The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Literature, Film, and the Mediality of Cultural Memory
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“There is a body of work in media and communication studies that considers how media (images, templates, narratives) are used to ' premediate ' (Brown and Hoskins 2010; Erll 2008; Grusin 2004, 2010; Hoskins and O ' Loughlin 2009) what is to come, to help make the future plausible and thus more manageable and controllable.”
From AI and memory (2024) · cites this paper as Erll 2008
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–201 of 201
Memories by Mad Men: Cultural Memory, Television, and Early 1960s Domesticity
Bacon, K. M. A. (2012) · MacSphere (McMaster University) · doi:10.71548/1126
Metadata
- Authors
- Erll, A.
- Corresponding author
- Erll, Astrid
- ORCID
- Erll, Astrid
- Venue
- Cultural Memory Studies
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter
- Published
- 2008-06-17
- Pages
- 389-398
- OpenAlex
- W3200370884
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 6.67
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- De Gruyter eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literature and Cultural Memory
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Memory, History, Trauma, Identity
- Keywords
- cultural memory, mediality, film and literature, intermediality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
