Narratology and Hermeneutics: Forging the Missing Link
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Gadamer's critique of previous hermeneutic thinkers may not have been the most generous reading of earlier research.
“Some scholars have also noted that Gadamer's critique of previous hermeneutic thinkers may not have been the most generous reading of earlier research”
From Real-time hermeneutics: meaning-making in ludonarrative digital games (2018) · cites this paper as Pettersson, 2009, p. 17
Combining the study of narrative with hermeneutics is hardly unique.
“However, combining the study of narrative to hermeneutics is hardly unique (cf. Pettersson, 2009).”
From Real-time hermeneutics: meaning-making in ludonarrative digital games (2018) · cites this paper as Pettersson, 2009
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Real-time hermeneutics: meaning-making in ludonarrative digital games
Arjoranta, J. (2018) · doi:10.31237/osf.io/uep74 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pettersson, B.
- Corresponding author
- Pettersson, Bo
- Venue
- Narratology in the Age of Cross-Disciplinary Narrative Research
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter
- Published
- 2009-09-15
- Pages
- 11-34
- OpenAlex
- W2503580787
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 2.16
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- De Gruyter eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Narrative Theory and Analysis
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics
- Keywords
- narrative theory, hermeneutics, narrative interpretation, literary theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
