Energy through fusion at last: synergies in cognitive anthropology and cognitive linguistics
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The similarities in deep semantic structures are due to basic human universal cognitive abilities.
“This is due to the basic human universal cognitive abilities (Palmer, 2006).”
From Syntactic Networks of Interlanguage Across L2 Modalities and Proficiency Levels (2021) · cites this paper as Palmer, 2006
Cites
Arbib, M. A. (2005) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x05000038 · Cited by 1,164 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Syntactic Networks of Interlanguage Across L2 Modalities and Proficiency Levels
Hao, Y., Wang, X., Wu, M., & Liu, H. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643120 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“This is due to the basic human universal cognitive abilities (Palmer, 2006).”
Background
- Authors
- Palmer, G. B.
- Corresponding author
- Palmer, Gary B.
- ORCID
- Palmer, Gary B.
- Venue
- Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives
- Publisher
- Mouton de Gruyter
- Published
- 2006-10-25
- Pages
- 263-304
- OpenAlex
- W4239298331
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2021: 2 · 2020: 14 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 2.47
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
- Keywords
- cognitive anthropology, cognitive linguistics, interdisciplinary synergy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
