    “The Babylonian text corpus originated in southern Mesopotamia, i.e., from the heartland of the empire.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § 21. Fuchs 2014.

    In Judah, archaeological surveys reveal widespread destruction and a massive reduction of population density.

    “In Judah, archaeological surveys reveal widespread destruction and a massive reduction of population density.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Faust 2012

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § 31. Kahn 2018: 72-78.

    Tyre, Sidon, and Arwad contributed to palace-building work in Babylon, according to an inscription of Nebuchadnezzar datable to his seventh year (598/597 bc): their rulers had submitted to Babylonian suzerainty.

    “Tyre, Sidon, and Arwad contributed to palace-building work in Babylon, according to an inscription of Nebuchadnezzar datable to his seventh year (598/ 597 bc): their rulers had submitted to Babylonian suzerainty.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Da Riva 2013b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § 50.3. A sketch of the Neo-Babylonian Empire's political history

    New population groups appeared: (originally) nomadic Arameans settled in the Tigris area, and Chaldeans along the Euphrates and in the far south of Babylonia.

    “New population groups appeared: (originally) nomadic Arameans settled in the Tigris area, and Chaldeans along the Euphrates and in the far south of Babylonia.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Brinkman 1968
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Abstract

    These texts allow us to reconstruct the society and economy of the Neo-Babylonian Empire in its core in considerable detail and thereby demonstrate the economic consequences of imperial rule.

    “These texts allow us to reconstruct the society and economy of the Neo-Babylonian Empire in its core in considerable detail and thereby demonstrate the economic consequences of imperial rule.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisereasoning
    § Abstract

    A comprehensive synthesis uniting the results of regional approaches with limited focus from modern-day Israel, Lebanon, Syria, and Jordan (to name the most important) remains to be written.

    “A comprehensive synthesis uniting the results of regional approaches with limited focus from modernday Israel, Lebanon, Syria, and Jordan (to name the most important) remains to be written.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Lipschits and Blenkinsopp 2003

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Lipschits 2005

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Faust 2012

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisenone given
    § 50.3. A sketch of the Neo-Babylonian Empire's political history

    Assyrian aggression against Babylonia peaked for the first time in 689 bc, when King Sennacherib (704-681 bc) ordered that Babylon and its temples be sacked and destroyed.

    “Assyrian aggression against Babylonia peaked for the first time in 689 bc, when King Sennacherib (704-681 bc) ordered that Babylon and its temples be sacked and destroyed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given
    § 50.3. A sketch of the Neo-Babylonian Empire's political history

    This arrangement was unsuccessful, as Šamaš-šumu-ukin caused most of Babylonia to rise in rebellion against Ashurbanipal-a rebellion (652-648 bc) that was brutally crushed by the Assyrians.

    “This arrangement was unsuccessful, as Šamaš-šumu-ukin caused most of Babylonia to rise in rebellion against Ashurbanipal-a rebellion (652-648 bc) that was brutally crushed by the Assyrians.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisenone given
    § 50.3. A sketch of the Neo-Babylonian Empire's political history

    After the deaths of Ashurbanipal and Kandalanu, a new period of upheaval and war began in 627 bc.

    “After the deaths of Ashurbanipal and Kandalanu, a new period of upheaval and war began in 627 bc.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 31. Kahn 2018: 72-78.

    While the Neo-Babylonian Empire ended up the undisputed (if incidental) heir of the Assyrian Empire in the Levant, in Cilicia, and probably all along the Syrian Euphrates, the situation is less clear for the Syrian Jezirah, the plain between the Euphrates and the Tigris.

    “While the Neo-Babylonian Empire ended up the undisputed (if incidental) heir of the Assyrian Empire in the Levant, in Cilicia, and probably all along the Syrian Euphrates, the situation is less clear for the Syrian Jezirah, the plain between the Euphrates and the Tigris.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given
    § 50.4. State structure: a view from the center

    Babylonia in southern Mesopotamia was the heartland of the Neo-Babylonian Empire, the region where it was born, where the forces that shaped it resided, and where the spoils of war and tribute extracted from the periphery of the empire were taken.

    “Babylonia in southern Mesopotamia was the heartland of the Neo-Babylonian Empire, the region where it was born, where the forces that shaped it resided, and where the spoils of war and tribute extracted from the periphery of the empire were taken.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § 21. Fuchs 2014.

    For several successive years, the Babylonian army campaigned in Western Syria and the Levant, sacking cities such as Ashkelon, taking booty or receiving tribute from the local rulers who were quick enough to surrender.

    “For several successive years, the Babylonian army campaigned in Western Syria and the Levant, sacking cities such as Ashkelon, taking booty or receiving tribute from the local rulers who were quick enough to surrender.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Glassner 2004

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisenone given
    § 50.3. A sketch of the Neo-Babylonian Empire's political history

    After the final defeat of the rebels, Babylonia was ruled for the Assyrians by the puppet-king Kandalanu.

    “After the final defeat of the rebels, Babylonia was ruled for the Assyrians by the puppet-king Kandalanu.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 21. Fuchs 2014.

    Throughout the southern Levant archaeological evidence, such as destruction levels associated with the distinctive type of arrowheads used by the Babylonians or their Median auxiliaries, attest to the widespread destruction wrought by these Babylonian raids-they cannot be termed attempts at permanent conquest, given the absence of consistent investment in local garrisons and other institutions of

    “Throughout the southern Levant archaeological evidence, such as destruction levels associated with the distinctive type of arrowheads used by the Babylonians or their Median auxiliaries, attest to the widespread destruction wrought by these Babylonian raids-they cannot be termed attempts at permanent conquest, given the absence of consistent investment in local garrisons and other institutions of”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Dugaw et al. 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Vanderhooft 2003 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § 50.3. A sketch of the Neo-Babylonian Empire's political history

    Beginning in the second half of the eighth century, Assyrian expansion increasingly threatened Babylonian independence and statehood, and the country was neither sufficiently powerful nor united to mount an effective resistance.

    “Beginning in the second half of the eighth century, Assyrian expansion increasingly threatened Babylonian independence and statehood, and the country was neither sufficiently powerful nor united to mount an effective resistance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Brinkman 1984

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Frame 1992

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 31. Kahn 2018: 72-78.

    The main objective of the campaign was clearly military, and at least in part defensive, or a response to past aggressions.

    “The main objective of the campaign was clearly military, and at least in part defensive, or a response to past aggressions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 31. Kahn 2018: 72-78.

    The episode in Herodotus which describes a conflict that had broken out between the Lydians (from Asia Minor) and the Medes in 585 bc and was settled by Babylonian diplomatic intervention belongs to the same context; the Babylonians clearly were the dominant power in the region at the time.

    “The episode in Herodotus which describes a conflict that had broken out between the Lydians (from Asia Minor) and the Medes in 585 bc and was settled by Babylonian diplomatic intervention belongs to the same context; the Babylonians clearly were the dominant power in the region at the time.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Beaulieu 1989

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § 50.3. A sketch of the Neo-Babylonian Empire's political history

    In 614 bc, the Medes destroyed Assur, and the capital Nineveh fell to a joint Median-Babylonian attack in 612 bc.

    “In 614 bc, the Medes destroyed Assur, and the capital Nineveh fell to a joint Median-Babylonian attack in 612 bc.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Glassner 2004

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given
    § 21. Fuchs 2014.

    He inflicted a heavy defeat on the Egyptian army and subsequently gained control of the Euphrates bend and the Orontes valley around Hama.

    “He inflicted a heavy defeat on the Egyptian army and subsequently gained control of the Euphrates bend and the Orontes valley around Hama.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 50.3. A sketch of the Neo-Babylonian Empire's political history

    Ashurbanipal's siege of Babylon and the subsequent sack of the city mark the nadir of Babylonia's fortunes in the first half of the first millennium bc.

    “Ashurbanipal's siege of Babylon and the subsequent sack of the city mark the nadir of Babylonia's fortunes in the first half of the first millennium bc.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § 50.3. A sketch of the Neo-Babylonian Empire's political history

    Nabopolassar was only able to overcome Assyrian resistance from 615 bc onward, after having entered into an alliance with the (probably superior) Median forces from northwestern Iran that had independently begun to attack the Assyrian heartland.

    “Nabopolassar was only able to overcome Assyrian resistance from 615 bc onward, after having entered into an alliance with the (probably superior) Median forces from northwestern Iran that had independently begun to attack the Assyrian heartland ( chapter 43 in volume 4).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Glassner 2004

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given
    § 21. Fuchs 2014.

    The second Babylonian siege of Jerusalem in 587 or 586 bc ended with the conquest and sacking of the city, the destruction of its temple, and further and much more widespread deportations of Judeans to Babylonia.

    “The second Babylonian siege of Jerusalem in 587 or 586 bc ended with the conquest and sacking of the city, the destruction of its temple, and further and much more widespread deportations of Judeans to Babylonia.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 21. Fuchs 2014.

    It is certain that the southern Levant remained a contested area and that Babylonian control over the region was at best unstable.

    “It is certain that the southern Levant remained a contested area and that Babylonian control over the region was at best unstable.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 31. Kahn 2018: 72-78.

    In the case of the major power in the region, Tyre, this submission was temporary, however: later in the reign of Nebuchadnezzar the city rebelled, probably in response to renewed Egyptian attempts to re-establish their control over the Levant.

    “In the case of the major power in the region, Tyre, this submission was temporary, however: later in the reign of Nebuchadnezzar the city rebelled, probably in response to renewed Egyptian attempts to re-establish their control over the Levant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § 70. Jursa 2014b: 131-133.

    Nabonidus's family originated in Harran, going back to Assyrian times, and was clearly affiliated to the house of Nabopolassar and Nebuchadnezzar.

    “Nabonidus's family has its origins in the city of Harran, going back to Assyrian times, and was clearly affiliated to the house of Nabopolassar and Nebuchadnezzar.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § 90. The following draws on Jursa and

    Within three years, Cyrus, king of Anšan, rose against Astyages, king of the Medes, scattered the vast hordes of the Medes with few troops, captured Astyages, bound him, and took him to his country.

    “within three years, the gods made Cyrus, the king of Anšan, his humble servant (arassu ṣahru) rise against him (i.e., against Astyages, the king of the Medes), and he (Cyrus) scattered with his few troops the vast hordes of the Medes, captured Astyages, the king of the Medes, bound him and took him to his country.126”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [126]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 90. The following draws on Jursa and

    The explicit claim that a king could draw his own conclusions from evidence in opposition to priestly expert opinion is unusual in Babylonia in general but can also be found in other texts referring to Nabonidus.

    “this explicit claim that a king was able to draw his own conclusions on the basis of the evidence, in opposition to priestly expert opinion, is unusual in Babylonia in general, but can also be found in other texts that refer to Nabonidus.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisenone given
    § 56. Jursa 2014b.

    The institutions of the Neo-Babylonian Empire's core are not fundamentally different from those of other Ancient Near Eastern monarchies of the Iron Age.

    “At first glance, the institutions of the Neo-Babylonian Empire's core are not fundamentally different from that of the other Ancient Near Eastern monarchies of the Iron Age.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § 70. Jursa 2014b: 131-133.

    Neriglissar had been in charge of a large province east of the Tigris (bīt simmagir), was the son of the chief of the Aramean Puqudu tribe, and was one of the leaders of the Babylonian army at the siege of Jerusalem.

    “Neriglissar had been in charge of a large province east of the Tigris (known as the bīt simmagir) and was the son of the chief of the Aramean Puqudu tribe; he was one of the leaders of the Babylonian army at the siege of Jerusalem.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [73]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § 70. Jursa 2014b: 131-133.

    In larger cities, the power of priests was balanced by city governors recruited from local elite families; large cities had a priestly šatammu and a šākin ṭēmi, whereas smaller cities had only a šangû.

    “Only in larger cities was their power balanced by city governors who, like priests, were recruited from the families of local elites: thus large cities had a priestly šatammu (“bishop”) and a šākin ṭēmi (“city governor”), whereas smaller cities had only a šangû (“chief priest”).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [81]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisereasoning
    § 90. The following draws on Jursa and

    The inscription narrates the (re)construction of the temples dedicated to the moon god and his cult in Ur; more old inscriptions were found, and the temple reconstruction precisely followed the ancient models.

    “The inscription then proceeds to narrate the (re)construction of the temples dedicated to the moon god and his cult in Ur; more old inscriptions were found, and the temple reconstruction precisely followed the ancient models.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 90. The following draws on Jursa and

    Nabonidus's building activities were actually forgeries made to satisfy the king's interest in antiquities while furthering the case of the local priesthood that stood to gain from the king's investments.

    “his building activities are actually forgeries made to satisfy the king's interest in antiquities while furthering the case of the local priesthood that stood to gain from the king's investments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § 64. Da Riva 2013b.

    Some titles in the Hofkalender are ceremonial, with literal meanings unrelated to actual duties, while other titles precisely circumscribe the function of the office.

    “Some titles are ceremonial, with literal meanings that bear no relationship to the actual duties attached to the office, while other titles do circumscribe the function of the office precisely.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Premisecitation
    § 90. The following draws on Jursa and

    A project particularly close to Nabonidus's heart was the reconstruction of the temple of Sîn in Harran, where his mother Adda-guppi had lived and cultivated a particular devotion to the moon god.

    “A project particularly close to the king's heart was the reconstruction of the temple of Sîn in the city of Harran, where Nabonidus's mother”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given
    § 90. The following draws on Jursa and

    A stele of an entu priestess bearing an inscription of Nebuchadnezzar I (1125-1104 bc) turned up on the site and was brought to the king's attention, along with clay and wax tablets containing the pertinent rituals.

    “So it was very convenient that not only a stele of such a priestess, bearing an inscription of the famous Babylonian ruler Nebuchadnezzar I (1125-1104 bc), turned up on the site and was brought to the king's attention, but also clay and wax tablets that contained the pertinent rituals!”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § 56. Jursa 2014b.

    The land of Akkad included tribal regions (Aramean Puqudu and Chaldean Bit-Amukani) and the old cities Babylon, Borsippa, Kiš, Nippur, Cutha, and Sippar.

    “It included some tribal regions (Aramean Puqudu and Chaldean Bit-Amukani) and the most important old cities, Babylon, Borsippa, Kiš, Nippur, Cutha, and Sippar”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § 64. Da Riva 2013b.

    The dignitaries in the Hofkalender are divided into palace officials, governors of provinces and tribal areas, and officials in charge of the Babylonian cities of the alluvium, representing the crown, the tribes, and the cities, the three principal political stakeholders in Babylonia.

    “These dignitaries are divided into: palace officials, that is, the men forming the king's entourage; governors of provinces and tribal areas; and officials in charge of the Babylonian cities of the alluvium.Thus they represent the crown, the tribes, and the cities, the three principal political stakeholders in Babylonia.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [64]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 90. The following draws on Jursa and

    Nabonidus had campaigned in the northwest at the very beginning of his reign and would have been familiar with the situation in Syria from his time as a military man under Nebuchadnezzar.

    “He had campaigned in the northwest at the very beginning of his reign, and would also have been familiar with the situation in Syria from his time as a military man under Nebuchadnezzar.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 90. The following draws on Jursa and

    This passage gives insight not only into the religious interests of the Babylonian king but also into his overall political views.

    “this passage gives an insight not only into the religious interests of the Babylonian king, but also into his overall political views.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premiseown data
    § 90. The following draws on Jursa and

    In the dream, when Nabonidus objected to Marduk that the might of the Medes might preclude the venture, the god predicted their imminent fall.

    “In his dream, when Nabonidus objected to Marduk that the might of the Medes might preclude such a venture, the god predicted their imminent fall.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § 90. The following draws on Jursa and

    Only on his third attempt, when he suggested his own daughter, did Nabonidus receive divine confirmation and proceed with her consecration.

    “Only on his third attempt, when he suggested his own daughter, did he receive divine confirmation: he therefore proceeded with the consecration of his daughter.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 90. The following draws on Jursa and

    This clarifies the motivation that led to the 'discovery' of the stele and the accompanying written documentation.

    “This clarifies the motivation that led to the”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 70. Jursa 2014b: 131-133.

    The relationship between the royal establishment and the Babylonian cities and their civic and temple institutions played out more clearly in the crown's favor, and here we have a more detailed picture.

    “The second major arena of inter-Babylonian politics, the relationship between the royal establishment and the Babylonian cities and their civic and temple institutions, played out more clearly in the crown's favor, and here we also have a more detailed picture.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given
    § 56. Jursa 2014b.

    The Assyrian state archives of the seventh century prove the decisive role taken by the tribes in Babylonian politics in that period and have no later counterpart.

    “the Assyrian state archives of the seventh century that prove the decisive role taken by the tribes in Babylonian politics in that period have no later counterpart.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 50.4. State structure: a view from the center

    The third was the Assyrian imperial tradition, which not only carved out most of the geographical space the Neo-Babylonian Empire came to dominate, as its partly fortuitous or opportunistic heir; it also bequeathed on the later empire some of its governmental institutions.

    “The third was the Assyrian imperial tradition, which not only carved out most of the geographical space the Neo-Babylonian Empire came to dominate, as its partly fortuitous or opportunistic heir; it also bequeathed on the later empire some of its governmental institutions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jursa 2014b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premiseown data
    § 90. The following draws on Jursa and

    The inscription's final section details Nabonidus's donations to the cult of the moon god and his munificence toward his priesthood.

    “The inscription's final section, excepting the wish for the blessing with which the text closes, details the king's donations to the cult of the moon god and his munificence toward his priesthood:”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § 90. The following draws on Jursa and

    The extispicy yielded confirmation of the general message but two negative responses when Nabonidus proposed specific women from his family as priestesses.

    “This yielded a confirmation of the general message, but two negative responses when Nabonidus proposed specific women from his family as priestesses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § 90. The following draws on Jursa and

    The Royal Chronicle embellishes this narrative by providing details of the gods' oracular responses and pointing out that only the king knew how to interpret the astrological omen correctly.

    “The Royal Chronicle embellishes this narrative by providing the details of the gods' oracular responses and pointing out that it was only the king who knew how to interpret the astrological omen correctly 123”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [123]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § 64. Da Riva 2013b.

    Many Neo-Babylonian court titles were originally Assyrian, and the tasks assigned to these offices were the same in both court systems; structurally, the Neo-Babylonian court was built according to an Assyrian model.

    “Many of these titles were originally Assyrian, and the tasks assigned to these offices were the same in both court systems; structurally, the Neo-Babylonian court was built according to an Assyrian model.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [67]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § 56. Jursa 2014b.

    A slight variant of the royal image is found in the iconographic language of Babylonian rock reliefs in the recently conquered western parts of the empire; these drew on Neo-Assyrian precedents and implicitly claimed the legitimacy of the Babylonians' Mesopotamian imperial predecessors.

    “A slight variant of this royal image is found in the iconographic language of Babylonian rock reliefs in the recently conquered western parts of the empire.These drew on Neo-Assyrian precedents and thereby implicitly claimed the legitimacy of the Babylonians' Mesopotamian imperial predecessors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [63]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 90. The following draws on Jursa and

    Nabonidus would have keenly watched as a new geopolitical status quo unfolded in the north, as suggested by the Nabonidus Chronicle, which recorded Cyrus's conquest of Lydia in Asia Minor in Nabonidus's ninth year (547 bc).

    “He would have keenly watched as a new geopolitical status quo unfolded in the north, as indeed is also suggested by the Nabonidus Chronicle, which duly recorded the next step in Cyrus's rise: his conquest of the kingdom of Lydia in Asia Minor in Nabonidus's ninth year (547 bc).129”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [129]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § 70. Jursa 2014b: 131-133.

    Nabonidus is attested at court and as a high-ranking military commander under Nebuchadnezzar.

    “Nabonidus is attested at court and as a high-ranking military commander under Nebuchadnezzar.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [78]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § 56. Jursa 2014b.

    Neo-Babylonian royal inscriptions do not promote an expansionist ideology; instead devotion or humble attention to the supreme god's designs was a primary royal virtue.

    “Royal inscriptions do not promote an expansionist ideology that would have prompted kings to seek legitimacy by expanding the realm subjected to the authority of Marduk: instead, devotion, or humble attention to the supreme god's (inscrutable) designs was a primary royal virtue.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [60]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § 70. Jursa 2014b: 131-133.

    The temples were a focus of local administration, with the highest-ranking priests always taking a central place.

    “The temples were a focus of local administration: the highest-ranking priests always took a central place.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § 56. Jursa 2014b.

    The Hofkalender, a building inscription of Nebuchadnezzar dating to 598 bc, is the best supporting evidence for the a priori reasoning about tribal importance and provides a snapshot of the political structure of the Neo-Babylonian Empire shortly after its creation.

    “The best supporting evidence for this a priori reasoning comes from a unique source which will here be used to provide a snapshot of the political structure of the Neo-Babylonian Empire shortly after its creation: the Hofkalender, a building inscription of Nebuchadnezzar dating to 598 bc.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [64]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • Rests on an assumption: The Hofkalender provides a reliable snapshot of the political structure of the Neo-Babylonian Empire shortly after its creation.
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § 64. Da Riva 2013b.

    In the Hofkalender, the list of men in charge of the empire's territories beyond direct royal control follows the list of palace officials; they were the 'magnates of the land of Akkad.'

    “In the Hofkalender, the list of men in charge of the empire's territories beyond the direct control of the crown follows the list of palace officials: they were the “magnates of the land of Akkad””
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [64]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given
    § 56. Jursa 2014b.

    In the Neo-Babylonian Empire, supreme political power was vested in the king, who derived his legitimacy from acting as the gods' vicar on earth.

    “the supreme political power was vested in the king who derived his legitimacy from the fact that he acted as the gods' vicar on earth.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § 64. Da Riva 2013b.

    Some officials worked principally within the palace, close to the king, with duties related to the king's household, while others were concerned with state administration beyond the royal household.

    “Some officials worked principally within the palace, in close proximity to the king, and had duties related to the administration of the king's household, while others were concerned with state administration beyond the immediate sphere of the royal household.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § 64. Da Riva 2013b.

    The Hofkalender list concludes with seven vassal kings from the Levant, among them the kings of Tyre, Gaza, Sidon, Arwad, and Ashdod; a king of Judah was not mentioned.

    “The list concludes with seven vassal kings from the Levant, among them the kings of Tyre, Gaza, Sidon, Arwad, and Ashdod (a king of Judah was not mentioned).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [64]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § 56. Jursa 2014b.

    The Hofkalender is a misnomer for the inscription, which provided an account of the construction of a palace.

    “The inscription provided an account of the construction of a palace, and the traditionally used modern designation of Hofkalender (German for “court diary”) is actually a misnomer.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [64]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation
    § 90. The following draws on Jursa and

    The episode appears in the Royal Chronicle.

    “Additionally, the episode appears in the Royal Chronicle.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [121]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation
    § 56. Jursa 2014b.

    The land of Akkad consisted of central and northern Babylonia, including regions east of the Tigris.

    “The land of Akkad consisted of central and northern Babylonia, including regions east of the Tigris.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § 56. Jursa 2014b.

    The Sealand in southern Babylonia comprised the delta region of the Euphrates and Tigris, the core area of Chaldean settlement, and included the old Babylonian cities of Ur, Uruk, and Larsa.

    “the Sealand in the south comprised the delta region of the Euphrates and Tigris, i.e., the core area of Chaldean settlement, which also included the old Babylonian cities of Ur, Uruk, and Larsa.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [57]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 90. The following draws on Jursa and

    The primary theme of all related sources is Nabonidus's decision to reinstate the office of high priestess (entu) of the moon god in Ur, an office that had long fallen into oblivion.

    “The primary theme of all related sources is the king's decision to reinstate the office of high priestess (entu) of the moon god in Ur, an office with a venerable tradition that had long fallen into oblivion.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § 56. Jursa 2014b.

    The elites of the old Babylonian cities preserved part of their old semi-autonomy and claimed special treatment from the crown based on the religious importance of their city cults.

    “whose elites preserved part of their old semi-autonomy (or at least its memory) and claimed special treatment from the crown based on the religious importance of their city cults.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [58]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § 90. The following draws on Jursa and

    Blaming the derelict state of the Harran temple on the fecklessness of the Medes, whom he portrayed as barbarous enemies, Nabonidus had the temple rebuilt during the second half of his reign, as commemorated by a stele erected in Harran.

    “Blaming the derelict state of the temple there on the fecklessness of the Medes, whom he portrayed as barbarous enemies, Nabonidus had the temple rebuilt during the second half of his reign, as also commemorated by a stele erected in Harran (figure 50.4).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given
    § 50.4. State structure: a view from the center

    The first was that of the Babylonian monarchy, with its strong focus on the capital city of Babylon and the cult of the god Marduk, the main deity of the city and therefore also of the country as a whole.

    “The first was that of the Babylonian monarchy, with its strong focus on the capital city of Babylon (figure 50.3) and the cult of the god Marduk, the main deity of the city and therefore also of the country as a whole.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 64. Da Riva 2013b.

    The major political fault lines lay between the crown and the tribes, on one hand, and the crown and the Babylonian cities, on the other.

    “As expected, the major political fault lines lay between the crown and the tribes, on one hand, and the crown and the Babylonian cities, on the other.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 70. Jursa 2014b: 131-133.

    Nabonidus, assisted by his son Belshazzar, was able to usurp the Babylonian crown based on their military background, their family's history of service to Nebuchadnezzar (and perhaps Nabopolassar), and their family's likely tribal affiliations.

    “Thus, Nabonidus, assisted by his son Belshazzar, was able to usurp the Babylonian crown based on their military background, their family's history of service to Nebuchadnezzar (and perhaps before him, his father Nabopolassar), and their family's likely tribal affiliations”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 90. The following draws on Jursa and

    The local priesthood surely had a hand in that fortunate discovery.

    “The local priesthood surely had a hand in that fortunate discovery.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisereasoning
    § 90. The following draws on Jursa and

    The Verse Account states that Nabonidus built himself a palace in Tayma to match the one in Babylon, drawing on resources from Babylonia.

    “Then, drawing on resources from Babylonia, he built himself a palace to match the one in Babylon.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 50.5. The Neo-Babylonian Empire's political economy

    The royal land allotment schemes of the late seventh and early sixth centuries provided the initial impetus for the reclamation of barren or underused land surrounding the cities after decades of war and unrest, and thus started a process of economic expansion and growth that had no equivalent in Babylonian history.

    “the royal land allotment schemes of the late seventh and early sixth centuries provided the initial impetus for the reclamation of the barren or underused land surrounding the cities after decades of war and unrest, and thus started a process of economic expansion and growth that had no equivalent in Babylonian history.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 192. Zadok 2003; Zilberg 2019; Alstola 2020.

    The non-landowning Babylonians appeared in both urban and rural settings, but these two subgroups probably did not mix very much.

    “The latter group appeared in both urban and rural settings, but these two subgroups probably did not mix very much.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 50.6. Society and economy in the

    The population of sixth-century bc Babylonia was multiethnic and to a significant percentage multilingual, with Aramaic and Babylonian being spoken side by side.

    “The population of sixth-century bc Babylonia was multiethnic and to a significant percentage multilingual, with Aramaic and Babylonian being spoken side by side.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zadok 2003; Zilberg 2019; Alstola 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisenone given
    § 50.5. The Neo-Babylonian Empire's political economy

    The principal burden imposed on these tax units was always conceptualized as a service obligation rather than a straightforward tax.

    “The principal burden imposed on these tax units was always conceptualized as a service obligation rather than a straightforward tax.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given
    § 90. The following draws on Jursa and

    The Cyrus Cylinder and the Verse Account of Nabonidus were written after the fall of the Neo-Babylonian Empire and are extremely hostile to Nabonidus.

    “This changes when we shift our focus to the Cyrus Cylinder and the Verse Account of Nabonidus, two compositions that were written after the fall of the Neo-Babylonian Empire and are extremely hostile to Nabonidus.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 90. The following draws on Jursa and

    The Verse Account portrays this palace as an abomination analogous to Nabonidus's attempt to replicate Esagil in Harran, because the preeminence of Babylon could not be rivaled.

    “This is portrayed as an abomination analogous to his attempt to replicate Esagil in Harran, for the preeminence of Babylon could, and should, not be rivaled.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 50.5. The Neo-Babylonian Empire's political economy

    There was no mass levy on the population of Babylonia for military expeditions in other parts of the empire, because the logistical and financial problems would have been insurmountable.

    “There was no mass levy on the population of Babylonia for military expeditions in other parts of the empire: the logistical and financial problems would have been insurmountable.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 50.5. The Neo-Babylonian Empire's political economy

    New constructions included Nebuchadnezzar's massive North and South Palaces, the city walls, Esagil and its tower, Etemenanki, and the celebrated processional way leading to the monumental Ištar Gate.

    “New constructions included Nebuchadnezzar's massive North and South Palaces, the city walls, Esagil and its tower, Etemenanki (the model for the biblical tower of Babel), and the celebrated processional way leading to the monumental Ištar Gate (figure 50.5).190”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jursa 2010a: 414-417

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 50.5. The Neo-Babylonian Empire's political economy

    The Marduk temple served the interests of the crown, allowing the latter to tighten its control of the provincial temples and maximize the resources it could extract from them: from patrimonial households enjoying a considerable degree of independence, the temples were increasingly turned into extensions of a centralized bureaucracy.

    “The Marduk temple served the interests of the crown, allowing the latter to tighten its control of the provincial temples and maximize the resources it could extract from them: from patrimonial households enjoying a considerable degree of independence, the temples were increasingly turned into extensions of a centralized bureaucracy.166”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [166]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisereasoning
    § 50.5. The Neo-Babylonian Empire's political economy

    For this purpose, tax units of ten or more households were formed, which typically paid for one soldier or corvée worker.

    “For this purpose, tax units of ten (or more) households were formed, which typically paid for one soldier or corvée worker.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 50.5. The Neo-Babylonian Empire's political economy

    While the Neo-Babylonian kings wrought havoc in their imperial periphery by extracting resources and manpower, they transformed the economy of the core imperial region by reinvesting those very same resources and manpower.

    “While the Neo-Babylonian kings wrought havoc in their imperial periphery by extracting resources and manpower, they transformed the economy of the core imperial region by reinvesting those very same resources and manpower.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 50.5. The Neo-Babylonian Empire's political economy

    The large-scale building projects mounted by the Neo-Babylonian kings, especially Nebuchadnezzar, created the grand architectural layout in the city of Babylon that was later rediscovered and made world-famous by the German excavations under Robert Koldewey.

    “In this period, the large-scale building projects mounted by the Neo-Babylonian kings, especially Nebuchadnezzar, created the grand architectural layout in the city of Babylon that was later rediscovered and made world-famous by the German excavations under Robert Koldewey.189”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisereasoning
    § 90. The following draws on Jursa and

    The Verse Account condemns Nabonidus's ten-year sojourn in Arabia, the one major military undertaking of his reign.

    “Immediately after its condemnation of the construction of the Harran temple building, the verse account goes on to condemn the one major military undertaking of Nabonidus's reign, his ten-year sojourn in Arabia.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 50.5. The Neo-Babylonian Empire's political economy

    The 'land-for-service system' integrated foreign groups into the fabric of the state and extended the range of state-controlled agriculture into otherwise under-exploited areas.

    “Thus, the”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § 90. The following draws on Jursa and

    The Verse Account states that Nabonidus entrusted 'the troops of the (non-Babylonian) lands' to his first-born son Belshazzar while he took Babylonian troops to Tayma, killed its king, and slaughtered its populace.

    “It states that Nabonidus entrusted”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [133]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 50.5. The Neo-Babylonian Empire's political economy

    The surplus of the tributary empire could be taken directly from producers, indirectly by targeting local urban elites, using violence, or through regulated and predictable taxation based ultimately on the threat of violence.

    “This surplus could be taken either directly from the producers, or indirectly by targeting local, urban elites who had already accumulated the surplus produced by peasant labor in their respective regions; or it could be extracted using violence, or through some form of regulated and predictable taxation (based, in the final count, on the threat of violence).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 50.5. The Neo-Babylonian Empire's political economy

    Neo-Babylonian kings had unprecedented resources to accomplish these duties, and consequently built on an unprecedented scale.

    “Neo-Babylonian kings had unprecedented resources to accomplish these duties, and consequently built on an unprecedented scale indeed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 50.5. The Neo-Babylonian Empire's political economy

    The demand for manpower was particularly significant, labor being probably the most sought-after resource in the Neo-Babylonian Empire in general.

    “The demand for manpower was particularly significant, labor being probably the most sought-after resource in the Neo-Babylonian Empire in general.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisenone given
    § 90. The following draws on Jursa and

    Nabonidus's inscription recounting the rebuilding of the Harran temple was written probably after his return from Arabia in his thirteenth year.

    “In his inscription recounting the rebuilding of the temple in Harran, which was written probably after Nabonidus's return from Arabia in his thirteenth year, the king was quite explicit:”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation
    § 90. The following draws on Jursa and

    The Verse Account designates the resulting Harran building an outrage and an abomination.

    “The resulting building is designated an outrage and an abomination.132”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [132]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation
    § 90. The following draws on Jursa and

    The Verse Account claims that Nabonidus strove to emulate the splendor and prestige of Esagil, Marduk's temple in Babylon, in his restoration of the moon god's temple in Harran.

    “the Verse Account claims that the king strove to emulate the splendor and prestige of Esagil, Marduk's temple in Babylon.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data
    § 50.5. The Neo-Babylonian Empire's political economy

    The majority of building projects were situated in Babylon and, to a lesser degree, in Borsippa, but other cities were by no means neglected.

    “The majority of projects were situated in Babylon and, to a lesser degree, in Babylon's twin city Borsippa, but other cities were by no means neglected: royal building work was undertaken in Sippar, Akkad, Kiš, Cutha, Dilbat, Marad, Isin, Kissik, Uruk, Larsa, and Ur.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisenone given
    § 90. The following draws on Jursa and

    The Royal Chronicle emphasized the king's decisiveness when he faced the doubts of his expert priests and diviners.

    “The Royal Chronicle emphasized the king's decisiveness when he faced the doubts of his expert priests and diviners.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 50.5. The Neo-Babylonian Empire's political economy

    The most frequently built structures by the Neo-Babylonian kings were temples, but palaces and city walls were also erected.

    “the most frequently built structures were temples, but palaces and city walls were also erected.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Da Riva 2008: 109-113

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation
    § 90. The following draws on Jursa and

    Later in the Verse Account, Nabonidus is said to have misunderstood Esagil's religious symbolism and claimed Marduk's temple for the moon god, implicitly ousting Marduk from his preeminent position in the pantheon.

    “Later in the text, Nabonidus is even said to have, either intentionally or inadvertently, misunderstood Esagil's religious symbolism and claimed Marduk's temple for the moon god, implicitly ousting Marduk from his preeminent position in the pantheon.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 50.5. The Neo-Babylonian Empire's political economy

    Local institutions, temples, cities, and citizen bodies organized much of the work, and the crown supervised and paid.

    “Local institutions, temples, cities, and citizen bodies organized much of the work, and the crown supervised and paid.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 50.5. The Neo-Babylonian Empire's political economy

    In Nebuchadnezzar's palace, large groups of foreign specialists, mostly from the west (e.g., Phoenicians and Ionians), were present; 176 such men would also have been employed elsewhere.

    “In Nebuchadnezzar's palace, large groups of foreign specialists, mostly from the west (e.g., Phoenicians and “Ionians”) were present; 176 such men would also have been employed elsewhere.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pedersén 2005a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 50.6. Society and economy in the

    Babylonians, Arameans, and Chaldeans had shared the country for centuries, and under imperial rule other groups increasingly arrived too, either by their own volition, as was the case for many Arabs, or by the will of the state, as in the case of deportees from the west, such as the Judeans who arrived after the fall of Jerusalem.

    “Babylonians, Arameans, and Chaldeans had shared the country for centuries, and under imperial rule other groups increasingly arrived too, either by their own volition, as was the case for many Arabs, or by the will of the state, as in the case of deportees from the west, such as the Judeans who arrived after the fall of Jerusalem.192”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zadok 2003; Zilberg 2019; Alstola 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 90. The following draws on Jursa and

    The Verse Account takes the view of the priestly counselors who were overruled and presents Nabonidus's stance on the celestial omen as folly, whereas Nabonidus's own inscription sees a competent decision.

    “but where Nabonidus's own inscription sees a competent decision made by the king, the Verse Account takes the view of the priestly counselors who were overruled and presents the king's stance as folly.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given
    § 50.5. The Neo-Babylonian Empire's political economy

    Direct taxation of agrarian income, as well as extraction of labor and military service, is attested in three forms for three distinct categories: temples; recipients of royal land grants encumbered with tax and service obligations; and landowning urban households.

    “Direct taxation of (agrarian) income, as well as the extraction of labor and military service, is attested in three forms, for three distinct categories of social agents or groups: the temples; recipients of royal land grants encumbered with tax and service obligations; and landowning urban households.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 50.5. The Neo-Babylonian Empire's political economy

    The urban population of Babylonia was perhaps the most important domestic tax base in the empire: a large part of the population lived in cities, and urban landowners were the only stratum of society, apart from institutional households and royal officials, that could potentially dispose of a substantial taxable surplus.

    “The urban population of Babylonia was perhaps the most important domestic tax base in the empire: a large part of the population lived in cities, 162 and urban landowners were the only stratum of society, apart from the institutional households and royal officials, that could potentially dispose of a substantial taxable surplus.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [162]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § 50.5. The Neo-Babylonian Empire's political economy

    Babylonian cities contributed to the army through specific taxes exacted from the temples and with the men paid for by the tax and service units composed of the propertied urban households.

    “Babylonian cities contributed to the army through specific taxes exacted from the temples 170 and with the men paid for by the tax and service units composed of the propertied urban households.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [170]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisenone given
    § 50.5. The Neo-Babylonian Empire's political economy

    Taxes levied on the income of temple estates were collected by a royal official attached to the Esagil temple in Babylon.

    “Taxes levied on the income of temple estates were collected by a royal official attached to the Esagil temple in Babylon.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 50.5. The Neo-Babylonian Empire's political economy

    A canal-building project north of Sippar sponsored first by Nabopolassar and continued by his successors eventually connected the Euphrates and the Tigris and opened up a significant part of northern Babylonia to intensive agrarian expansion, demonstrably tripling the agricultural output of the region.

    “Spanning several decades, a canal-building project north of Sippar that was sponsored first by Nabopolassar and then continued by his successors, eventually connected the Euphrates and the Tigris and opened up a significant part of northern Babylonia to intensive agrarian expansion, demonstrably tripling the agricultural output of the region.185”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jursa 2010a: 326-334

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 90. The following draws on Jursa and

    In a short period of time, the Persian Empire had become the most powerful state in the entire Middle East and was on its way to world dominion.

    “In a short period of time, the Persian Empire had become the most powerful state in the entire Middle East and was on its way to world dominion.130”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [130]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 90. The following draws on Jursa and

    The Verse Account reflects the political views of its authors, who were or were forced to be supporters of Persian rule.

    “The Verse Account of course reflects the political views of its authors, who were-or were forced to be-supporters of Persian rule.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 50.5. The Neo-Babylonian Empire's political economy

    Babylonian kings also relied on substantial numbers of mercenaries, hired either individually or in collectives, in which case the boundary between straightforward employment and more or less forced 'conscription' was likely to have been fluid.

    “Babylonian kings also relied on substantial numbers of mercenaries, who were hired either on an individual basis or in collectives, in which case the boundary between straightforward employment and more or less forced”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 50.5. The Neo-Babylonian Empire's political economy

    Taking native troops out of the country and leaving non-Babylonian mercenaries and deportees to secure Babylonia is an expected precaution in Nabonidus's case, as he clearly feared malcontent during his absence.

    “Taking native troops out of the country and leaving non-Babylonian mercenaries and deportees to secure Babylonia is an expected precaution in Nabonidus's case, as he clearly feared malcontent during his absence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 90. The following draws on Jursa and

    Not all was well when Nabonidus left for Arabia, entrusting Babylonia for a decade to his son Belshazzar, whose regency is well documented in the contemporary archival record.

    “Still, it is clear that not all was well when Nabonidus left for Arabia, entrusting Babylonia for a decade to his son Belshazzar, whose regency is well documented in the contemporary archival record.134”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [134]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 192. Zadok 2003; Zilberg 2019; Alstola 2020.

    Urban Babylonians kept themselves segregated from the surrounding Arameans and Chaldeans, rigorously on the level of marriage and lineage, and less distinctly but still noticeably on the level of economic interchange.

    “On the social level this is apparent from the considerable care with which urban Babylonians kept themselves segregated from the surrounding Arameans and Chaldeans, rigorously so on the level of marriage and lineage, and less distinctly but still noticeably, on the level of economic interchange.194”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zadok 2003: 484 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 90. The following draws on Jursa and

    Nothing in the archival sources, which are remarkably rich and varied for the period, suggests anything like the widespread unrest and multifaceted catastrophe evoked in Nabonidus's Harran inscription, though there is some evidence for a famine in 545/544 bc.

    “These are strong words, but in fact nothing in the archival sources, which are remarkably rich and varied for the period in question, suggests anything like the widespread unrest and multifaceted catastrophe evoked here (even though there is some evidence for a famine in 545/ 544 bc 136 ).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [136]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 50.5. The Neo-Babylonian Empire's political economy

    There is a distinct probability that Nabonidus also had an Aramean background.

    “there is a distinct probability that he also had an Aramean background.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 90. The following draws on Jursa and

    The Verse Account mirrors the Royal Chronicle's motif but presents Nabonidus's decisiveness as incompetence and insane hubris, and describes him as baselessly self-aggrandizing and obstinate instead of willing to follow precedents.

    “This is mirrored in the Verse Account, but here it is presented as incompetence and insane hubris, and instead of Nabonidus's willingness to follow the precedents laid by the venerable kings of the past, which is consistently referenced in his inscriptions, he is described as baselessly self-aggrandizing and obstinate:”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 50.5. The Neo-Babylonian Empire's political economy

    The example of Judah demonstrates both the general principle and the possible consequences when client kingdoms did not conform to Babylonian expectations.

    “The example of Judah demonstrates both the general principle and the possible consequences when client kingdoms did not conform to Babylonian expectations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 50.5. The Neo-Babylonian Empire's political economy

    Thousands of men were employed on these large building sites at any given time, and thousands of others must have labored to feed, clothe, supervise, and possibly also guard them.

    “Thousands of men were employed on these large building sites at any given time-and thousands of others must have labored to feed, clothe, supervise, and possibly also guard them.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 50.6.2. Economy

    Agricultural production intensified qualitatively; seeding rates were higher and furrows were more narrowly spaced than in earlier periods.

    “Agricultural production also intensified qualitatively; seeding rates were higher and furrows were more narrowly spaced than in earlier periods.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 50.6.2. Economy

    Social mobility in this sector of the urban population was quite high.

    “Social mobility in this sector of the urban population was quite high.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 202. The most incisive pertinent study is Waerzeggers 2010.

    Men in royal service often belonged to this wide group; they were probably specifically recruited from outside the urban bourgeoisie in order to avoid frequent conflicts of interest between the crown and the urban oligarchies.

    “Men in royal service often belonged to this wide group; in fact they were probably specifically recruited from outside the “urban bourgeoisie” in order to avoid the frequent conflicts of interest between the crown and the urban oligarchies; 211”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jursa 2017

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 50.6.2. Economy

    Many fields were turned into palm gardens, a long-term investment leading to even higher overall returns.

    “Moreover, many fields were turned into palm gardens: a long-term investment leading to even higher overall returns.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 192. Zadok 2003; Zilberg 2019; Alstola 2020.

    The roots of the clan system lay in the Late Bronze Age, and by the seventh century bc, it was almost ubiquitous in Babylonian cities.

    “The roots of this clan system lay in the Late Bronze Age, and by the seventh century bc, it was almost ubiquitous in Babylonian cities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 50.6.2. Economy

    The climate grew wetter, the river system in the flood-plain of Babylonia stabilized, and the preconditions for agricultural production improved.

    “The climate grew wetter, the river system in the flood-plain of Babylonia stabilized, and the preconditions for agricultural production improved.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 50.6.2. Economy

    Overall, agricultural production was increasingly geared toward markets; regional specialization and a significant interdependence between rural producers and urban consumers were the consequence.

    “Overall, agricultural production was increasingly geared toward markets; regional specialization and a significant interdependence between rural producers and urban consumers were the consequence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 50.6.2. Economy

    Monetization was further accelerated by the royal demand for cash taxes and by the outsourcing of Babylonian urban households' labor and military service obligations to hired men.

    “Monetization was further accelerated by the royal demand for (cash) taxes and by the outsourcing of Babylonian urban households' labor and military service obligations to hired men: willingly or unwillingly, taxpayers were forced into the monetary economy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 192. Zadok 2003; Zilberg 2019; Alstola 2020.

    Širku are best understood not as temple slaves, but as unemancipated children of the temple; they could not be sold, in contrast to slaves, who were subject to property law and were therefore technically things.

    “They are best understood not as temple slaves, but as unemancipated “children of the temple”; while the temple institution held permanent discretionary power over them, they could not be sold-in contrast to slaves, who were subject to property law and were therefore technically “things.””
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 192. Zadok 2003; Zilberg 2019; Alstola 2020.

    Priestly offices were prized family heirlooms and on par with real estate for the prestige they conferred and the income they entailed.

    “Such offices were prized family heirlooms and on par with real estate for the prestige they conferred and the income they entailed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 50.6.2. Economy

    The economic life of the non-Babylonian parts of the population remains only sketchily documented.

    “Finally, the economic life of the non-Babylonian parts of the population remains only sketchily documented.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 50.7. In conclusion: an accidental empire

    Integration of the Chaldean and Aramaic tribes, the single most potent political force in the country, seems to have been less successful.

    “Integration of the single most potent political force in the country, the Chaldean and Aramaic tribes, seems to have been less successful.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 192. Zadok 2003; Zilberg 2019; Alstola 2020.

    Businesses were independent legal entities created for commercial purposes by one or more investors; their property was kept separate from that of the investors; investors could be indebted to their own companies.

    “Businesses were independent legal entities created for commercial purposes by one or more investors.Their property was kept separate from that of the investors; investors could be indebted to their own companies.198”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jursa 2010c

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 192. Zadok 2003; Zilberg 2019; Alstola 2020.

    Apart from individuals, Babylonian law also recognized temples and businesses as legal persons.

    “Apart from individuals, Babylonian law also recognized temples and businesses as legal persons.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 50.6.2. Economy

    A bird's-eye view of the macro-economic development of the Babylonian economy under the Babylonian empire reveals population growth and urbanization coupled with royal investment in the agrarian infrastructure and the indirect effects of royal building projects setting a positive feedback cycle in motion.

    “A bird's-eye view of the macro-economic development of the Babylonian economy under the Babylonian empire reveals the following: 218 population growth and urbanization coupled with royal investment in the agrarian infrastructure and the indirect effects of royal building projects setting a positive feedback cycle in motion.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jursa 2014c

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 50.6.2. Economy

    Sheep breeding, especially for the production of wool, was the third principal agrarian activity.

    “Sheep breeding, especially for the production of wool, was the third principal agrarian activity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 50.6.2. Economy

    Inflation caused the value of silver to fall to about a third of what it had been in the second millennium bc, allowing silver to function as an all-purpose currency for the first time in history.

    “Inflation caused the value of silver to fall to about a third of what it had been in the second millennium bc, allowing silver to function as an all-purpose currency for the first time in history.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 50.6.2. Economy

    Temples were heavily dependent on silver-based exchange and the market; part of their production was increasingly specialized and geared toward the market.

    “Rather than being essentially autarchic, temples were heavily dependent on silver-based exchange and the market: part of their production-of dates, grain, or wool, as the case may have been-was increasingly specialized and geared toward the market.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 50.6.2. Economy

    Small-scale date gardening on private estates led to an overall intensification of agrarian production, increased outputs, and drove agrarian change.

    “Smallscale date gardening on private estates led to an overall intensification of agrarian production, increased outputs, and drove agrarian change.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 202. The most incisive pertinent study is Waerzeggers 2010.

    Money could even subvert the value at the core of Babylonian society, the deference owed to a father: when suffering hardship, parents could be forced to beg for help from a son.

    “Money could even subvert the value at the core of Babylonian society, the deference owed to a father: when suffering hardship, parents could be forced to beg for help from a son: “I know you have helped me many times, but please do so again.”210”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jursa in Hackl et al. 2014: 97-98

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 192. Zadok 2003; Zilberg 2019; Alstola 2020.

    There was some crossover between military and artisanal/commercial clans, but the priestly clans retained their separate identity for the most part.

    “There was some crossover between military and artisanal/ commercial clans, but as far as we can tell, the priestly clans retained their separate identity for the most part.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 202. The most incisive pertinent study is Waerzeggers 2010.

    The prestige conferred by age was stronger than gender differences and could even trump a slave's expected deference to his master.

    “The prestige conferred by age was stronger than gender differences and, to a certain degree, it could even trump a slave's expected deference to his master.207”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jursa in Hackl et al. 2014: 97-98

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 50.6.2. Economy

    Household inventories, dowry lists, and similar textual sources (as well as the archaeological record) document the presence of substantial quantities of precious metals in private households and show a complex material culture characterized by a greater variety of objects owned by well-to-do Babylonians than in earlier periods.

    “Household inventories, dowry lists, and similar textual sources (as well as the archaeological record) not only document the presence of substantial quantities of precious metals in private households, they also show a complex material culture characterized by a greater variety of objects owned by well-to-do Babylonians than had been the case in earlier periods.222”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jursa 2010a: 806-811

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 50.6.2. Economy

    Most priests cultivated an archetypical rentier mentality.

    “Most priests, on the other hand, cultivated an archetypical rentier mentality.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 50.7. In conclusion: an accidental empire

    In the case of rebellion, punishment was harsh, as the example of Judah shows.

    “In the case of rebellion, punishment was harsh, as the example of Judah shows.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 192. Zadok 2003; Zilberg 2019; Alstola 2020.

    At least originally, the military clans had a close relationship to the crown, even if the increasingly strong Chaldean and/or Aramean presence in the palace may have loosened this connection to some degree by the sixth century.

    “At least originally, the military clans had a close relationship to the crown, even if the increasingly strong Chaldean and/ or Aramean presence in the palace may have loosened this connection to some degree by the sixth century.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 50.7. In conclusion: an accidental empire

    In the heartland of the Babylonian empire, Nebuchadnezzar in particular promoted a clearly intentional policy of institution-building and centralization that aimed to strengthen the power of the crown and the importance of the capital city Babylon at the expense of other Babylonian cities.

    “In the heartland of the Babylonian empire, Nebuchadnezzar in particular promoted a clearly intentional policy of institution-building and centralization that aimed to strengthen the power of the crown and the importance of the capital city Babylon at the expense of other Babylonian cities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 202. The most incisive pertinent study is Waerzeggers 2010.

    Babylonians were expected to address their betters indirectly, and letters, arguments, and expressions of politeness were carefully calibrated to express perceived differences in rank.

    “Thus, Babylonians were expected to address their betters not directly, but indirectly: “May my lord . . ., ” and letters, arguments, and expressions of politeness were carefully calibrated to express the perceived differences in rank between senders and addressees.205”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hackl et al. 2014: no.71

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 50.6.2. Economy

    On average, cereal farming in the sixth century bc produced about 25 percent higher returns than in the Middle Bronze Age.

    “On average, cereal farming in the sixth century bc produced about 25 percent higher returns than in the Middle Bronze Age.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 50.6.2. Economy

    Not all social strata and sectors responded equally to this economic transition, or profited in the same way from it.

    “Not all social strata and sectors responded equally to this economic transition, or profited in the same way from it.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 50.6.2. Economy

    Throughout most of antiquity and the pre-modern period, the average wheat wage was between 3.5 and 6.5 liters, but Babylonians under the Neo-Babylonian Empire earned wheat wages between 9.6 and 14.4 liters-significantly more than their counterparts in the late third and early second millennium bc (4.8-8 liters).

    “Throughout most of antiquity and the pre-modern period, the average wheat wage was between 3.5 and 6.5 liters, but Babylonians under the Neo-Babylonian Empire earned wheat wages between 9.6 and 14.4 liters-significantly more than their counterparts in the late third and early second millennium bc (4.8-8 liters).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jursa 2010a: 811-816

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 50.6.2. Economy

    The economy of the Babylonian heartland was predominantly agrarian, based on irrigation agriculture with a double focus on barley and the more labor-intensive, but also more productive, cultivation of dates.

    “The economy of the Babylonian heartland was predominantly agrarian, based on irrigation agriculture with a double focus on barley and the more labor-intensive, but also more productive, cultivation of dates.216”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jursa 2010a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation
    § 192. Zadok 2003; Zilberg 2019; Alstola 2020.

    Temple dependents were designated as širku, meaning oblate or person gifted to the temple.

    “The temple dependents are the better-known group and were designated as širku, meaning “oblate; person gifted to the temple.””
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 50.6.2. Economy

    Cash income was hoarded only in part; a large percentage was spent to make up the shortfall in labor that all the temples we know sufficiently well suffered from.

    “Cash income 222.Jursa 2010a: 806-811. 1 6 0 was hoarded only in part; a large percentage was spent to make up the shortfall in labor that all the temples we know sufficiently well suffered from.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 50.6.2. Economy

    Manual workers found profitable work on construction sites.

    “Manual workers found profitable work on construction sites, and the urban propertied commercial and artisanal clans made the most of the opportunities that opened up, engaging in trade, agrarian management, and other entrepreneurial activities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 50.6.2. Economy

    Average salaries in terms of purchasing power not only reached a level unseen in Babylonian history, they were high by any comparative standard.

    “In other words, average salaries-in terms of purchasing power-not only reached a level unseen in Babylonian history, they were high by any comparative standard.221”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 192. Zadok 2003; Zilberg 2019; Alstola 2020.

    Širku lived in family groups and could own property.

    “Širku lived in family groups and could own property.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 50.6.2. Economy

    Maintaining the status quo was a core value of priestly society.

    “In economic terms, this sector of urban society was the least dynamic that we know of-but maintaining the status quo was of course a core value of priestly society.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 202. The most incisive pertinent study is Waerzeggers 2010.

    Restrictions on marriage were less strict, and among temple dependents, single mothers were frequent; adultery clauses in lower class marriage documents threaten the adulteress with death, which does not occur in upper class marriages.

    “Restrictions on marriage were less strict, and among temple dependents, single mothers were frequent; but on the other hand, adultery clauses in “lower class” marriage documents threaten the adulteress with death, which does not occur in “upper class” marriages.213”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jursa 2010a: 766

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 50.6.2. Economy

    The crown furthered the practicability of this transition by introducing means for safeguarding the quality of silver and by attempting to set fixed interest rates.

    “The crown furthered the practicability of this transition, by introducing a variety of means for safeguarding the quality of silver, and also by attempting to set fixed interest rates.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 192. Zadok 2003; Zilberg 2019; Alstola 2020.

    Eligibility for priestly office depended on physical fitness, relevant training, and most of all, on demonstrable descent from an initiated priest.

    “Eligibility depended on physical fitness, relevant training, and most of all, on demonstrable descent from an initiated priest-hence the paramount importance attributed to lineage in priestly circles.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 50.6.2. Economy

    There was salaried mass-labor for public building, next to equally substantial numbers of compelled workers; hired labor made its appearance in all walks of life.

    “There was not only salaried mass-labor for public building (next to equally substantial numbers of compelled workers, of course); hired labor made its appearance in all walks of life, from the rural economy to increasingly specialized artisanal production within an urban context.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 50.7. In conclusion: an accidental empire

    The economy expanded both quantitatively and qualitatively.

    “The material benefits of 1 6 2 empire were substantial: cities were changed probably beyond recognition by royally sponsored building programs, and the economy expanded both quantitatively and qualitatively, allowing Babylonia to experience a phase of unprecedented prosperity-a prosperity that the periphery suffered to maintain, of course.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 50.7. In conclusion: an accidental empire

    After the fall of the Neo-Babylonian Empire, Babylonia began a new transformation.

    “After the fall of the empire, this prosperity was harvested by the new Persian rulers, and Babylonia began a new transformation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 50.7. In conclusion: an accidental empire

    The end of the Neo-Babylonian Empire and of Babylonian independence came quickly with the defeat of its final king Nabonidus at the hands of the Persians.

    “Still, while the end of the Neo-Babylonian Empire, and of Babylonian independence, came quickly with the defeat of its still partly enigmatic final king Nabonidus at the hands of the Persians, it is not evident that structural weakness or systemic internal strife had brought about, or hastened, the collapse of the empire.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 50.7. In conclusion: an accidental empire

    As a direct result of its position at the heart of an empire, the Neo-Babylonian Empire's core experienced a remarkable socioeconomic transformation.

    “As a direct result of its position at the heart of an empire, it experienced a remarkable socioeconomic transformation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 50.7. In conclusion: an accidental empire

    The periphery suffered to maintain Babylonia's prosperity.

    “The material benefits of 1 6 2 empire were substantial: cities were changed probably beyond recognition by royally sponsored building programs, and the economy expanded both quantitatively and qualitatively, allowing Babylonia to experience a phase of unprecedented prosperity-a prosperity that the periphery suffered to maintain, of course.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
175 of 175
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The Hofkalender provides a reliable snapshot of the political structure of the Neo-Babylonian Empire shortly after its creation.

    “the Hofkalender, a building inscription of Nebuchadnezzar dating to 598 bc.”
    “will here be used to provide a snapshot of the political structure of the Neo-Babylonian Empire shortly after its creation”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The Medes never had stable control over the city of Harran and its region.

    “Even though there are good grounds to assume that the Medes never had stable control over”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Nabonidus's later inscriptions placed Sîn in too prominent a position to be acceptable within the traditional theology of Marduk.

    “his later inscriptions consistently placed Sîn in too prominent a position to be acceptable within the traditional theology of Marduk:”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The legal status of crown dependents (literally slaves of the king) was perceived as analogous to that of temple dependents.

    “Presumably, the legal status of crown dependents (literally “slaves of the king”) was perceived as analogous to that of temple dependents.”
4 of 4

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 68

  1. Barjamovic, G. 2004. Civic institutions and self-government in southern Mesopotamia in the mid-first millennium BC. In Dercksen, J.G. (ed.), Assyria and beyond: studies presented to Mogens Trolle Larsen. Leiden: Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten, 47–98.
  2. Braun-Holzinger, E., and Frahm, E. 1999. Liebling des Marduk—König der Blasphemie: große babylonische Herrscher in der Sicht der Babylonier und in der Sicht anderer Völker. In Renger, J. (ed.), Babylon: Focus mesopotamischer Geschichte: Wiege früher Gelehrsamkeit, Mythos in der Moderne. Saarbrücken: Saarbrücker Druckerei und Verlag, 131–156.
  3. 2002, From Cyrus to Alexander: a history of the Persian empire
  4. 1996, Nippur, vol. IV: the Early Neo-Babylonian governor’s archive from Nippur
  5. 164Curtis, J. 2003. The Assyrian heartland in the period 612–539 BC. In Lanfranchi, G.B., Roaf, M., and Rollinger, R. (eds.), Continuity of empire (?): Assyria, Media, Persia. Padova: s.a.r.g.o.n., 157–167.
  6. 2008, The Neo-Babylonian royal inscriptions
  7. Da Riva, R. 2010a. A lion in the cedar forest: international politics and pictorial self-representations of Nebuchadnezzar II (605–562 BC). In Vidal, J. (ed.), Studies on war in the ancient Near East: collected essays on military history. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag, 165–192.
  8. Da Riva, R. 2010b. Dynastic gods and favourite gods in the Neo-Babylonian period. In Lanfranchi, G.B., and Rollinger, R. (eds.), Concepts of kingship in antiquity. Padova: s.a.r.g.o.n., 45–61.
  9. Da Riva, R. 2010c. Just another brick in the Median Wall. In Kosyan, A., Petrosyan, A., and Grekyan, Y. (eds.), Festschrift in honor of Nicolay Harutyunyan. Yerevan: Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography, 55–65.
  10. 2012, The twin inscriptions of Nebuchadnezzar at Brisa (Wadi esh-Sharbin, Lebanon): a historical and philological study
  11. Da Riva, R. 2012b. BM 67405 and the cross country walls of Nebuchadnezzar II. In del Olmo Lete, G., Vidal, J., and Wyatt, N. (eds.), The perfumes of seven tamarisks: studies in honour of Wilfred G.E. Watson. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag, 15–18.
  12. 2020, A new typology of arrowheads from the Late Iron Age and Persian period and its historical implications., Israel Exploration Journal
  13. Finkel, I. 1999. The Lament of Nabû-šuma-ukīn. In Renger, J. (ed.), Babylon: Focus mesopotamischer Geschichte, Wiege früher Gelehrsamkeit, Mythos in der Moderne. Saarbrücken: Saarbrücker Druckerei und Verlag, 323–342.
  14. 1992, Babylonia 689–627 BC: a political history
  15. Fuchs, A. 2014. Die unglaubliche Geburt des neubabylonischen Reiches, oder: die Vernichtung einer Weltmacht durch den Sohn eines Niemand. In Krebernik, M., and Neumann, H. (eds.), Babylonien und seine Nachbarn in neu- und spätbabylonischer Zeit. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag, 25–71.
  16. 2004, Mesopotamian chronicles
  17. 2014, Spätbabylonische Privatbriefe
  18. 2019, Keeping watch in Babylon: the astronomical diaries in context
  19. 2016, Rock relief and cuneiform inscription of king Nabonidus at al-Ḥāʾiṭ (province of Ḥāʾil, Saudi Arabia), Ancient Padakku., ZOrA
  20. Joannès, F. 2000. Guerre et économie dans l’empire néo-babylonien. In Andreau, J., Briant, P., and Descat, R. (eds.), Économie antique: la guerre dans les économies antiques. Saint-Bertrand-de-Comminges: Musée archéologique départemental, 63–81.
  21. Jursa, M. 2003. Observations on the problem of the Median “Empire” on the basis of Babylonian sources. In Lanfranchi, G.B., Roaf, M., and Rollinger, R. (eds.), Continuity of empire (?): Assyria, Media, Persia. Padova: s.a.r.g.o.n., 169–179.
  22. Jursa, M. 2006. Neubabylonische Briefe. In Janowski, B. and Wilhelm, G. (eds.), Briefe (Texte aus der Umwelt des Alten Testaments Neue Folge 3). Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlag, 158–172.
  23. Jursa, M. 2010b. Der neubabylonische Hof. In Jacobs, B., and Rollinger, R. (eds.), Der Achämenidenhof / The Achaemenid court. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 67–106.
  24. Jursa, M. 2010c. Business companies in Babylonia in the first millennium BC: structure, economic strategies, social setting. In Wissa, M. (ed.), The knowledge economy and technological capabilities: Egypt, the Near East and the Mediterranean 2nd millennium BC–1st millennium AD. Barcelona: Editorial Ausa, 53–68.
  25. Jursa, M. 2011a. “Höflinge” (ša rēši, ša rēš šarri, ustarbaru) in babylonischen Quellen des ersten Jahrtausends. In Wiesehöfer, J., Rollinger, R., and Lanfranchi, G.B. (eds.), Ktesias’ Welt / Ctesias’ world. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 159–173.
  26. Jursa, M. 2012. Ein Beamter flucht auf Aramäisch: Alphabetschreiber in der spätbabylonischen Epistolographie und die Rolle des Aramäischen in der babylonischen Verwaltung des sechsten Jahrhunderts v. Chr. In Lanfranchi, G.B., Morandi Bonacossi, D., Pappi, C., and Ponchia, S. (eds.), Leggo! Studies presented to Frederick Mario Fales. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 379–397.
  27. Jursa, M. 2013a. Die babylonische Priesterschaft im ersten Jahrtausend v. Chr. In Kaniuth, K., Löhnert, A., Miller, J.L., Otto, A., Roaf, M., and Sallaberger, W. (eds.), Tempel im Alten Orient. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 151–165.
  28. 2013, Steuer, D: Spätbabylonisch., RlA
  29. 168Jursa, M. 2014b. The Neo-Babylonian Empire. In Gehler, M., and Rollinger, R. (eds.), Imperien und Reiche in der Weltgeschichte: Epochenübergreifende und globalhistorische Vergleiche. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 121–148.
  30. Jursa, M. 2017. The state and its subjects under the Neo-Babylonian Empire. In De Boer, R., and Dercksen, J.G. (eds.), Private and state in the ancient Near East. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 43–67.
  31. 2020, Klio
  32. 2021, Diplomatics, prosopography, and possibly politics: the transition from the “early” Ebabbar archive to the main archive., AfO
  33. Jursa, M., and Debourse, C. 2020. Late Babylonian priestly literature from Babylon. In Dubovský, P., and Giuntoli, F. (eds.), Stones, tablets, and scrolls: periods of the formation of the Bible. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 253–281.
  34. Jursa, M., and Wagensonner, K. 2014. The estates of Šamaš on the Habur. In Kozuh, M., Henkelman, W.M.F., Jones, C.E., and Woods, C. (eds.), Extraction and control: studies in honor of Matthew W. Stolper. Chicago: The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, 109–130.
  35. 2007, NABU
  36. 2008, Tempel und Palast: die Beziehungen zwischen dem König und dem Eanna-Tempel im spätbabylonischen Uruk
  37. 169Kleber, K. 2011. Neither slave nor truly free: the status of the dependents of Babylonian temple households. In Culbertson, L. (ed.), Slaves and households in the Near East. Chicago: The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, 113–134.
  38. Kleber, K. 2014. Zu Waffen und Ausrüstung babylonischer Soldaten in der zweiten Hälfte des 1. Jt. v. Chr. In Neumann, H., Dittmann, R., and Paulus, S. (eds.), Krieg und Frieden im Alten Vorderasien. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag, 429–446.
  39. 1918, Das Ischtar-Tor
  40. 2014, The sacrificial economy: assessors, contractors, and thieves in the management of sacrificial sheep at the Eanna temple of Uruk (ca. 626–520 BC)
  41. Kreppner, J. 2016. The aftermath of the Assyrian Empire as seen from the “Red House Operation” in Tell Sheikh Hamad (ancient Dur-Katlimmu). In MacGinnis, J., Wicke, D., and Greenfield, T. (eds.), The provincial archaeology of the Assyrian Empire. Oxford: Oxbow, 177–187.
  42. Kuhrt, A. 1990. Nabonidus and the Babylonian priesthood. In Beard, M., and North, J. (eds.), Pagan priests: religion and power in the ancient world. London: Duckworth, 119–155.
  43. 1912, Die neubabylonischen Königsinschriften
  44. 1988, Antico Oriente: storia società economia
  45. MacGinnis, J. 2010. Mobilisation and militarisation in the Neo-Babylonian Empire. In Vidal, J. (ed.), Studies on war in the ancient Near East: collected essays on military history. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag, 153–163.
  46. 170Magdalene, F.R., and Wunsch, C. 2011. Slavery between Judah and Babylon: the exilic experience. In Culbertson, L. (ed.), Slaves and households in the Near East. Chicago: The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, 113–134.
  47. 2008, Babylon: Wahrheit
  48. Michalowski, P. 2003. The doors of the past. In Ben-Tor, A., Eph‘al, I., and Machinist, P. (eds.), Hayim and Miriam Tadmor volume. Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society, 136–152.
  49. 2001, Der babylonische König Nabonid in taymanischen Inschriften., Biblische Notizen
  50. 1956, Babylonian chronology, 626 BC–AD 75.
  51. 2005, Archive und Bibliotheken in Babylon
  52. 2021, Babylon: the great city
  53. 2002, Die neuassyrischen Texte aus Tall Šēḫ Ḥamad
  54. 171Rollinger, R. 2003. The western expansion of the Median “Empire”: a re-examination. In Lanfranchi, G.B., Roaf, M., and Rollinger, R. (eds.), Continuity of empire (?): Assyria, Media, Persia. Padova: s.a.r.g.o.n., 289–319.
  55. 2009, Depositaries, depositors and courthouse in sixth-century BC Babylon., Palamedes
  56. 2001, Die Inschriften Nabonids von Babylon und Kyros’ des Großen samt den in ihrem Umfeld entstandenen Tendenzschriften: Textausgabe und Grammatik
  57. Schaudig, H. 2002. Nabonid, der “Gelehrte auf dem Königsthron”: Omina, Synkretismen und die Ausdeutung von Tempel- und Götternamen als Mittel zur Wahrheitsfindung spätbabylonischer Religionspolitik. In Loretz, O., Metzler, K.A., and Schaudig, H. (eds.), Ex Mesopotamia et Syria Lux: Festschrift für Manfried Dietrich. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag, 619–645.
  58. Schaudig, H. 2003. Nabonid, der “Archäologe auf dem Königsthron”: zum Geschichtsbild des ausgehenden neubabylonischen Reiches. In Selz, G.J. (ed.), Festschrift für Burkhart Kienast zu seinem 70. Geburtstage. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag, 447–497.
  59. 2019, Administrative epistolography in Babylonia in the late 6th and early 5th centuries BCE
  60. van der Brugge, C., and Kleber, K. 2016. The empire of trade and the empires of force: Tyre in the Neo-Assyrian and Neo-Babylonian periods. In Moreno 172García, J.-C. (ed.), Dynamics of production in the ancient Near East, 1300–500 BC. Oxford: Oxbow, 187–222.
  61. 1988, The edict of Belshazzar: an alternative interpretation., Journal Ex Oriente Lux
  62. 1998, Eighth century Nippur., Bibliotheca Orientalis
  63. 2001, Neriglissar (Nergal-šarra-uṣur)., RlA
  64. 2002, Elusive silver—in search of a role for a market in an agrarian environment: aspects of Mesopotamia’s society
  65. Waerzeggers, C. 2018. Manuscript and archive: who wrote and read Babylonian chronicles? In Fink, S., and Rollinger, R. (eds.), Conceptualizing past, present and future. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag, 335–346.
  66. 173Wunsch, C. 2014. Babylonische Familiennamen. In Krebernik, M., and Neumann, H. (eds.), Babylonien und seine Nachbarn in neu- und spätbabylonischer Zeit. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag, 289–314.
  67. Wunsch, C., and Magdalene, F.R. 2014. Freedom and dependency: Neo-Babylonian manumission documents with oblation and service obligation. In Kozuh, M., Henkelman, W.M.F., Jones, C.E., and Woods, C. (eds.), Extraction and control: studies in honor of Matthew W. Stolper. Chicago: The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, 337–346.
  68. 2019, At the gates of all nations: a study of displaced and migrant minority groups in the center of the Persian Empire

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jursa, M.
Corresponding author
Jursa, Michael
Venue
The Oxford History of the Ancient Near East Volume V
Published
2023-05-03
Pages
91-173
OpenAlex
W4360617025
Cited by
28
References
75
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3
FWCI
31.48
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Funders
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Northwestern University
  • University of Chicago
  • Universität Wien
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Ancient Near East History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
Keywords
Neo-Babylonian Empire, Babylonian Empire, Babylonian exile, Jerusalem, Judeans, Assyrian Empire, Persian Empire, Levant, Syria, imperial domination, royal building projects, socio-economic change, 6th century BC

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-26, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-26 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review